AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the win counts for both cards are zero. However, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has a full set of individual benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This absence of data means a direct performance comparison cannot be established from the database.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 48366. In Passmark tests, it records 85 in DirectX 10, 167 in DirectX 11, 65 in DirectX 12, and 228 in DirectX 9. Its Passmark G2D score is 1030, G3D score is 17132, and GPU compute score is 8987. These figures place the card at the 60th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17083.

The nearest rivals for the AMD card offer context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 sits 0.7% above it with an average score of 17208. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 is 0.3% behind at 17037, and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M is 0.4% behind at 17019. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 trails by 0.9% at 16932. These small deltas indicate the RX 7600 XT clusters tightly with mid-range hardware from previous generations, with no rival in the nearest group exceeding a 1% margin.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has an average benchmark score of zero, a 50th percentile ranking, and no nearest rivals listed. Without benchmark entries, the database cannot produce a meaningful win comparison. The AMD card holds all recorded performance data in this matchup, but that reflects data availability rather than a measured performance advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use different manufacturing processes and chip designs. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process. The Intel chip packs 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The AMD chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, for a density of 65.2 million per mm². The Intel chip is larger and denser, but the AMD chip has a higher boost clock at 2755 MHz versus 2400 MHz for Intel, while the Intel base clock is slightly higher at 2000 MHz versus 1980 MHz.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The AMD card uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The Intel card has 50% more memory capacity and roughly 58% more bandwidth, though the AMD card has a smaller physical footprint at 204 mm length versus 300 mm for Intel.

Compute unit counts favor Intel in raw shader count. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, against 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs for AMD. The AMD card counters with 32 ray tracing cores versus 20 for Intel. Floating point performance splits differently: the AMD card delivers 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.57 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 but 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel and texture rates favor Intel slightly, with 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s versus 176.3 GPixel/s and 352.6 GTexel/s for AMD.

Power and interface requirements diverge sharply. The Intel card has a 400 W TDP and requires an 800 W suggested PSU with a single 16-pin connector. The AMD card has a 190 W TDP, a 450 W suggested PSU, and a single 8-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8. Display outputs differ as well: AMD offers one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while Intel offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The AMD card belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish, released on 2024-01-23. The Intel card uses Xe2-HPG architecture from the Battlemage Pro Series, released on 2025-09-04. The AMD card has a predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV, while the Intel card lists neither.

The Verdict

The database supports only a one-sided verdict. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has complete benchmark coverage, a 60th percentile ranking, and an average score of 17083. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark data, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects its position among all GPUs but cannot be substantiated with measured results. Any decision between these two cards must rely on the AMD card's recorded performance and the architectural specifications of both.

The AMD card is the only option with demonstrated performance in the database. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, sits just 0.7% higher, which places the RX 7600 XT within striking distance of a well-known mid-range performer. The Intel card's 50th percentile ranking suggests it sits near the middle of the database distribution, but without scores, that ranking carries no comparative weight.

The Intel card does hold clear specification advantages in memory capacity, memory bandwidth, shader count, and FP16 throughput. It also uses a newer 5 nm process and a larger, denser chip. Those facts are recorded. Whether those specifications translate into benchmark superiority cannot be determined from the available data.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 19,600 million |

| Die size | 204 mm² | 272 mm² |

| Transistor density | 65.2M / mm² | 72.1M / mm² |

| Base clock | 1980 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2755 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory clock | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective | 2375 MHz 19 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory bus | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 456.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2048 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 128 | 160 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| Ray tracing cores | 32 | 20 |

| Pixel rate | 176.3 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 352.6 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 22.57 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 190 W | 400 W |

| Power connector | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 800 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Length | 204 mm | 300 mm |

| Height | 115 mm | 110 mm |

| Width | Not listed | 40 mm |

| Release date | 2024-01-23 | 2025-09-04 |

| Launch MSRP | 329 USD | 1,199 USD |

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 16 GB.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT boosts to 2755 MHz, which is higher than the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 2400 MHz boost clock.

Q: What is the AMD card's average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083 and ranks at the 60th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, and its average benchmark score is zero.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has a 190 W TDP and a 450 W suggested PSU, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP and an 800 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 32 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 20.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins on every measurable performance metric in the database, because it is the only card with benchmark results. Its Passmark G3D score of 17132 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2348 establish a concrete performance baseline. It also wins on FP32 throughput with 22.57 TFLOPS against 12.29 TFLOPS, on boost clock with 2755 MHz against 2400 MHz, and on ray tracing core count with 32 against 20. Its lower 190 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU make it the less demanding option for system integration, and its 204 mm length fits smaller chassis compared to the Intel card's 300 mm length.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on specification categories where the database has recorded values. It offers 24 GB of memory versus 16 GB, a 192 bit bus versus 128 bit, and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. It has more shading units (2560 versus 2048), more TMUs (160 versus 128), and more ROPs (80 versus 64). Its FP16 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the AMD card's 22.57 TFLOPS. The Intel card uses a newer 5 nm process, has a higher transistor density at 72.1 million per mm², and supports PCIe 5.0 x8. Its 20 ray tracing cores are fewer than AMD's 32, but its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate are higher.

For use cases requiring large memory buffers and high memory bandwidth, such as workloads that fit within 24 GB, the Intel card's specification sheet points in that direction. For tasks relying on FP32 compute, higher boost clocks, or ray tracing core counts, the AMD card has the recorded edge. The absence of Intel benchmark data means those specification advantages cannot be validated with performance scores. The database supports the AMD card as the only verified performer, while the Intel card remains a specification-only entry with no measured results to confirm or deny its potential.