AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Intel Arc Pro B390 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark scores for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 has no benchmark entries available. This absence of data for the Intel part means no direct head-to-head comparison can be constructed from measured results. The AMD card shows an average benchmark score of 17083 across its tested workloads, placing it at the 60th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Looking at the AMD card's raw results, it records 2348 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 92426 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 48366 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its Passmark suite results include 17132 in G3D, 8987 in GPU Compute, 228 in DirectX 9, 167 in DirectX 11, 85 in DirectX 10, and 65 in DirectX 12, with a G2D score of 1030. These scores place it slightly above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, which averages 17037, a 0.3% delta, and just ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17019, a 0.4% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 sits slightly higher at 17208, giving a -0.7% delta against the RX 7600 XT, while the NVIDIA Tesla M4 trails at 16932, a 0.9% delta in favor of the AMD part.

Because the Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head section can only describe the AMD side of the comparison. The Intel part's average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it carries no nearest rival entries. The data shows the RX 7600 XT delivers computable performance across all major API tests, whereas the Arc Pro B390 offers no comparable measured output in the database.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two parts is substantial. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The AMD part is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 190 W TDP, powered by a single 8-pin connector, and requires a 450 W suggested power supply. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is built on the Panther Lake chip using Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. It uses a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Transistor count, die size, and transistor density are not recorded. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with an 80 W TDP, no power connectors, and a system-dependent bus interface. Its memory configuration is entirely system shared, including shared size, type, bus width, and system-dependent bandwidth.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The AMD card runs a base clock of 1980 MHz, a boost of 2755 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel part has a base clock of just 300 MHz and a boost of 2500 MHz, with no game clock recorded and memory listed as system shared. The AMD card carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part has no dedicated memory.

Compute resources also diverge. The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B390 has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores. Pixel rate for the AMD card is 176.3 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 352.6 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 22.57 TFLOPS for AMD versus 7.680 TFLOPS for Intel. FP16 performance is 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1) for AMD versus 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent. The AMD card measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height; the Intel part has no recorded dimensions.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins every category where measured data exists. Its discrete memory subsystem with 16 GB GDDR6 and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth gives it a clear advantage in bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 rate is roughly three times the Intel part's 7.680 TFLOPS, indicating substantially higher raw shader throughput. Texture and pixel fill rates follow the same pattern: 352.6 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s, and 176.3 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 has its own structural advantages based on the recorded specifications. Its 3 nm process node at Intel represents a newer fabrication technology than the 6 nm TSMC node used by AMD. Its 80 W TDP is much lower than the 190 W AMD part, and as an IGP it requires no power connectors and no dedicated power supply recommendation. The Intel part also supports FP16 at 15.36 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, which exceeds its own FP32 rate, a feature that could benefit mixed-precision workloads. Its system shared memory model means capacity scales with the host system rather than being fixed at 16 GB.

The AMD part's 60th percentile ranking against all GPUs confirms its position in the broader performance distribution. The Intel part's 50th percentile is listed, but with an average benchmark score of 0 and no tests recorded, that percentile cannot be validated against actual results. The RX 7600 XT also holds a clear advantage in ray tracing hardware, with 32 RT cores versus 12, and in ROP count, 64 versus 24.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B390 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rival entries.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It scores 0.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, 0.4% above the AMD Radeon HD 7970M, 0.9% above the NVIDIA Tesla M4, and 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The RX 7600 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD card has a 190 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested PSU with one 8-pin connector. The Intel part has an 80 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU.

Q: Which process nodes are used?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses a 6 nm TSMC process. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses a 3 nm Intel process.

Q: Do both support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ, with AMD offering 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while Intel's outputs are portable device dependent.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, uses the Navi 33 chip on RDNA 3.0, and carries the codename Hotpink Bonefish. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses the Panther Lake chip on Xe3-LPG architecture with no series or codename listed. Process nodes are 6 nm TSMC for AMD versus 3 nm Intel for the Arc Pro B390. Transistor count is 13,300 million for AMD versus unknown for Intel, and die size is 204 mm² versus unknown.

Clock speeds differ across the board. AMD lists base 1980 MHz, boost 2755 MHz, game 2470 MHz, and memory 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Intel lists base 300 MHz, boost 2500 MHz, no game clock, and system shared memory. Memory capacity is 16 GB GDDR6 for AMD versus system shared for Intel. Bus width is 128 bit versus system shared. Bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus system dependent.

Compute unit counts differ: AMD has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores; Intel has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. Pixel rate is 176.3 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 352.6 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 22.57 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS. FP16 is 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP is 190 W versus 80 W. Slot width is dual-slot versus IGP. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus none. Suggested PSU is 450 W versus none listed. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus IGP. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable device dependent. Dimensions are 204 mm by 115 mm for AMD, with none recorded for Intel. Release dates are 2024-01-23 for AMD versus 2026-01-26 for Intel. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 329 USD; the Intel part has none. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV; the Intel part's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM with no successor listed. Both are marked as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an asymmetric comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a fully specified discrete graphics card with a complete set of benchmark results, an average score of 17083, and a 60th percentile ranking. The Intel Arc Pro B390 is an integrated processor with no benchmarks, no average score beyond 0, and no rival comparisons.

Based strictly on the database, the RX 7600 XT is the only part with measurable performance. It delivers 22.57 TFLOPS FP32, 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 32 ray tracing cores. It outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 by 0.3%, the AMD Radeon HD 7970M by 0.4%, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 by 0.9%, while trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 by 0.7%.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 offers structural advantages in power consumption and process technology. Its 80 W TDP is less than half the AMD part's 190 W, it requires no external power connectors, and it uses a 3 nm Intel process compared to 6 nm TSMC. Its system shared memory model makes it dependent on host system resources, and its FP16 rate of 15.36 TFLOPS exceeds its FP32 rate of 7.680 TFLOPS.

Users requiring verified discrete GPU performance should select the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. The data supports its use in any workload where measured results matter, from 3DMark Steel Nomad at 2348 to Geekbench OpenCL at 92426. Users constrained to integrated graphics with low power draw and no add-in card requirements would look to the Intel Arc Pro B390, but the database contains no benchmark evidence to validate its performance level. The comparison is decided by data availability: one part has results, the other does not.