AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Intel Arc A770M Comparison

The Intel Arc A770M and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT are two 16 GB graphics solutions aimed at different segments of the market, with the former being an end-of-life mobile part and the latter an active desktop card. Benchmark results show a clear split in performance characteristics, with the AMD card winning 8 of the 10 head-to-head comparisons, but the Intel part delivering a decisive victory in specific API workloads. The average benchmark scores place the Intel card at 18383 and the AMD at 17083, a difference of about 7.6% in favor of Intel, though this aggregate figure is heavily influenced by one outlier test.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic divergence in the data appears in the Geekbench Vulkan test, where the Intel Arc A770M scores 74422 against the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT’s 48366. This represents a 53.9% delta in Intel’s favor, making it the single largest performance gap in either direction across all tested workloads. This result is particularly striking because the AMD card wins the OpenCL variant of the same benchmark suite, scoring 92426 versus Intel’s 89494, a 3.2% margin. The Vulkan result suggests that the Intel architecture has a significant advantage in this specific API path, while the AMD part excels in the more general-purpose compute interface.

Outside of the Vulkan test, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT dominates the remainder of the benchmark suite. In PassMark’s DirectX 11 test, the AMD card scores 167 against Intel’s 69, yielding a 58.7% delta — the largest win for AMD in the entire comparison. The DirectX 10 test shows a similar trend, with AMD leading 85 to 56, a 34.1% margin. The older DirectX 9 workload also favors AMD, with scores of 228 versus 178, a 21.9% advantage. These results indicate that AMD holds a substantial lead in legacy DirectX API performance, which may be relevant for users running older titles or applications that rely on these interfaces.

In the more modern DirectX 12 path, the results are much closer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows AMD winning with 2348 points against Intel’s 2278, a narrow 3% delta. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 test flips the result, with Intel scoring 70 and AMD scoring 65, giving Intel a 7.7% edge. This split suggests that the two cards are competitive in DirectX 12 workloads, with the specific test methodology determining the winner. The 3DMark result is likely the more representative of actual gaming performance, given its use of a modern game-like scene.

The compute-oriented workloads heavily favor AMD. In PassMark GPU Compute, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 8987 compared to Intel’s 4778, a 46.8% delta. This is the second-largest margin in the entire comparison and indicates a significant advantage in general-purpose compute tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL result, while closer at 3.2%, still favors AMD, reinforcing the pattern that the AMD architecture is stronger in compute-heavy applications. The PassMark G2D test also goes to AMD, with scores of 1030 versus 711, a 31% difference, suggesting better 2D graphics performance.

The PassMark G3D test, which aggregates DirectX and OpenGL performance into a single metric, shows AMD winning decisively with 17132 points against Intel’s 11774, a 31.3% delta. This is the most comprehensive gaming-oriented score in the PassMark suite and reinforces AMD’s overall advantage in traditional rasterization workloads. Interestingly, the Intel Arc A770M’s nearest rival list includes the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at a 1.1% delta and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 1.2%, while the AMD RX 7600 XT’s rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 at -0.7%, indicating that these two cards are positioned in different performance tiers relative to their respective competition.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split personality for these two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the stronger all-around performer, winning 8 out of 10 benchmarks, with particularly large margins in DirectX 11 (58.7%), GPU Compute (46.8%), and DirectX 10 (34.1%). For users prioritizing legacy API compatibility, compute workloads, or general 3D gaming performance, the AMD card is the obvious choice based on the benchmark evidence. Its PassMark G3D score of 17132 is 45.5% higher than Intel’s 11774, and its GPU Compute score is nearly double.

The Intel Arc A770M has a narrow but distinct niche. Its 53.9% victory in Geekbench Vulkan is the largest single win in the entire comparison, and it also edges out AMD in PassMark DirectX 12 by 7.7%. For users who specifically need Vulkan performance, particularly in applications that heavily leverage this API, the Intel card offers a substantial advantage. However, this single bright spot is outweighed by AMD’s dominance across the board, making the Intel card a specialized choice rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

The average benchmark scores tell a slightly different story, with Intel at 18383 and AMD at 17083, a 7.6% difference in Intel’s favor. This discrepancy is driven by the Vulkan score’s influence on the average, which inflates Intel’s overall standing despite its losses in the majority of tests. The percentile rankings are nearly identical, with Intel at 62 and AMD at 60, indicating that both cards sit in the same general performance tier relative to all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the better pick for most users, while the Intel Arc A770M is only preferable in Vulkan-centric workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which card wins the most benchmarks in this comparison?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins 8 out of 10 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel Arc A770M wins 2.

Q: What is the largest performance margin in either direction?

A: The Intel Arc A770M’s 53.9% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan is the largest single delta, while AMD’s largest win is 58.7% in PassMark DirectX 11.

Q: How do the two cards compare in DirectX 12 performance?

A: The results are mixed: AMD wins 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 by 3%, but Intel wins PassMark DirectX 12 by 7.7%.

Q: Which card is better for compute workloads?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is significantly better, winning PassMark GPU Compute by 46.8% and Geekbench OpenCL by 3.2%.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has an average score of 18383, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT averages 17083, a 7.6% difference in Intel’s favor.

Q: How do the percentile rankings compare?

A: The Intel Arc A770M ranks at the 62nd percentile, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks at the 60th percentile among all GPUs.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ substantially in their core specifications. The Intel Arc A770M features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is configured with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Both cards have 32 ray tracing cores, but the Intel part’s higher count of execution units is notable. The clock speeds are heavily in AMD’s favor, with the RX 7600 XT boosting to 2755 MHz versus Intel’s 2050 MHz, and a base clock of 1980 MHz versus 1650 MHz.

Memory configurations are also different. Both cards have 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, but the Intel Arc A770M uses a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD card uses a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock differs as well, with Intel at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and AMD at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The power requirements are distinct, with Intel rated at 120 W TDP and AMD at 190 W TDP. The AMD card is a dual-slot design with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W PSU, while the Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no specified power connectors.

The bus interface also differs: Intel uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Physical dimensions are only provided for the AMD card, measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 329 USD, while the Intel card has no listed launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation for Arc 7 Mobile. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and is part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It also uses a 6 nm process at TSMC but with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a higher transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The FP32 compute performance favors AMD, with 22.57 TFLOPS versus Intel’s 16.79 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance is notably different in efficiency: Intel achieves 33.59 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while AMD delivers 22.57 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is higher on Intel at 262.4 GPixel/s versus 176.3 GPixel/s on AMD, but the texture rate favors AMD at 352.6 GTexel/s versus 524.8 GTexel/s on Intel. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Production status differs, with Intel listed as end-of-life and AMD as active, with a release date of 2024-01-23. The AMD card has a defined predecessor in Navi II and successor in Navi IV, while Intel has no listed predecessors or successors. Display outputs vary, with Intel being portable device dependent and AMD offering 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins in the majority of scenarios, particularly those involving legacy DirectX APIs. Its 58.7% lead in DirectX 11 and 34.1% lead in DirectX 10 make it the clear choice for older games and applications that rely on these interfaces. The 21.9% advantage in DirectX 9 further reinforces this pattern. For compute-heavy tasks, the AMD card’s 46.8% lead in GPU Compute and 3.2% lead in OpenCL make it the superior option for rendering, scientific computing, and other general-purpose workloads. The 31.3% advantage in PassMark G3D and 3% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 indicate that for modern gaming, the AMD card is generally faster.

The Intel Arc A770M has a clear win in Vulkan performance, with its 53.9% lead in Geekbench Vulkan being the standout result. This makes it the better choice for applications that are heavily optimized for the Vulkan API, such as certain game engines, emulators, or professional tools that leverage Vulkan compute. The 7.7% win in PassMark DirectX 12 also gives it a narrow edge in that specific benchmark, though the 3DMark result favors AMD. The Intel card’s higher pixel rate of 262.4 GPixel/s versus 176.3 GPixel/s suggests it may have an advantage in fill-rate-bound scenarios, though this is not directly reflected in the benchmark scores.