AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B65 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B65

The database currently holds benchmark records for the AMD Radeon RX 7600, while the Intel Arc Pro B65 has no recorded benchmark scores. The RX 7600’s average benchmark score is 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The Arc Pro B65 has an average score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, meaning no performance data exists for it yet. All comparisons below that reference measured performance therefore rely solely on the RX 7600’s results. The Arc Pro B65’s specifications are fully listed, but its actual runtime behavior remains unmeasured.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database for these two cards. The RX 7600 has ten individual benchmark scores across multiple test suites. The Arc Pro B65 has zero benchmarks listed. Consequently, there are no direct score comparisons, no delta percentages between them, and no wins recorded for either side.

The RX 7600’s recorded scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2310, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 34401. In Passmark tests, it scores 84 in DirectX 10, 172 in DirectX 11, 58 in DirectX 12, 226 in DirectX 9, 984 in G2D, 16634 in G3D, and 8790 in GPU compute. These numbers show that the RX 7600 delivers its highest raw compute output in OpenCL, while its DirectX 12 Passmark score is notably lower than its DirectX 11 and DirectX 9 results.

Because the Arc Pro B65 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot quantify any performance gap. The only meaningful head-to-head statement is that one GPU has an active test history and the other does not. The RX 7600’s nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, which has an average score of 15199 and a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 with a delta of -0.7%, the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at 15082 with a delta of 0.6%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at 15063 with a delta of 0.7%. These deltas indicate that the RX 7600 sits within roughly 1% of those four cards, effectively a statistical tie across the averaged suite.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 wins in every category where measurement exists, simply because the Arc Pro B65 has no recorded scores. The RX 7600’s Passmark G3D score of 16634 shows strong overall graphics performance, while its Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 indicates substantial compute throughput. Its Vulkan score of 34401 reflects solid cross-platform API performance. None of these can be compared to the Arc Pro B65.

The Arc Pro B65’s specification sheet suggests capabilities in areas the RX 7600 does not match, but without benchmarks those remain theoretical. For instance, the Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB of memory, a 256-bit bus, and 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth, all of which exceed the RX 7600’s 8 GB, 128-bit bus, and 288.0 GB/s. That advantage would likely appear in memory-heavy workloads, but the database contains no test to confirm it.

In terms of raw FP32 compute, the RX 7600 lists 21.75 TFLOPS, while the Arc Pro B65 lists 12.29 TFLOPS. That gives the RX 7600 a clear theoretical lead in single-precision floating point. However, the Arc Pro B65 lists 24.58 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, exceeding the RX 7600’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. This means the Intel card should handle half-precision workloads faster, assuming the architecture executes as specified.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and comes from AMD. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². Its predecessor is Navi II, and its successor is Navi IV.

The Arc Pro B65 uses the BMG-G21 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, with no codename listed. It belongs to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation from Intel. The process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². No predecessor or successor is listed.

The transistor counts differ substantially: the Arc Pro B65 packs 19,600 million transistors versus 13,300 million in the RX 7600. The die size also differs, 272 mm² versus 204 mm², and the density is higher on the Intel part. The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operations units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B65 has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. This means the Intel card has more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, but fewer ray tracing cores.

Neither card lists tensor cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so the API feature sets match.

Specification Differences

The RX 7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2655 MHz, and a game clock of 2250 MHz. Its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Arc Pro B65 has a base clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed. Its memory runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed. The Intel card operates at a higher constant clock, while the AMD card boosts much higher than its base.

Memory capacity differs drastically: 8 GB on the RX 7600 versus 32 GB on the Arc Pro B65. Memory type is GDDR6 for both. The bus width is 128 bits on the AMD card and 256 bits on the Intel card. Bandwidth follows accordingly: 288.0 GB/s versus 608.0 GB/s.

FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS for the RX 7600 and 12.29 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B65. FP16 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) for the AMD card and 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Intel card. Pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s for the RX 7600 and 192.0 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro B65. Texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power draw is listed as TDP: 165 W for the RX 7600 and 200 W for the Arc Pro B65. The suggested PSU is 450 W for the AMD card and 550 W for the Intel card. Both are dual-slot and use a single 8-pin power connector. The RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Arc Pro B65 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The RX 7600 has one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Arc Pro B65 has four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and no HDMI.

Physical dimensions are listed only for the RX 7600: 204 mm length (8 inches) and 115 mm height (4.5 inches). The Arc Pro B65 has no dimensions recorded. The RX 7600 has a launch MSRP of 269 USD, which the database lists without further comment. The Arc Pro B65 has no launch MSRP recorded. The RX 7600 was released on 2023-05-24, while the Arc Pro B65 has a release date of 2026-03-31.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The RX 7600 lists 21.75 TFLOPS FP32, while the Arc Pro B65 lists 12.29 TFLOPS FP32. The AMD card leads in single-precision throughput by a wide margin.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card has four times the capacity and more than double the bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 in the database.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Arc Pro B65 has 2560 shading units, while the RX 7600 has 2048. The Intel card also has more TMUs (160 versus 128) and more ROPs (80 versus 64).

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RX 7600 has 32 ray tracing cores, while the Arc Pro B65 has 20. The AMD card has a 60% higher count of RT cores.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The RX 7600 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc Pro B65 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Intel card also has a higher transistor density at 72.1M per mm² versus 65.2M per mm².

The Verdict

The database shows a complete asymmetry. The RX 7600 has measured performance across ten benchmarks, an average score of 15171, and a 57th percentile ranking. The Arc Pro B65 has no benchmarks, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects no data rather than actual performance. Any user choosing between these two cards based on recorded results must select the RX 7600, because it is the only one with demonstrated output.

However, the specification sheet tells a different story for specific workloads. The Arc Pro B65 offers 32 GB of memory versus 8 GB, 608.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s, a 256-bit bus versus 128-bit, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus PCIe 4.0 x8. It also has more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs. These figures point toward the Intel card being the stronger choice for large datasets, high-resolution textures, or compute tasks that exceed 8 GB of memory. The 2:1 FP16 ratio at 24.58 TFLOPS also suggests faster half-precision work, which matters for certain AI and scientific workloads.

The RX 7600 counters with 21.75 TFLOPS FP32, 2655 MHz boost clock, 32 ray tracing cores, and a lower 165 W TDP. The data indicates it will perform better in standard rasterized gaming, ray tracing, and general FP32 compute. Its nearest rivals all sit within 1% of its average score, confirming that it is a mid-pack performer relative to the broader GPU landscape.

For a user with no benchmark data on the Arc Pro B65, the only defensible recommendation from the database is the RX 7600 for any measured workload. For a user who knows the specific memory and FP16 requirements, the Arc Pro B65’s specifications justify consideration, but no recorded test verifies its real-world behavior. The verdict is conditional: the RX 7600 is the proven option, while the Arc Pro B65 remains an unverified specification sheet with clear theoretical strengths in memory capacity and half-precision compute.