AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark entries in the database, resulting in an average benchmark score of zero and no nearest rivals listed. The AMD Radeon RX 7600, by contrast, has ten recorded benchmark scores across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 posts an average benchmark score of 15,171 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking places it at 57, meaning it sits above 57 percent of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rival to the RX 7600 is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, which scores 15,199, a delta of negative 0.2 percent. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15,270, putting it 0.7 percent ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15,082, a delta of positive 0.6 percent for the RX 7600, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15,063, with the RX 7600 ahead by 0.7 percent.

For the RX 7600, the strongest recorded result appears in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2,310. In Geekbench OpenCL, the card reaches 88,051, while Geekbench Vulkan produces 34,401. PassMark G3D shows 16,634, and PassMark GPU Compute shows 8,790. Legacy DirectX tests show PassMark DirectX 9 at 226, DirectX 11 at 172, DirectX 10 at 84, and DirectX 12 at 58. The PassMark G2D result is 984.

Since the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmarks, the database cannot quantify how either card performs relative to the other in any specific workload. The absence of data for the Intel part means any comparison of measured performance is impossible from the recorded information. The AMD card has a measurable footprint in the database, while the Intel card exists only as a specification entry.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and use different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, under the codename Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip built on Xe2-HPG architecture and belongs to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation.

Manufacturing processes differ significantly. AMD fabricates the Navi 33 on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while Intel fabricates the BMG-G21 on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The transistor counts reflect the size difference: AMD packs 13,300 million transistors onto a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. Intel packs 19,600 million transistors onto a 272 mm² die, yielding a density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The Intel die is larger and denser, indicating a more complex design.

Clock behavior diverges as well. The AMD chip has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, with a game clock listed at 2250 MHz. The Intel chip has a higher base clock of 2000 MHz but a lower boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: AMD runs memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while Intel runs memory at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective.

The compute architecture shows distinct layouts. AMD implements 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. Intel implements 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 render output units, and 20 ray tracing cores. Intel has more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, but AMD has more ray tracing cores. Neither card lists tensor cores in the database.

Pixel and texture rates reflect these counts. AMD achieves a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. Intel achieves a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. Intel leads in both rasterization throughput metrics.

Floating-point performance tells a different story. AMD lists FP32 at 21.75 TFLOPS and FP16 at 21.75 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. Intel lists FP32 at 12.29 TFLOPS and FP16 at 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. AMD has nearly double the FP32 throughput, while Intel has higher FP16 throughput. This indicates different compute priorities: AMD emphasizes single-precision work, while Intel emphasizes half-precision throughput.

API support is identical on paper. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data permits only a partial answer to where each card wins, because the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has measurable wins across multiple test categories, but no direct comparison to the Intel part exists.

For the AMD card, the data indicates strength in FP32 compute workloads. The 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 figure is the highest recorded for either card, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,051 suggests capable general-purpose compute performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 34,401 supports this interpretation. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310 provides a modern DirectX 12 gaming data point.

For the Intel card, the specification data suggests strengths in memory capacity and bandwidth. The 24 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus yields 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to the AMD card's 8 GB on a 128 bit bus yielding 288.0 GB/s. The Intel card also has a higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 169.9 GPixel/s, and a higher texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s. These figures indicate potential advantages in memory-heavy workloads and fill-rate-bound scenarios, but without benchmark scores, these remain speculative.

The Intel card's FP16 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the AMD card's 21.75 TFLOPS, suggesting an edge in half-precision compute if the workload uses FP16. The AMD card's FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS more than doubles the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS, indicating a clear advantage in single-precision compute tasks.

The AMD card also wins on ray tracing core count with 32 cores versus Intel's 20. The database does not include ray tracing benchmark scores for either card, so the practical impact of this difference remains unquantified.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field in the database.

Memory capacity: AMD has 8 GB GDDR6, Intel has 24 GB GDDR6. Memory bus width: AMD has 128 bit, Intel has 192 bit. Memory bandwidth: AMD has 288.0 GB/s, Intel has 456.0 GB/s. Memory clock: AMD runs 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, Intel runs 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective.

Shading units: AMD has 2,048, Intel has 2,560. Texture mapping units: AMD has 128, Intel has 160. Render output units: AMD has 64, Intel has 80. Ray tracing cores: AMD has 32, Intel has 20.

Base clock: AMD at 1720 MHz, Intel at 2000 MHz. Boost clock: AMD at 2655 MHz, Intel at 2400 MHz. Game clock: AMD lists 2250 MHz, Intel lists none.

FP32: AMD at 21.75 TFLOPS, Intel at 12.29 TFLOPS. FP16: AMD at 21.75 TFLOPS with 1:1 ratio, Intel at 24.58 TFLOPS with 2:1 ratio.

Pixel rate: AMD at 169.9 GPixel/s, Intel at 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: AMD at 339.8 GTexel/s, Intel at 384.0 GTexel/s.

Process node: AMD on 6 nm, Intel on 5 nm. Transistors: AMD at 13,300 million, Intel at 19,600 million. Die size: AMD at 204 mm², Intel at 272 mm². Transistor density: AMD at 65.2M per mm², Intel at 72.1M per mm².

Power draw: AMD TDP of 165 W, Intel TDP of 400 W. Power connectors: AMD uses 1x 8-pin, Intel uses 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: AMD at 450 W, Intel at 800 W.

Bus interface: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8, Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8.

Display outputs: AMD has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, Intel has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1.

Dimensions: AMD is 204 mm long and 115 mm tall, with no width recorded. Intel is 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.

Release dates: AMD released on 2023-05-24, Intel released on 2025-09-04. The AMD card has a predecessor listed as Navi II and a successor as Navi IV. The Intel card has no predecessor or successor in the database. Both are marked as Active in production status.

Launch MSRP: AMD at 269 USD, Intel at 1,199 USD.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: How do the FP32 compute figures compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. AMD has a substantial lead in single-precision compute.

Q: What is the transistor density difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 65.2 million per square millimeter. Intel also has more total transistors at 19,600 million versus AMD's 13,300 million.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 boosts to 2655 MHz, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual boosts to 2400 MHz. The Intel card has a higher base clock at 2000 MHz versus AMD's 1720 MHz.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W and suggests a 450 W power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W and suggests an 800 W power supply.

The Verdict

The database presents an asymmetric picture. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a full set of benchmark scores, an average score of 15,171, and a percentile ranking of 57. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and a percentile ranking of 50. Without measured data for the Intel card, the database cannot establish a performance hierarchy between the two.

The specification data suggests different design targets. The AMD card prioritizes FP32 compute with 21.75 TFLOPS, a high boost clock of 2655 MHz, and 32 ray tracing cores. It also draws less power at 165 W, uses a single 8-pin connector, and fits in a shorter 204 mm length. The Intel card prioritizes memory capacity with 24 GB, higher bandwidth at 456.0 GB/s, and higher fill rates with 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. It also has more shading units at 2,560 and a higher base clock at 2000 MHz.

The Intel card's 400 W TDP and 800 W suggested power supply indicate a much higher power draw than the AMD card's 165 W and 450 W. The Intel card is also longer at 300 mm versus 204 mm, and uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface versus PCIe 4.0 x8.

The AMD card launched with a launch MSRP of 269 USD, while the Intel card launched with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The release dates differ by over two years, with AMD releasing on 2023-05-24 and Intel on 2025-09-04.

For users focused on measured performance data, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the only card with recorded results. Its nearest rivals all fall within a 1.4 percent band around its average score, indicating the card sits near the middle of a tight performance cluster. For users focused on memory capacity and bandwidth, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual offers specifications that the AMD card cannot match. The choice depends on whether the workload demands the AMD card's FP32 throughput and ray tracing cores, or the Intel card's memory capacity and fill rates. The database does not provide enough measured data on the Intel card to make a performance-based recommendation.