AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Intel Arc A580 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

CORE STATE Navi 21
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2250 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A580

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 175 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,689
2,229
geekbench_metal
181,337
N/A
geekbench_opencl
171,304
91,657
geekbench_vulkan
136,875
79,381
passmark_directx_10
155
N/A
passmark_directx_11
264
N/A
passmark_directx_12
100
N/A
passmark_directx_9
265
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,030
N/A
passmark_g3d
24,980
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
13,245
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Intel Arc A580

The Intel Arc A580 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT occupy very different tiers of the graphics card market, and the benchmark data reflects a clear performance hierarchy. The RX 6800 XT, a high-end RDNA 2 part, dominates the Arc A580 across every single benchmark in the comparison, with the A580 trailing by margins of roughly 40% or more. While the A580 is an active product with a modern architecture, its position is firmly in the mid-range, whereas the RX 6800 XT, though end-of-life, was built to compete at the enthusiast level, and the numbers show this distinction in no uncertain terms.

Where Each One Wins

The performance split between these two cards is one-sided, with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT securing wins in all three available head-to-head benchmarks. There is no test category where the Intel Arc A580 emerges victorious. The data shows a consistent pattern: the RX 6800 XT is the superior choice for any workload represented in the benchmark suite, whether it's a modern DirectX 12 title or a cross-platform compute API.

For users prioritizing raw graphics throughput, the RX 6800 XT is the definitive pick. Its lead in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, a demanding and current benchmark, is substantial. Similarly, in compute-oriented tests like Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 6800 XT's advantage is even more pronounced, suggesting it handles general-purpose GPU tasks with significantly more headroom. The Arc A580, by contrast, offers no benchmark where it can claim a win, positioning it as a less capable option for high-end gaming and compute scenarios.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and process technologies. The Intel Arc A580 utilizes the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 21 chip, built on an older 7 nm process at the same foundry. This gives Intel a manufacturing node advantage, but AMD compensates with a significantly larger and more complex die.

The RX 6800 XT's Navi 21 chip contains 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, while the A580's DG2-512 has 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. Despite the smaller node, the A580 has a higher transistor density at 53.4M per mm² compared to the RX 6800 XT's 51.5M per mm². The RX 6800 XT features a more extensive compute configuration with 4608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs, dwarfing the A580's 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The ray tracing hardware also differs, with the RX 6800 XT packing 72 RT cores versus the A580's 24.

Memory configurations are a major differentiator. The RX 6800 XT comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, double the 8 GB found on the Arc A580. Both cards use a 256-bit memory bus and achieve the same 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, but the extra capacity on the AMD card provides a significant advantage for high-resolution textures and larger datasets. Clock speeds also favor AMD, with the RX 6800 XT boosting to 2250 MHz and featuring a game clock of 2015 MHz, while the A580 boosts to 2000 MHz. The theoretical compute throughput reflects this, with the RX 6800 XT delivering 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus 12.29 TFLOPS for the A580.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of the performance gap. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 3689, while the Intel Arc A580 scores 2229. This represents a 39.6% deficit for the Intel card, a massive margin that places the cards in entirely different performance classes. This test, which is indicative of modern DirectX 12 gaming workloads, shows the RX 6800 XT delivering roughly 65% more raw performance.

The compute benchmarks show an even wider chasm. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 6800 XT posts a score of 171304, while the A580 manages 91657. This 46.5% gap highlights the AMD card's superiority in general-purpose compute tasks, likely due to its higher shading unit count and clock speeds. The story is similar in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RX 6800 XT scores 136875 against the A580's 79381, a 42% difference. For users running Vulkan-based games or compute applications, the RX 6800 XT is unequivocally the stronger performer.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the RX 6800 XT has an average benchmark score of 48477 across all its tested suites, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The Arc A580, however, has a higher average benchmark score of 57756 and sits in the 87th percentile. This apparent contradiction is resolved by noting that the average scores are calculated across different benchmark sets for each card, with the A580's limited benchmark suite (3DMark and Geekbench) skewing its average higher. The direct head-to-head comparisons, which use identical tests, are the more reliable indicator of relative performance, and they universally favor AMD.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally points to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT as the superior graphics card for performance. Users who demand maximum frame rates in demanding games and need substantial compute power should choose the RX 6800 XT. Its 16 GB of memory, higher clock speeds, and greater shader throughput make it a formidable option for high-resolution gaming and content creation, despite its end-of-life status. The RX 6800 XT also offers a wider array of display outputs, including a USB Type-C port, which some users may find convenient.

The Intel Arc A580, while a capable card in its own right, is clearly positioned for a different audience. Given its wins in no benchmarks, it cannot be recommended for users seeking top-tier performance. However, its lower TDP of 175 W versus the RX 6800 XT's 300 W means it requires less power, and its smaller physical footprint may appeal to users with compact builds. The A580 is a fine choice for mainstream 1080p gaming, but it is not in the same performance league as the RX 6800 XT.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has a higher average benchmark score of 57756, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT's 48477. However, this is calculated across different benchmark suites for each card, and in direct head-to-head comparisons, the RX 6800 XT wins all tests.

Q: What is the performance difference in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 3689, while the Intel Arc A580 scores 2229. This gives the RX 6800 XT a 39.6% lead over the A580.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both use a 256-bit memory bus.

Q: What is the TDP of each card?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has a TDP of 175 W, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has a significantly higher TDP of 300 W.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has a boost clock of 2250 MHz, compared to the Intel Arc A580's boost clock of 2000 MHz.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the Intel Arc A580 wins?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmarks, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT wins all three tests: 3DMark Steel Nomad, Geekbench OpenCL, and Geekbench Vulkan.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6800 XT
A580
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,608
3,072 -33.3%
Shaders
4,608
3,072 -33.3%
TMUs
288
192 -33.3%
ROPs
128
96 -25.0%
Compute Units
72
Execution Units
384
Clocks
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
2000 MHz
Game Clock
2015 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
8,192 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
512.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
128 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
192.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
648.0 GTexel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
20.74 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,296.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
1.536 TFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
41.47 TFLOPS (2:1)
24.58 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
72
24 -66.7%
XMX Cores
384
Power
TDP
300 W
175 W
TDP (W)
300
175 -41.7%
Suggested PSU
700 W
450 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 21
DG2-512
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
Alchemist (Arc 5)
Process Size
7 nm
6 nm
Transistors
26,800 million
21,700 million
Die Size
520 mm²
406 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.5M / mm²
53.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
120 mm 4.7 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.12x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
649 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Navi
Xe Graphics
Successor
Navi III
Battlemage
View Radeon RX 6800 XT Details View Arc A580 Details