AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

CORE STATE Navi 22
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2600 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

CORE STATE GB206
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1455 MHz
TDP 45 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,548
3,013.5
geekbench_metal
137,249
N/A
geekbench_opencl
16,360
96,969
geekbench_vulkan
98,089
96,451
passmark_directx_10
125
119
passmark_directx_11
180
168
passmark_directx_12
80
87
passmark_directx_9
263
203
passmark_g2d
972
876
passmark_g3d
20,700
18,852
passmark_gpu_compute
9,550
7,607

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

# AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

The database record places the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile as direct competitors in the mid-range mobile and desktop GPU space. The RX 6750 XT is a desktop card built on the RDNA 2 architecture, while the RTX 5060 Mobile is a laptop-focused part on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The data shows a clear split in workload preferences, with the AMD card winning 7 out of 10 benchmark comparisons, and the NVIDIA card taking 3. This is not a uniform victory, but a workload-dependent one.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head benchmark data reveals a distinct pattern. The AMD RX 6750 XT dominates in legacy DirectX workloads and compute-heavy synthetic tests. Its wins come in Passmark DirectX 9, DirectX 10, DirectX 11, G2D, G3D, and GPU Compute, often by significant margins. The NVIDIA card, conversely, wins decisively in the new Steel Nomad DX12 test and the OpenCL Geekbench workload, indicating a strength in modern API-heavy, asynchronous compute scenarios.

The split is telling. The AMD card tends to win in older, fixed-function pipelines and compute tests. The NVIDIA card wins in the newest DirectX 12 workload and the OpenCL test, which often rewards rapid scheduling and async compute. The delta percentages highlight this: the NVIDIA card is over 15% faster in Steel Nomad DX12, but over 83% faster in Geekbench OpenCL. Conversely, the AMD card is nearly 30% faster in Passmark DirectX 9 and 25.5% faster in GPU Compute.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge sharply in process node and memory. The AMD card uses a 7 nm process at TSMC and packs 17.2 billion transistors on a 335 mm² die. The NVIDIA card uses a 5 nm process at TSMC and fits 21.9 billion transistors on a much smaller 181 mm² die. The density difference is striking: AMD reaches 51.3 million transistors per mm², while NVIDIA reaches 121.0 million per mm², a figure over twice as high, indicating a much tighter integration.

Memory configurations also differ. The AMD card carries 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, achieving 384.0 GB/s. The AMD card has a wider bus and more memory, but the newer GDDR7 memory shows a strong bandwidth result per pin. Clock speeds tell a similar story: AMD has a 2150 MHz base and 2600 MHz boost, while NVIDIA runs at 952 MHz base and 1455 MHz boost. AMD's raw clock advantage is clear, though the NVIDIA memory clock translates to a 24 Gbps effective rate.

The functional blocks differ. The AMD chip has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores. The NVIDIA chip has 3328 shaders, 104 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 26 RT cores, and 104 tensor cores. NVIDIA's tensor core presence is for AI and RT features, while AMD relies on raw shader count and ray tracing hardware. The NVIDIA card also has a much higher pixel rate: 69.84 GPixel/s vs 166.4 GPixel/s for the AMD card. The texture rate also favors AMD: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 151.3 GTexel/s.

The board dimensions also differ. The AMD card is 267 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, a dual-slot card. The NVIDIA is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no slot width specified.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The scores tell a clear story of specialization. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the NVIDIA RTX 5060 Mobile scores 3013.5 against the AMD's 2548, a 15.4% deficit. The delta is reversed in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where AMD scores 16360 and NVIDIA 96969, a massive 83.1% reverse. In Geekbench Vulkan, the AMD card takes a narrow 1.7% lead (98089 vs 96451). The Passmark DirectX 10 and 11 tests both favor AMD: 125 vs 119 (5% lead) and 180 vs 168 (7.1%). The Passmark DX12 test favors NVIDIA 80 vs 87 (8% lead). DirectX 9 test is heavily AMD: 263 vs 203, a 29.6% lead. The 2D test is AMD with 972 vs 876 (11%), the 3D test AMD with 20700 vs 18852 (9.8%), and the GPU compute test is AMD with 9550 vs 7607, 25.5% ahead.

The data suggests the RX 6750 XT has more raw rasterization and fixed-function throughput, while the RTX 5060 Mobile has a modern, asymmetric compute advantage in new APIs. The GeForce's OpenCL score is an extreme outlier, suggesting that in synthetic compute workloads it is a different class of chip, despite its lower conventional raster score.

The Verdict

The data is clear on one point: these are not interchangeable GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the stronger card in synthetic DirectX 9 through 11 workloads, and in 2D and 3D rasterization. It also carries more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB) and a wider 192-bit bus, which helps at high resolutions and textures. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the better card in the newest DirectX 12 workload and in OpenCL/Vulkan compute, where it shows a massive scheduling advantage. The NVIDIA also draws far less power at 45 W TDP, and is an integrated mobile chip.

For an all-around desktop GPU with an emphasis on classic gaming, the AMD card is the data-backed pick. For a laptop with the latest API workloads and compute, the NVIDIA card is the one.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 3013.5, beating the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT's 2548 by 15.4%.

Q: Does the AMD card win any test?

A: Yes. The RX 6750 XT wins 7 of 10 benchmarks. It wins OpenCL 16360 vs 96969, Vulkan 98089 vs 96451, and Passmark DirectX 9, 10, 11, 2D, 3D, and GPU Compute. It also wins Passmark DX9 by 29.6% and GPU Compute by 25.5%.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7. AMD's memory bus is 192-bit, NVIDIA's is 128-bit.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA card has 3328 shaders, the AMD has 2560.

Q: What architecture does each card use?

A: The AMD RX 6750 XT uses RDNA 2.0 (Navi 22) on a 7nm TSMC process. The RTX 5060 Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0 (GB206) on TSMC 5nm.

Q: Which card has the highest TMU count?

A: The AMD RX 6750 XT has 160 TMUs, the NVIDIA RTX 5060 Mobile has 104 TMUs.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 17,200 million | 21,900 million |

| Die size | 335 mm² | 181 mm² |

| Transistor density | 51.3M / mm² | 121.0M / mm² |

| Memory | 12 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR7 |

| Bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |

| Bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |

| Shaders | 2560 | 3328 |

| TMUs | 160 | 104 |

| ROPs | 64 | 48 |

| RT cores | 40 | 26 |

| Tensor cores | 0 | 104 |

| Pixel rate | 166.4 GPixel/s | 69.84 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 416.0 GTexel/s | 151.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 13.31 TFLOPS | 9.684 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.684 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 250 W | 45 W |

| Slot width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Release | 2022-03-02 | 2025-05-19 |

| Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Predecessor | Navi | GeForce 40 Mobile |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6750 XT
RTX 5060 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
3,328 +30.0%
Shaders
2,560
3,328 +30.0%
TMUs
160
104 -35.0%
ROPs
64
48 -25.0%
Compute Units
40
—
SM Count
—
26
Clocks
Base Clock
2150 MHz
952 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1455 MHz
Game Clock
2495 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 24 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
8,192 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
192 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
432.0 GB/s
384.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
32 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
69.84 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
151.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
13.31 TFLOPS
9.684 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
832.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
151.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
26.62 TFLOPS (2:1)
9.684 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
26 -35.0%
Tensor Cores
—
104
Power
TDP
250 W
45 W
TDP (W)
250
45 -82.0%
Suggested PSU
600 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 22
GB206
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
7 nm
5 nm
Transistors
17,200 million
21,900 million
Die Size
335 mm²
181 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.3M / mm²
121.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
—
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Navi
GeForce 40 Mobile
Successor
Navi III
—
View Radeon RX 6750 XT Details View GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Details