AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro A60 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB are both active, 12 GB graphics cards aimed at different segments of the market. Benchmark data shows the AMD card holds a decisive lead in the one shared Vulkan test, while the Intel card counters with a higher overall percentile ranking. This analysis breaks down the architectural, specification, and performance differences between the two based solely on the provided data.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a higher average benchmark score of 60326, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB's 55698. The Intel card also holds a slightly higher percentile rank among all GPUs at 88, versus the AMD card's 87.

Q: How do the two compare in the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB achieves a score of 108994, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 57166. This gives the AMD card a 47.6% lead in that specific benchmark.

Q: What are the differences in their process nodes and transistor counts?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses a 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB uses a larger 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has a significantly higher boost clock of 2581 MHz, compared to the Intel Arc Pro A60's boost clock of 2050 MHz.

Q: What is the difference in their thermal design power (TDP)?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a TDP of 130 W and suggests a 300 W power supply, whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has a higher TDP of 250 W and suggests a 600 W power supply.

Q: Do both cards support the same modern APIs?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Pro A60 and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures from their respective manufacturers. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-256 chip, which is part of the Alchemist generation for the Pro Series. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 269 mm² and a transistor count of 11,500 million, resulting in a density of 42.8M transistors per mm².

In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and uses the Navi 22 chip, belonging to the Navi II generation of the RX 6000 series. This chip is also fabricated by TSMC, but on a 7 nm process, leading to a larger die size of 335 mm² and a higher transistor count of 17,200 million. Its transistor density is 51.3M per mm², which is higher than the Intel chip's density despite the older process node. The AMD card has a predecessor listed as "Navi" and a successor of "Navi III," while the Intel card has no listed predecessor or successor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data provides only one direct head-to-head comparison between the two cards: the Geekbench Vulkan test. In this benchmark, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB achieves a score of 108994, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 57166. This represents a 47.6% performance advantage for the AMD card in this specific compute workload, a substantial difference that underscores the raw compute power of the RDNA 2.0 architecture in this test.

While this is the only shared benchmark, the overall average benchmark scores tell a different story. The Intel Arc Pro A60's average score is 60326, which places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD card's average score is 55698, placing it in the 87th percentile. This suggests that the Intel card performs better across a broader range of tests, even though it loses the single Vulkan test by a wide margin. The Intel card's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 with an average score of 60347, showing a delta of 0%. The AMD card's closest rival is the AMD Radeon 8060S with a score of 55757, a delta of -0.1%.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal significant differences in core configuration and clock speeds. The Intel Arc Pro A60 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 render output units (ROPs). It also includes 16 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 900 MHz and its boost clock is 2050 MHz, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is configured with a higher number of cores: 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also has more ray tracing cores at 40. Its clock speeds are substantially higher, with a base of 2321 MHz, a game clock of 2439 MHz, and a boost of 2581 MHz. The memory clock is also faster at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This leads to higher theoretical performance rates, with the AMD card delivering 413.0 GTexel/s and 13.21 TFLOPS FP32, compared to the Intel card's 262.4 GTexel/s and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32.

Memory specifications are similar in capacity but differ in bandwidth. Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. However, the AMD card achieves a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, while the Intel card is limited to 384.0 GB/s. Power and physical requirements also differ greatly; the Intel card has a TDP of 130 W and is a single-slot design, while the AMD card has a TDP of 250 W, is a dual-slot design, and requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector. The AMD card is also larger, measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs differ, with the Intel card offering 4x DisplayPort 2.0 and the AMD card offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB wins in raw compute performance as measured by the Geekbench Vulkan benchmark, posting a 47.6% higher score. Its higher core count, clock speeds, and memory bandwidth make it the clear victor in this specific test. The data suggests it is better suited for workloads that heavily leverage the Vulkan API for parallel processing.

The Intel Arc Pro A60 wins on overall benchmark consistency, as indicated by its higher average benchmark score of 60326 and its superior percentile rank of 88. Despite having lower clock speeds and fewer cores, its average performance across the board is higher, suggesting it may have more balanced drivers or architectural advantages for a wider variety of tasks. It also wins on power efficiency, with a significantly lower TDP of 130 W and a more modest 300 W power supply requirement, making it a more efficient choice for systems where power draw is a primary concern. Its single-slot design is also a distinct advantage for space-constrained builds.

The Verdict

The choice between these two cards depends heavily on the user's priorities. For users who prioritize peak performance in Vulkan-based applications and need the maximum raw throughput, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is the clear pick, as its 108994 score in the Geekbench Vulkan test is nearly double that of the Intel Arc Pro A60. This card also offers higher memory bandwidth and a larger number of shading units and ray tracing cores.

Conversely, for users who need a more well-rounded, efficient card that performs well across a wider range of benchmarks, the Intel Arc Pro A60 is the better option. Its higher average benchmark score and superior percentile ranking indicate a strong overall performance profile. Its low TDP and single-slot form factor make it ideal for professional workstations or systems with limited space and power budgets. The data suggests the Intel card is a specialist in efficiency and consistent performance, while the AMD card is a specialist in raw compute power for specific workloads.