GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6600M

CORE STATE Navi 23

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2416 MHz

TDP 100 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

Intel

GPU

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

CORE STATE DG1

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz

TDP 25 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

1,495

N/A

geekbench_metal

92,237

N/A

geekbench_opencl

67,765

14,315

geekbench_vulkan

73,740

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

136

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

184

N/A

passmark_g2d

728

N/A

passmark_g3d

13,929

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

5,646

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Examining the test results for Radeon RX 6600 and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, a definite pattern unfolds. Radeon RX 6600 steadily produces stronger FPS in the benchmarking. The performance lead spans from significant to impressive according to the individual title. Such reliability attests to inherent architectural advantages. Those prioritizing gaming power would consider this.

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics has difficulty to match Radeon RX 6600's raw power. In budget buyers, Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics may nevertheless offer sufficient frame rates, though people needing maximum performance should lean toward Radeon RX 6600. The benchmark margin is sufficiently substantial to dismiss. Heavy scenarios notably reveal this disparity. This cost difference delivers returns in visual quality.

When those facing a purchase decision, Radeon RX 6600 stands as the suggested selection. The steady performance edge over Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics renders it the more logical choice for demanding users. Evaluate your personal requirements, though the evidence guides toward Radeon RX 6600. Reach an wise determination. This gaming difference is significant and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6600M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,792

768 -57.1%

Shaders

1,792

768 -57.1%

TMUs

112

48 -57.1%

ROPs

24 -62.5%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2068 MHz

300 MHz

Boost Clock

2416 MHz

1650 MHz

Game Clock

2177 MHz

—

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

2133 MHz 4.3 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

4,096 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

LPDDR4X

Memory Bus

128 bit

Bandwidth

224.0 GB/s

68.26 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

2 MB

1024 KB

L3 Cache

32 MB

16 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

154.6 GPixel/s

39.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

270.6 GTexel/s

79.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

8.659 TFLOPS

2.534 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

541.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

17.32 TFLOPS (2:1)

5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Power

TDP

100 W

25 W

TDP (W)

100

25 -75.0%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

—

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Generation 12.1

GPU Name

Navi 23

DG1

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Xe Graphics

Process Size

7 nm

10 nm

Transistors

11,060 million

—

Die Size

237 mm²

95 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Density

46.7M / mm²

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Graphics

Successor

—

Alchemist

View Radeon RX 6600M Details View Iris Xe MAX Graphics Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 6600M

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons