GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

CORE STATE Navi 24
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2840 MHz
TDP 80 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
GPU

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

CORE STATE DG1
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
42,536
14,315
geekbench_vulkan
50,867
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Reviewing the test numbers for the AMD RX 6550 and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, a distinct trend appears. the AMD RX 6550 repeatedly provides better frame rates in our testing. This benchmark lead spans from significant to outstanding relative to the particular scenario. This reliability testifies to underlying technical advantages. Those seeking rendering capability should pay attention.

The graphics memory edge of the AMD RX 6550 gets progressively significant at demanding settings. Demanding gaming needs significant VRAM, and the AMD RX 6550 provides extra capacity. The translates into better experiences in demanding workloads. Modern software can continually consume extra video memory. The edge increases over releases.

Gaming benchmarks across diverse resolutions consistently support the AMD RX 6550. From esports genres to heavy titles, the AMD RX 6550 keeps its edge. This gaming steadiness over diverse workloads indicates underlying architectural benefits. Users might expect excellent experiences irrespective of scenario. This flexibility is outstanding.

When all is said and done: the AMD RX 6550 secures this battle obviously. Buyers valuing graphics power would strongly consider the AMD RX 6550 over Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics. This score results supports this recommendation. Your scenarios might execute substantially faster. It's a straightforward champion in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6550M
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
768 -25.0%
Shaders
1,024
768 -25.0%
TMUs
64
48 -25.0%
ROPs
32
24 -25.0%
Compute Units
16
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
2840 MHz
1650 MHz
Game Clock
2560 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
2133 MHz 4.3 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
4,096 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
LPDDR4X
Memory Bus
64 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
144.0 GB/s
68.26 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
1024 KB
1024 KB
L3 Cache
16 MB
16 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
90.88 GPixel/s
39.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
181.8 GTexel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.816 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
363.5 GFLOPS (1:16)
633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
11.63 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
Power
TDP
80 W
25 W
TDP (W)
80
25 -68.8%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Generation 12.1
GPU Name
Navi 24
DG1
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)
Xe Graphics
Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Transistors
5,400 million
Die Size
107 mm²
95 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Density
50.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
Graphics
Successor
Alchemist
View Radeon RX 6550M Details View Iris Xe MAX Graphics Details