GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

CORE STATE Navi 24

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2840 MHz

TDP 80 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Arc A380

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 6 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz

TDP 75 W

BUS WIDTH 96 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

42,536

38,224

geekbench_vulkan

50,867

36,736

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

808

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

N/A

610

passmark_g3d

N/A

6,252

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

2,762

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs Intel Arc A380

Analyzing the test numbers for AMD's RX 6550 and Arc A380 (Intel), a clear trend unfolds. AMD's RX 6550 reliably achieves higher scores in this testing. The rendering superiority extends from substantial to remarkable depending on the specific scenario. Such reliability testifies to core technical benefits. Consumers wanting visual performance should factor this in.

This memory edge of AMD's RX 6550 turns progressively significant at elevated quality levels. 4K scenarios requires substantial memory, and AMD's RX 6550 offers extra headroom. This converts into improved frame rates in memory-intensive scenarios. Upcoming releases will progressively demand additional video memory. The edge widens over releases.

All things considered, AMD's RX 6550 provides the superior option in this matchup. Its benchmark advantages validate evaluation for anyone putting together a powerful rendering rig. Even though Arc A380 (Intel) possesses its merits, the performance numbers clearly advantages AMD's RX 6550. Reach your choice accordingly. The performance delta is substantial sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6550M

A380

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

1,024 0.0%

Shaders

1,024

1,024 0.0%

TMUs

64 0.0%

ROPs

32 0.0%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

128

Clocks

Base Clock

2000 MHz

Boost Clock

2840 MHz

2050 MHz

Game Clock

2560 MHz

—

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

6 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

6,144 +50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

96 bit

Bandwidth

144.0 GB/s

186.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

1024 KB

4 MB

L3 Cache

16 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

90.88 GPixel/s

65.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

181.8 GTexel/s

131.2 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.816 TFLOPS

4.198 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

363.5 GFLOPS (1:16)

1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

11.63 TFLOPS (2:1)

8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

8 -50.0%

XMX Cores

—

128

Power

TDP

80 W

75 W

TDP (W)

75 -6.3%

Suggested PSU

—

250 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 24

DG2-128

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Alchemist (Arc 3)

Process Size

6 nm

Transistors

5,400 million

7,200 million

Die Size

107 mm²

157 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

50.5M / mm²

45.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

222 mm 8.7 inches

Height

—

114 mm 4.5 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x4

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

—

149 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon RX 6550M Details View Arc A380 Details