AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT occupy different corners of the GPU market, one a modern mobile part built on 5 nm and the other a 2020 desktop card on 7 nm. The RTX 4060 Mobile leads in 8 of 9 head-to-head benchmarks, often by substantial margins, while the RX 5600 XT claims only a single 2D test win. However, the RX 5600 XT is a dual-slot desktop card with a 150 W TDP, whereas the RTX 4060 Mobile is an integrated mobile part with a 115 W TDP, so the comparison is not purely about raw performance.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT's 20713. The RTX 4060 Mobile's average is 9.7% higher, and its percentile rank among all GPUs is 67 versus 66 for the RX 5600 XT.

Q: How large is the lead in the most demanding DirectX 12 test?

A: In the Passmark DirectX 12 test, the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 73 against the RX 5600 XT's 52, a delta of 40.4%. The RTX 4060 Mobile also leads in DirectX 11 by 63.5% and DirectX 10 by 46.6%.

Q: Does the RX 5600 XT win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the RX 5600 XT wins the Passmark G2D (2D graphics) test with a score of 870 versus 730 for the RTX 4060 Mobile, a delta of -16.1% in favor of the AMD card. This is the only head-to-head test the RX 5600 XT wins.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 Mobile's lead consistent across different API types?

A: The lead is consistent in compute and modern APIs. The RTX 4060 Mobile is 59.3% ahead in Geekbench Vulkan and 30.5% ahead in Geekbench OpenCL. In the older Passmark DirectX 9 test, the lead narrows to just 6.9% (216 vs 202).

Q: What are the nearest rivals to each card, based on average score?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (avg 22895, -0.7% delta), followed by the Intel Arc B580 (23021, -1.3%) and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (22549, +0.8%). The RX 5600 XT's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, +0.2%) and the Intel Arc A750 (20582, +0.6%).

Q: What is the difference in process node and transistor density?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile uses a 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a density of 118.9M / mm². The RX 5600 XT uses a 7 nm process with 10,300 million transistors on a 251 mm² die, yielding a density of 41.0M / mm².

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent two generations of design philosophy. The RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9M / mm². The RX 5600 XT uses the RDNA 1.0 architecture on the Navi 10 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process, with 10,300 million transistors on a larger 251 mm² die, resulting in a much lower density of 41.0M / mm².

The RTX 4060 Mobile has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It also includes 24 dedicated ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, which the RX 5600 XT completely lacks (both fields are null). The RX 5600 XT has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, favoring texture and pixel throughput. The RTX 4060 Mobile's FP32 compute is 11.61 TFLOPS, while the RX 5600 XT delivers 7.188 TFLOPS. However, the RX 5600 XT has a higher FP16 rate of 14.38 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), compared to the RTX 4060 Mobile's 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory configurations differ significantly. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and 16 Gbps effective speed. The RX 5600 XT has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a higher bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s but a lower 12 Gbps effective speed. The API support also diverges: the RTX 4060 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the RX 5600 XT is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The physical form factors are opposite. The RTX 4060 Mobile is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and no display outputs of its own, being portable-device dependent. The RX 5600 XT is a dual-slot desktop card, 267 mm (10.5 inches) long, requiring a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins 8 of 9 direct comparisons, with margins ranging from modest to dominant. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 89420 versus 68537 for the RX 5600 XT, a 30.5% lead. The gap widens in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 89569 against 56218, a 59.3% advantage. These results indicate a strong compute and graphics API performance edge for the NVIDIA part.

Passmark results tell a similar story across DirectX versions. In DirectX 10, the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 107 versus 73, a 46.6% lead. DirectX 11 shows the largest delta of the entire comparison: 157 versus 96, a 63.5% advantage for the RTX 4060 Mobile. DirectX 12 results are closer but still decisive: 73 versus 52, a 40.4% lead. The oldest test, DirectX 9, is the closest, with the RTX 4060 Mobile scoring 216 against 202, just 6.9% ahead.

In the overall Passmark G3D (3D) test, the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 17469 versus 13457, a 29.8% lead. The Passmark GPU Compute test shows a narrower margin: 6816 versus 6296, an 8.3% lead for the RTX 4060 Mobile. The only win for the RX 5600 XT is in Passmark G2D, where it scores 870 versus 730, a -16.1% delta. This 2D advantage is notable but does not offset the 3D and compute deficits.

The average benchmark scores corroborate the head-to-head results: 22729 for the RTX 4060 Mobile versus 20713 for the RX 5600 XT. The RTX 4060 Mobile's nearest rival, the RTX 2080, is only 0.7% ahead, while the RX 5600 XT sits just 0.2% ahead of the R9 M390X. This places the two cards in different performance tiers despite the RX 5600 XT's older architecture.

The Verdict

The data makes a clear case for the RTX 4060 Mobile in nearly every performance metric. It leads by 59.3% in Vulkan, 63.5% in DirectX 11, and 30.5% in OpenCL. It also has more memory (8 GB vs 6 GB), a smaller process node (5 nm vs 7 nm), and superior API support including ray tracing cores and tensor cores. The RX 5600 XT's sole advantage is in 2D graphics, where it is 16.1% faster, and it offers higher raw bandwidth (288.0 GB/s vs 256.0 GB/s) and more TMUs and ROPs.

However, the RTX 4060 Mobile is a mobile IGP with a 115 W TDP, while the RX 5600 XT is a desktop card with a 150 W TDP and a 450 W suggested PSU. This is not a like-for-like comparison in terms of use case. The RTX 4060 Mobile is designed for laptops, whereas the RX 5600 XT requires a desktop slot and power connector. The RX 5600 XT is also end-of-life, with a release date of 2020-01-20, while the RTX 4060 Mobile is active, released 2023-01-02.

For a laptop buyer, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the clear choice based on performance and feature set. For a desktop user with an existing 450 W PSU, the RX 5600 XT remains a viable option but is outperformed in 3D workloads. The RTX 4060 Mobile also has a higher percentile rank (67 vs 66), indicating it sits slightly better among all GPUs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |

| Transistors | 18,900 million | 10,300 million |

| Die Size | 159 mm² | 251 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 118.9M / mm² | 41.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1545 MHz | 1130 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz | 1560 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 2304 |

| TMUs | 96 | 144 |

| ROPs | 48 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 24 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 96 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 90.72 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 224.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.61 TFLOPS | 7.188 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.38 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 115 W | 150 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins in compute and modern graphics APIs. Its 59.3% lead in Geekbench Vulkan and 30.5% lead in OpenCL make it the stronger choice for GPU-accelerated workloads, including those leveraging DX12 Ultimate features. The 63.5% lead in DirectX 11 and 46.6% in DirectX 10 show broad compatibility with existing games. The inclusion of 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores gives it capabilities the RX 5600 XT cannot match, particularly for ray-traced effects and AI-based features. Its higher average score (22729 vs 20713) and higher percentile (67 vs 66) reinforce its overall superiority.

The RX 5600 XT wins specifically in 2D graphics, with a 16.1% higher Passmark G2D score. It also has a higher memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s vs 256.0 GB/s) due to a wider 192-bit bus, and more TMUs (144 vs 96) and ROPs (64 vs 48), which could benefit texture-heavy or pixel-bound workloads at lower resolutions. Its FP16 performance of 14.38 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 4060 Mobile's 11.61 TFLOPS, though this is less relevant for standard gaming. The RX 5600 XT is a desktop card with a 267 mm length, dual-slot design, and 1x 8-pin connector, making it suitable for users with a 450 W PSU. Its launch MSRP was 279 USD. For those building a desktop system on a strict power budget, the RX 5600 XT remains a functional choice, but the benchmark data consistently favors the RTX 4060 Mobile in 3D and compute scenarios.