AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 occupy entirely different tiers of the graphics card market, as evidenced by the benchmark data. The RTX 4080 is in a higher performance class, while the RX 5600 OEM sits in a lower one, and the data shows a massive performance gulf between them. This analysis breaks down where each card excels, the architectural differences that drive the separation, and how they compare in head-to-head testing.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results are unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 wins every single head-to-head test in the data. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM records zero wins, while the RTX 4080 takes both available benchmarks. This is not a close contest. The RTX 4080 dominates in both OpenCL and Vulkan compute workloads, reflecting its position as a high-end enthusiast card from the GeForce 40-series.

For the RX 5600 OEM, its wins are found only in context of its own peer group. It sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, which is respectable for a mid-range part from the Radeon RX 5000 series. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A570M, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, and Intel Arc A580, with performance deltas ranging from -0.8% to +0.6%. This places it in a tightly contested cluster where small margins separate competitors. The RX 5600 OEM is competitive within its own tier, but it is simply outclassed by the RTX 4080.

The RTX 4080, by contrast, sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (0.1% faster), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (1.1% slower), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (2.6% slower), and AMD Radeon 8060S (2.7% slower). The data shows the RTX 4080 is essentially tied with its SUPER variant and comfortably ahead of the AMD alternatives in its immediate range. Where the RX 5600 OEM fights for scraps in its tier, the RTX 4080 sits near the top of its own.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures that explain their performance separation. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses the Navi 10 chip based on RDNA 1.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a more advanced 5 nm process, also at TSMC.

The transistor counts tell a stark story. The RX 5600 OEM packs 10,300 million transistors on a 251 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 41.0 million per mm². The RTX 4080 carries 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1 million per mm². That is over four times the transistor count and nearly three times the density, reflecting both the newer process node and the larger chip.

Core configurations differ dramatically. The RX 5600 OEM has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The RTX 4080 has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The RTX 4080 also includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, features entirely absent from the RX 5600 OEM, which has no dedicated RT or tensor hardware. This makes the RTX 4080 a far more capable part for ray-traced workloads and AI-accelerated tasks.

Memory subsystems also diverge. The RX 5600 OEM uses 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4080 uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s. That is more than double the memory capacity and roughly 2.5 times the bandwidth. Clock speeds are higher on the RTX 4080 as well, with a base of 2205 MHz and boost of 2505 MHz, compared to 1130 MHz base and 1560 MHz boost on the RX 5600 OEM.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data contains two benchmarks, and both are decisive victories for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 5600 OEM scores 62427, while the RTX 4080 scores 214739. That gives the RTX 4080 a 70.9% advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, the gap is even wider: the RX 5600 OEM scores 53743, while the RTX 4080 scores 263779. The delta here is 79.6%. These are not marginal differences; they represent a generational and tier-level gulf.

Looking at the broader benchmark suite available for the RTX 4080, the picture is consistent. It scores 34457 in Passmark G3D, 20671 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 6567 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The RX 5600 OEM has no comparable scores in those tests, but its average benchmark score across all tests is 58085, versus 54247 for the RTX 4080. This average is misleading because the RTX 4080 includes far more demanding tests in its average, yet it still lands close to the RX 5600 OEM’s figure. The individual head-to-head results are the more reliable indicator, and they show a clear hierarchy.

The RTX 4080’s Vulkan score of 263779 is particularly strong, representing a 79.6% lead. This suggests the Ada Lovelace architecture has a substantial advantage in Vulkan workloads. The OpenCL score of 214739, while slightly smaller in percentage terms, is still a dominant 70.9% lead. For any workload that leverages compute APIs, the RTX 4080 is in a different league.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM has a higher average benchmark score of 58085, compared to 54247 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. However, this is because the RTX 4080’s average includes more diverse and demanding tests, while the head-to-head results show the RTX 4080 winning by 70.9% to 79.6%.

Q: Does the RX 5600 OEM have ray tracing cores?

A: No. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RX 5600 OEM has 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth with 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The RTX 4080 has 716.8 GB/s with 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How do their percentiles compare?

A: The RX 5600 OEM sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 4080 sits at the 86th percentile. Despite the RTX 4080’s higher absolute performance, both cards are in similar percentile ranges due to the distribution of scores across all GPUs.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has a boost clock of 2505 MHz, while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM has a boost clock of 1560 MHz.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The RX 5600 OEM has 10,300 million transistors, while the RTX 4080 has 45,900 million transistors. The RTX 4080 also has a higher transistor density at 121.1M per mm² versus 41.0M per mm².

The Verdict

The data is clear: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the superior card by a wide margin. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks decisively, with leads of 70.9% in OpenCL and 79.6% in Vulkan. It offers more than double the memory capacity and bandwidth, a much larger core configuration, and dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware. For anyone needing maximum compute performance, the RTX 4080 is the obvious choice.

The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is not a bad card within its own context. It holds the 87th percentile among all GPUs and is competitive with its nearest rivals, trading blows with the Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT within a 1% margin. It is a capable mid-range part for its era, but it cannot compete with the RTX 4080’s raw power.

The choice between these two is not really a choice. The RTX 4080 is for users who need top-tier performance and are willing to accept its 320 W TDP, triple-slot cooler, and 16-pin power connector. The RX 5600 OEM is for users who are constrained to a 125 W TDP, dual-slot form factor, and 1x 8-pin power connector, and who are satisfied with its 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB memory. The benchmark scores dictate the verdict: the RTX 4080 wins outright.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 10,300 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 251 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 41.0M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1130 MHz | 2205 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2505 MHz |

| Memory Size | 6 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus | 192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 716.8 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 9728 |

| TMUs | 128 | 304 |

| ROPs | 64 | 112 |

| RT Cores | None | 76 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 304 |

| Pixel Rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 280.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 761.5 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.390 TFLOPS | 48.74 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) | 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 125 W | 320 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 700 W |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Release Date | 2020-01-20 | 2022-09-19 |

| Launch MSRP | Not available | 1,199 USD |

| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |