AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100 Comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and AMD Radeon RX 560 XT occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, and benchmark data confirms a decisive performance gap. The Quadro GV100 wins both shared head-to-head tests by massive margins, with a 377.9% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and a 278.3% lead in Geekbench Vulkan. Despite this, the RX 560 XT holds a nearly identical percentile rank (79 vs. 80), meaning both cards sit at the same performance tier relative to all other GPUs—a statistical quirk driven by the Quadro’s professional workload focus versus the Radeon’s gaming-oriented design.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split: the Quadro GV100 is for compute-heavy professional work, while the RX 560 XT serves mainstream gaming. The GV100’s 5120 shading units, 640 tensor cores, and 32 GB of HBM2 memory with 868.4 GB/s bandwidth make it an absolute monster for FP32 and FP16 workloads, delivering 16.66 TFLOPS and 33.32 TFLOPS respectively. The RX 560 XT, with 1792 shading units and 4 GB of GDDR5, outputs 4.394 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16—a fraction of the GV100’s throughput.

For buyers, the choice hinges on workload. The Quadro GV100’s 80th percentile ranking and 35520 average benchmark score place it among the top 20% of all GPUs, with nearest rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (0.2% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro Duo (-0.9% delta) confirming its high-end status. The RX 560 XT’s 34133 average score and 79th percentile put it just below the GV100 in aggregate, but its nearest rivals—NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB (-0.1% delta) and AMD Radeon RX 480 (0.4% delta)—show it competes with mid-range workstation and gaming cards, not flagship compute silicon.

Pick the Quadro GV100 if you need massive memory capacity, tensor core acceleration, and professional-grade compute performance. Pick the RX 560 XT if you want a capable entry-level card with a lower power draw (150 W vs. 250 W) and a single 6-pin connector, provided your workloads fit within its 4 GB frame buffer.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is fundamental. The GV100 uses NVIDIA’s Volta architecture on a 12 nm TSMC process, packing 21,100 million transistors into an 815 mm² die—a transistor density of 25.9M per mm². The RX 560 XT uses AMD’s GCN 4.0 architecture on a 14 nm GlobalFoundries process, with 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die (24.6M per mm²). The GV100’s die is over 3.5 times larger and contains nearly 4 times as many transistors.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The GV100 features 32 GB of HBM2 on a 4096-bit bus, yielding 868.4 GB/s bandwidth—3.9 times the RX 560 XT’s 224.0 GB/s from 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus. The GV100 also integrates 640 tensor cores, which the RX 560 XT lacks entirely. This makes the GV100 uniquely suited for AI and deep learning inference, where tensor cores accelerate matrix operations.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The GV100 runs at 1132 MHz base and 1627 MHz boost, while the RX 560 XT runs at 1074 MHz base and 1226 MHz boost. The GV100’s higher clocks, combined with its 320 texture units and 128 ROPs (vs. 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs), produce pixel rates of 208.3 GPixel/s and texture rates of 520.6 GTexel/s—compared to 39.23 GPixel/s and 137.3 GTexel/s for the RX 560 XT.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.6, but the GV100 supports Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12_1, while the RX 560 XT supports Vulkan 1.3 and DirectX 12_0. The GV100 also offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RX 560 XT offers one HDMI 2.0b and three DisplayPort 1.4a.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Quadro GV100 decisively outclasses the RX 560 XT in compute. Its FP32 throughput of 16.66 TFLOPS is 3.8 times the RX 560 XT’s 4.394 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance of 33.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) is 7.6 times higher than the RX 560 XT’s 4.394 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: How do the two cards compare in memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GV100 has 32 GB of HBM2 memory with a 4096-bit bus and 868.4 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 560 XT has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GV100 provides 8 times the capacity and 3.9 times the bandwidth.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The RX 560 XT has a 150 W TDP and requires a 450 W power supply, while the GV100 has a 250 W TDP and requires a 600 W power supply. The RX 560 XT draws 40% less power and uses a single 6-pin connector versus the GV100’s single 8-pin.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The GV100 is longer at 267 mm (10.5 inches) with a height of 111 mm (4.4 inches). The RX 560 XT is shorter at 241 mm (9.5 inches) with no listed height. Both are dual-slot cards.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.6, but the GV100 supports Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12_1, while the RX 560 XT supports Vulkan 1.3 and DirectX 12_0.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The GV100 averages 35520 across all benchmarks, while the RX 560 XT averages 34133. The GV100’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, scores 35435 (0.2% delta), while the RX 560 XT’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB, scores 34154 (-0.1% delta).

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | AMD Radeon RX 560 XT |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GV100 | Ellesmere |

| Architecture | Volta | GCN 4.0 |

| Process Node | 12 nm (TSMC) | 14 nm (GlobalFoundries) |

| Transistors | 21,100 million | 5,700 million |

| Die Size | 815 mm² | 232 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 25.9M / mm² | 24.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1132 MHz | 1074 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1627 MHz | 1226 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 848 MHz (1696 Mbps effective) | 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 32 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | 4096 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 868.4 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 5120 | 1792 |

| TMUs | 320 | 112 |

| ROPs | 128 | 32 |

| Tensor Cores | 640 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 39.23 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 520.6 GTexel/s | 137.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 16.66 TFLOPS | 4.394 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 33.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.394 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 250 W | 150 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 450 W |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm (9.5 inches) |

| Height | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | Not listed |

| Release Date | 2018-03-26 | 2019-03-12 |

| Predecessor | Quadro Pascal | Arctic Islands |

| Successor | Quadro Turing | Vega |

| Launch MSRP | 8,999 USD | Not listed |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two shared benchmark results tell a story of overwhelming dominance. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Quadro GV100 scores 150004 against the RX 560 XT’s 31387—a 377.9% advantage. This means the GV100 delivers nearly 4.8 times the OpenCL compute performance. The gap reflects the fundamental differences in shading units (5120 vs. 1792), memory bandwidth (868.4 GB/s vs. 224.0 GB/s), and FP32 throughput (16.66 TFLOPS vs. 4.394 TFLOPS).

In Geekbench Vulkan, the GV100 scores 139526 versus the RX 560 XT’s 36879, a 278.3% lead. The GV100’s Vulkan 1.4 support, versus the RX 560 XT’s Vulkan 1.3, contributes to this advantage, as does the massive memory bandwidth that allows the GV100 to feed its 5120 shading units more effectively.

The RX 560 XT has no wins in head-to-head comparisons. Its only advantage lies in power efficiency: 150 W TDP versus 250 W, and a 450 W suggested PSU versus 600 W. This makes it suitable for smaller form factor builds, but the performance gap is so vast that the GV100’s advantages in compute, memory, and feature set completely overshadow the Radeon’s lower power draw.

Aggregate scores reinforce the hierarchy. The GV100’s 35520 average benchmark score sits 4.1% above the RX 560 XT’s 34133. The GV100’s individual benchmark results show particular strength in Passmark G3D (19650) and Passmark GPU Compute (9069), while its Geekbench scores (150004 OpenCL, 139526 Vulkan) dwarf the RX 560 XT’s 31387 and 36879 respectively. The RX 560 XT lacks Passmark results entirely, having only Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests—a further indication of its consumer focus versus the GV100’s professional validation suite.