AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a remarkably one-sided picture. In the two common tests recorded for both GPUs, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT by margins that are almost difficult to contextualize. The Geekbench OpenCL result shows the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scoring 143,870 against the RX 560 XT's 31,387 — a 358.4% advantage. That is not a marginal improvement; it represents a generational chasm in compute throughput.

The Vulkan test tells a similar story, though with a slightly narrower gap. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts 139,213 versus the RX 560 XT's 36,879, yielding a 277.5% delta. This suggests that even in an API where the older GCN architecture might theoretically have some legacy optimization advantages, the raw hardware disparity overwhelms any software considerations. The newer Blackwell architecture simply executes more work per clock, per core, and per watt.

Looking at the aggregate benchmark averages, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile reaches 35,435 across all its tested workloads, while the RX 560 XT averages 34,133. Interestingly, despite the massive head-to-head deltas, their overall average scores are only about 3.8% apart. This discrepancy arises because the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's average includes several Passmark tests where it scores relatively low (for instance, 102 in DirectX 12 and 151 in DirectX 10), which drags its mean down substantially. The RX 560 XT, by contrast, only has the two Geekbench scores recorded, so its average reflects only its stronger relative performance in those specific workloads.

The percentile rankings underscore how close these two sit in the broader GPU landscape. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile lands in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 560 XT sits just one point behind at the 79th percentile. This proximity in overall standing, despite the enormous head-to-head score differences, suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's raw compute advantages in OpenCL and Vulkan do not translate uniformly across every benchmark type — particularly the older DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 tests where its Passmark scores are surprisingly modest.

# Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is vast and explains nearly everything about their performance divergence. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process node, while the RX 560 XT relies on the Ellesmere die fabricated by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process. That is a full two generations of process technology apart, and the transistor counts reflect this: the NVIDIA chip packs 31,100 million transistors onto a 263 mm² die, achieving a density of 118.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The AMD chip, by contrast, holds just 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die — a density of only 24.6 million per square millimeter.

The Blackwell 2.0 architecture in the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a fundamentally different design philosophy from GCN 4.0. The NVIDIA GPU features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It also brings dedicated hardware that the RX 560 XT simply lacks: 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The AMD GPU has no ray tracing acceleration and no tensor core equivalent, meaning any workload involving RT effects or AI-accelerated features will run entirely on the RX 560 XT's general-purpose shaders, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile can offload those tasks to specialized silicon.

Memory configurations diverge sharply as well. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 560 XT offers 4 GB of GDDR5 on a wider 256-bit bus, but its bandwidth tops out at 224.0 GB/s — less than one-third of the NVIDIA solution. The clock speeds tell a curious story: the RX 560 XT actually runs at higher base and boost clocks (1,074 MHz and 1,226 MHz respectively) compared to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (847 MHz base, 1,447 MHz boost). Yet the NVIDIA GPU's massive core count and architectural efficiency render those clock advantages irrelevant in practice.

The compute throughput figures crystallize the difference: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 17.04 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the RX 560 XT manages only 4.394 TFLOPS. Even the pixel and texture rates show the gap — 115.8 GPixel/s versus 39.23 GPixel/s, and 266.2 GTexel/s versus 137.3 GTexel/s. The power envelope is equally lopsided: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile carries a 60 W TDP and requires no power connectors, while the RX 560 XT draws 150 W and needs a 6-pin connector with a 450 W suggested PSU.

# FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in OpenCL compute workloads?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is decisively ahead, scoring 143,870 versus the RX 560 XT's 31,387 in Geekbench OpenCL — a 358.4% advantage.

Q: Does the RX 560 XT have any ray tracing capability?

A: No. The AMD GPU has no ray tracing cores listed in its specifications, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 dedicated RT cores.

Q: How do their memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile provides 672.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus. The RX 560 XT offers 224.0 GB/s from 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus — a 3x bandwidth disadvantage.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The data shows the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP with no power connectors required, while the RX 560 XT has a 150 W TDP and needs a 6-pin connector with a 450 W suggested PSU.

Q: What DirectX versions do they support?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the RX 560 XT supports DirectX 12 (12_0). The NVIDIA GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4 versus Vulkan 1.3 on the AMD card.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35,435 across all its tests, while the RX 560 XT averages 34,133. Despite the huge head-to-head deltas, their overall averages are only about 3.8% apart.

# The Verdict

The data leaves little room for ambiguity. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is overwhelmingly faster in every head-to-head benchmark recorded, with margins of 358.4% in OpenCL and 277.5% in Vulkan. It also carries architectural advantages that are not directly benchmarked here but are evident from the specifications: dedicated ray tracing cores, tensor cores, far more memory, and dramatically higher bandwidth.

However, the percentile rankings complicate a simple "buy this instead" narrative. Both GPUs sit in the 79-80th percentile of all GPUs, and their average benchmark scores are within 3.8% of each other. This suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's strengths are concentrated in specific modern workloads, while its Passmark scores — particularly the 102 in DirectX 12 and 151 in DirectX 10 — indicate that it does not universally outperform older or differently-optimized applications.

The RX 560 XT, despite being end-of-life and built on a 14 nm process from 2019, remains competitive in the aggregate precisely because its two recorded benchmarks are relatively strong for its era. But those benchmarks are both Geekbench tests; the absence of Passmark data for the AMD card means we cannot see how it handles DirectX 9, 10, 11, or 12 workloads specifically. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's Passmark scores, while low, are at least documented.

For anyone choosing between these two today, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear performance winner in compute and modern graphics APIs. The RX 560 XT's only advantages are its lower TDP relative to its age (though it still draws 150 W versus 60 W) and its wider 256-bit memory bus — though that bus width does not compensate for the vastly lower bandwidth. The production status also matters: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is active and current, while the RX 560 XT is end-of-life.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 560 XT |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm (TSMC) | 14 nm (GlobalFoundries) |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | 5,700 million |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | 232 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | 24.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 847 MHz | 1074 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1447 MHz | 1226 MHz |

| Memory Size | 12 GB GDDR7 | 4 GB GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | 192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 5888 | 1792 |

| TMUs | 184 | 112 |

| ROPs | 80 | 32 |

| RT Cores | 46 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 184 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 115.8 GPixel/s | 39.23 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 137.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.04 TFLOPS | 4.394 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 60 W | 150 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-02-28 | 2019-03-12 |

| Predecessor | GeForce 40 Mobile | Arctic Islands |

| Successor | None | Vega |

# Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every directly measured benchmark, but its advantages are most pronounced in compute-heavy and modern-API workloads. The 358.4% OpenCL lead indicates exceptional general-purpose compute performance, likely driven by the combination of 5,888 shading units, tensor cores for AI-accelerated tasks, and 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Vulkan advantage of 277.5% similarly shows strong modern graphics API performance. For workloads that leverage ray tracing — which the RX 560 XT cannot accelerate at all — the 46 RT cores provide an insurmountable advantage. The 12 GB memory capacity also makes the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile viable for larger textures and datasets that would exceed the RX 560 XT's 4 GB frame buffer.

The RX 560 XT's wins are more subtle and speculative given the available data. Its higher base clock (1,074 MHz versus 847 MHz) suggests it may have an edge in lightly-threaded or latency-sensitive tasks where clock speed matters more than core count, though no benchmark in the pack directly confirms this. Its 256-bit memory bus is wider than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 192-bit bus, though the actual bandwidth is far lower. The RX 560 XT's 150 W TDP, while higher, means it is a discrete dual-slot card with its own cooling and power delivery, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP solution dependent on the host device's thermal and power infrastructure. For systems with limited power budgets, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 60 W TDP is a clear advantage; for systems expecting a traditional discrete GPU form factor, the RX 560 XT's dual-slot design with standard display outputs may be more straightforward to integrate.

In terms of aggregate standing, both GPUs sit near the 80th percentile of all GPUs, indicating that neither is a slouch in the broader landscape. But the direction of the data is unambiguous: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the superior performer by every measured metric, and its architectural features — ray tracing, tensor cores, GDDR7 memory, and a 5 nm process — point to a fundamentally more capable and future-proof part. The RX 560 XT remains a serviceable legacy GPU, but it cannot match the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in any recorded head-to-head test, and its end-of-life status means no further driver optimizations are likely to close that gap.