AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and AMD Radeon RX 560 XT represent two very different approaches to graphics hardware, separated by process technology, architecture, and intended use case. Benchmark data shows the MX570 holds a clear performance edge in the single available head-to-head test, but the RX 560 XT counters with double the memory and a much wider memory bus. The MX570 wins the only direct benchmark comparison, but the RX 560 XT is the more versatile card for memory-hungry workloads. Choose the MX570 for its superior compute performance per watt and modern feature set; choose the RX 560 XT if you need more VRAM and are willing to accept a larger physical footprint and higher power draw.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear, if narrow, winner in raw compute: the NVIDIA GeForce MX570. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the MX570 scores 38,299 against the RX 560 XT's 31,387, a 22% advantage. This is not a marginal difference; it places the MX570 in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 560 XT sits at the 79th percentile. The MX570's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, which scores 38,349 (just 0.1% higher), while the RX 560 XT's closest competitor is the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB, which scores 34,154 (0.1% lower). The MX570 effectively trades blows with mobile RTX-class hardware, whereas the RX 560 XT aligns with older desktop workstation cards.

However, the verdict is not one-sided. The RX 560 XT offers 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 has only 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s. For workloads that exceed 2 GB of VRAM, the MX570 will hit a hard wall regardless of its compute lead. The RX 560 XT also has a higher pixel rate (39.23 GPixel/s vs. 36.96 GPixel/s) and a dramatically higher texture rate (137.3 GTexel/s vs. 73.92 GTexel/s), suggesting it handles fill-rate-bound tasks better.

The target user for the MX570 is someone who prioritizes compute efficiency and modern API support in a compact, low-power package. Its 15 W TDP and IGP slot width make it suitable for thin-and-light systems. The RX 560 XT, with its 150 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 1x 6-pin power connector, is a traditional desktop card that demands a 450 W power supply. The verdict: pick the MX570 for raw OpenCL performance and efficiency; pick the RX 560 XT for memory capacity, bandwidth, and texture throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 wins decisively, scoring 38,299 compared to the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT's 31,387, a 22% delta in favor of the MX570.

Q: How much memory does each card have, and does it matter?

A: The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6, while the RX 560 XT has 4 GB of GDDR5. The RX 560 XT's larger capacity and 256-bit bus (224.0 GB/s bandwidth) versus the MX570's 64-bit bus (96.00 GB/s) means the AMD card can handle larger textures and datasets without swapping.

Q: What are the architectural differences?

A: The MX570 uses NVIDIA's Ampere architecture on an 8 nm Samsung process with 8,700 million transistors. The RX 560 XT uses AMD's GCN 4.0 architecture on a 14 nm GlobalFoundries process with 5,700 million transistors. The MX570 includes 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores; the RX 560 XT has none.

Q: Which card has better API support?

A: The MX570 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the RX 560 XT supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What are the physical and power requirements?

A: The MX570 is an IGP with no power connectors and a 15 W TDP. The RX 560 XT is a dual-slot card, 241 mm long, requiring a 1x 6-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, with a 150 W TDP.

Q: How do their benchmark percentiles compare?

A: The MX570 is in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 560 XT is in the 79th. Despite the 22% OpenCL gap, both cards sit in a similar overall performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental split between these two GPUs lies in their architectural generations and process nodes. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 is built on the Ampere architecture, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It packs 8,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The AMD Radeon RX 560 XT uses the older GCN 4.0 architecture, produced by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm node. It houses 5,700 million transistors on a larger 232 mm² die, with a lower density of 24.6 million per mm². This process advantage allows the MX570 to deliver more compute per transistor and per square millimeter.

The MX570's Ampere architecture brings hardware features that the GCN 4.0 RX 560 XT simply lacks. The NVIDIA card includes 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The RX 560 XT has no RT cores and no tensor cores, relying entirely on traditional shader processing. This is reflected in the API support: the MX570 is rated for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the RX 560 XT stops at DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. The MX570's newer feature set makes it more future-proof for games and applications that leverage these modern APIs.

The shader configurations also differ. The MX570 has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The RX 560 XT has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The AMD card has fewer shaders but more than double the texture units, which explains its higher texture rate. The MX570 compensates with higher FP32 throughput (4.731 TFLOPS vs. 4.394 TFLOPS) and a 1:1 FP16 ratio, matching its FP32 performance. Both cards have identical FP16 and FP32 rates, indicating no dedicated half-precision acceleration.

Specification Differences

The specifications diverge sharply across nearly every category. The MX570 clocks lower, with a base of 832 MHz and boost of 1155 MHz, versus the RX 560 XT's 1074 MHz base and 1226 MHz boost. However, the MX570's memory runs at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) on GDDR6, while the RX 560 XT uses 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective) on GDDR5. The effective bandwidth tells the real story: the RX 560 XT's 256-bit bus yields 224.0 GB/s, more than double the MX570's 96.00 GB/s from a 64-bit bus.

Memory capacity is a major differentiator: 2 GB on the MX570 versus 4 GB on the RX 560 XT. This is the single most impactful spec for modern workloads. The RX 560 XT also leads in pixel rate (39.23 GPixel/s vs. 36.96 GPixel/s) and texture rate (137.3 GTexel/s vs. 73.92 GTexel/s). The MX570 leads in FP32 compute (4.731 TFLOPS vs. 4.394 TFLOPS) and has the RT/tensor cores that the AMD card lacks.

Power and physical form factor are polar opposites. The MX570 is a 15 W IGP with no power connectors, while the RX 560 XT is a 150 W dual-slot card requiring a 1x 6-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The MX570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface; the RX 560 XT uses PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the MX570 is "Portable Device Dependent," while the RX 560 XT offers 1x HDMI 2.0b and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 560 XT measures 241 mm (9.5 inches) in length. Both are end-of-life products, with the MX570 released in December 2021 and the RX 560 XT in March 2019.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is Geekbench OpenCL, and it is a decisive win for the NVIDIA GeForce MX570. The MX570 scores 38,299, while the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT manages 31,387. That is a 22% delta in favor of the MX570. To put this in context, the MX570's nearest rival is the GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile at 38,349 (a negligible 0.1% difference), while the RTX 4080 Mobile sits just below at 38,135 (0.4% lower). The MX570 is effectively performing at the level of high-end mobile RTX cards, despite its modest 15 W TDP.

The RX 560 XT's score of 31,387 places it in a different league. Its closest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB (34,154, just 0.1% higher) and the RTX A1000 (34,207, 0.2% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 480 comes in at 33,997 (0.4% higher than the RX 560 XT), and the AMD Radeon HD 7950 at 33,951 (0.5% higher). The RX 560 XT is thus bracketed by older workstation and desktop cards, not by modern mobile silicon. The MX570's 22% lead over the RX 560 XT is larger than the gap between the RX 560 XT and any of its own nearest rivals, which are all within 0.5% of its score.

However, the benchmark data does not capture everything. The RX 560 XT's advantages in memory bandwidth and capacity are not reflected in this single OpenCL test. The texture rate differential is stark: 137.3 GTexel/s for the AMD card versus 73.92 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA card. In real-world scenarios that stress texture fetching or exceed 2 GB of VRAM, the RX 560 XT would likely close the gap, even if compute-heavy OpenCL workloads favor the MX570. The MX570 wins the head-to-head on paper, but the RX 560 XT's specifications suggest it is the better choice for specific memory-bound tasks. With one win for the MX570 and zero for the RX 560 XT, the raw benchmark scorecard is one-sided, but the specification sheet tells a more nuanced story.