AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

CORE STATE Navi 14
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1845 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2019
VS
AMD
RADEON

Radeon RX 9070 XT

CORE STATE Navi 48
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2970 MHz
TDP 304 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,032
7,260
geekbench_metal
54,842
N/A
geekbench_opencl
46,965
17,428
geekbench_vulkan
44,191
65,879
passmark_directx_10
46
154
passmark_directx_11
56
292
passmark_directx_12
40
78
passmark_directx_9
133
353
passmark_g2d
774
1,328
passmark_g3d
9,083
26,795
passmark_gpu_compute
4,446
15,864

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

The AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT represent two vastly different eras of AMD graphics, separated by a generational gap in architecture and purpose. The data presents a fascinating split: the newer RX 9070 XT dominates nearly every modern benchmark, yet the older RX 5500 XT posts a stunning victory in one specific compute test that flips the overall average score narrative. This analysis will dissect the head-to-head results, architectural shifts, and the implications for each card's respective use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a decisive generational shift, with the RX 9070 XT winning 9 out of 10 head-to-head tests. The most dramatic victory comes in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, a modern, demanding workload. Here, the RX 9070 XT scores 7260 versus the RX 5500 XT's 1032, a staggering 85.8% lead. This isn't just an incremental improvement; it's an order-of-magnitude jump in raw modern rendering capability.

The pattern continues across the Passmark suite. In Passmark DirectX 11, the RX 9070 XT scores 292 against the RX 5500 XT's 56, an 80.8% advantage. The DirectX 10 test shows a similar story with scores of 154 versus 46, a 70.1% lead. Even in the older DirectX 9 API, the newer card is 62.3% ahead (353 vs 133). The Passmark G3D score, a general indicator of 3D graphics performance, sees the RX 9070 XT at 26795 versus 9083, a 66.1% gap. Compute performance also heavily favors the newer card, with the RX 9070 XT scoring 15864 in Passmark GPU Compute versus 4446 for the RX 5500 XT, a 72% difference.

However, the single most intriguing result is the Geekbench OpenCL score. Here, the RX 5500 XT decisively wins with a score of 46965, compared to the RX 9070 XT's 17428. This represents a 169.5% lead for the older card. This is a massive outlier. While the RX 9070 XT still wins in Geekbench Vulkan (65879 vs 44191, a 32.9% lead), the OpenCL result indicates a fundamental difference in how these two architectures handle this specific compute workload. It suggests that the RX 5500 XT's drivers or hardware are far more optimized for this legacy OpenCL path. This single win for the RX 5500 XT is so significant that it skews the average benchmark scores, giving the RX 5500 XT a higher average (14692) than the RX 9070 XT (13543), despite the latter's overwhelming victory in all other tests.

Architecture Differences

The performance disparity is rooted in a complete architectural overhaul. The RX 5500 XT is built on the RDNA 1.0 architecture, using the Navi 14 chip fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. In contrast, the RX 9070 XT uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip on a more advanced 4 nm process. This process shrink allows for a massive increase in transistor count: the RX 9070 XT has 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, while the RX 5500 XT has only 6,400 million on a 158 mm² die. This results in a transistor density of 151.0M / mm² for the newer card versus 40.5M / mm² for the older one.

Core configurations reflect this massive difference. The RX 9070 XT features 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The RX 5500 XT, by comparison, has 1408 shading units, 88 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The RX 9070 XT also introduces 64 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the RX 5500 XT. Pixel and texture rates scale accordingly: the RX 9070 XT achieves 380.2 GPixel/s and 760.3 GTexel/s, versus 59.04 GPixel/s and 162.4 GTexel/s for the RX 5500 XT. Floating-point performance is also dramatically higher on the newer card, with 48.66 TFLOPS (FP32) versus 5.196 TFLOPS. Interestingly, the FP16 performance differs in nature: the RX 5500 XT runs at 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the RX 9070 XT runs at 48.66 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating a shift in compute focus.

Memory is another major differentiator. The RX 9070 XT comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 5500 XT has only 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s. This 16 GB capacity is crucial for modern high-resolution textures and workloads. The RX 9070 XT also supports newer standards like PCIe 5.0 x16, compared to the RX 5500 XT's PCIe 4.0 x8, and offers DisplayPort 2.1a outputs versus DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 9070 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the RX 5500 XT is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both share the same OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 support.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture of generational progress. The RX 9070 XT is the undisputed champion in modern gaming and compute scenarios, with massive leads in DirectX 11, 12, and Vulkan benchmarks. Its 85.8% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad and 66.1% lead in Passmark G3D are definitive. For any user looking at contemporary gaming or professional 3D workloads, the RX 9070 XT is the only choice based on performance. Its 16 GB memory and ray tracing cores also future-proof it for upcoming titles.

The RX 5500 XT's sole benchmark victory is a curiosity, not a recommendation. Its 169.5% lead in Geekbench OpenCL is a specific software/hardware optimization quirk. While this makes it appear "better" in that one test, it does not translate to a broader performance advantage. The card is an end-of-life product from 2019, and its 4 GB memory is a severe limitation for modern games. The data does not support choosing it for any general-purpose task over the RX 9070 XT. The RX 9070 XT is the clear winner for anyone needing a high-performance, current-generation graphics solution.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards:

  • Architecture: RDNA 1.0 vs RDNA 4.0
  • Process Node: 7 nm vs 4 nm
  • Transistors: 6,400 million vs 53,900 million
  • Die Size: 158 mm² vs 357 mm²
  • Base Clock: 1607 MHz vs 1660 MHz
  • Boost Clock: 1845 MHz vs 2970 MHz
  • Memory Size: 4 GB vs 16 GB
  • Memory Bus Width: 128 bit vs 256 bit
  • Memory Bandwidth: 224.0 GB/s vs 644.6 GB/s
  • Shading Units: 1408 vs 4096
  • TMUs: 88 vs 256
  • ROPs: 32 vs 128
  • Ray Tracing Cores: None vs 64
  • Pixel Rate: 59.04 GPixel/s vs 380.2 GPixel/s
  • Texture Rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 760.3 GTexel/s
  • FP32 Performance: 5.196 TFLOPS vs 48.66 TFLOPS
  • FP16 Performance: 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) vs 48.66 TFLOPS (1:1)
  • TDP: 130 W vs 304 W
  • Power Connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin
  • Suggested PSU: 300 W vs 700 W
  • Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 vs PCIe 5.0 x16
  • Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a vs 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
  • DirectX Support: 12 (12_1) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2)
  • Release Date: 2019-12-11 vs 2025-03-05
  • Production Status: End-of-life vs Active
  • Launch MSRP: 169 USD vs 599 USD

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT faster than the RX 5500 XT in all benchmarks?

A: No. The RX 9070 XT wins 9 out of 10 tests, but the RX 5500 XT wins the Geekbench OpenCL test by a margin of 169.5%.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two cards?

A: The largest delta is in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the RX 9070 XT leads by 85.8%.

Q: Does the RX 5500 XT have ray tracing capabilities?

A: No, the RX 5500 XT has no dedicated ray tracing cores, while the RX 9070 XT is equipped with 64.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 9070 XT has significantly more, with 644.6 GB/s compared to the RX 5500 XT's 224.0 GB/s.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: Despite the RX 9070 XT's dominance, the RX 5500 XT has a higher average benchmark score of 14692, versus 13543 for the RX 9070 XT, due to its outlier OpenCL result.

Q: Which card is based on a more recent architecture?

A: The RX 9070 XT uses the newer RDNA 4.0 architecture, while the RX 5500 XT is based on RDNA 1.0.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9070 XT is the clear winner for all modern 3D rendering and gaming applications. It dominates in DirectX 11, 12, and Vulkan benchmarks. Its victory in the Passmark G2D test (1328 vs 774) also suggests better 2D desktop and video processing performance. The presence of ray tracing cores and 16 GB of VRAM further solidifies its position for contemporary AAA games at high resolutions. Its active production status and PCIe 5.0 interface imply it is intended for current and future systems.

The RX 5500 XT's only claim to victory is in the Geekbench OpenCL test. This indicates a specific, likely legacy, compute workload where it is exceptionally well-optimized. However, this is a narrow niche. For users running software that relies on this particular OpenCL path, the RX 5500 XT would be the better performer. Outside of that specific scenario, the RX 9070 XT's capabilities are overwhelming. The RX 5500 XT could also be considered for legacy systems due to its lower power draw (130 W TDP) and a single 8-pin connector, but the performance data does not recommend it for any modern, demanding task.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 5500 XT
RX 9070 XT
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,408
4,096 +190.9%
Shaders
1,408
4,096 +190.9%
TMUs
88
256 +190.9%
ROPs
32
128 +300.0%
Compute Units
22
64 +190.9%
Clocks
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1660 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
2970 MHz
Game Clock
1717 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
644.6 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
—
64 MB
L0 Cache
—
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
380.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
760.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.196 TFLOPS
48.66 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
324.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
1.521 TFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
10.39 TFLOPS (2:1)
48.66 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
64
Matrix Cores
—
128
Power
TDP
130 W
304 W
TDP (W)
130
304 +133.8%
Suggested PSU
300 W
700 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
RDNA 4.0
GPU Name
Navi 14
Navi 48
Generation
Navi (RX 5000)
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Process Size
7 nm
4 nm
Transistors
6,400 million
53,900 million
Die Size
158 mm²
357 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
40.5M / mm²
151.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
2.2
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
180 mm 7.1 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
169 USD
599 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Vega
Navi III
Successor
Navi II
—
View Radeon RX 5500 XT Details View Radeon RX 9070 XT Details