AMD Radeon R7 M465 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single head-to-head benchmark between these two parts: Geekbench OpenCL. In that test, the Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 6554, while the AMD Radeon R7 M465 scores 5841. The delta of 12.2% places the Intel part clearly ahead, and it wins the only direct comparison in the database.

Context from the nearest rival lists reinforces the gap. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 sits at the 38th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 6554. Its closest rivals are tightly clustered around that figure: the AMD Radeon HD 7730M is only 0.4% behind, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M trails by 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon R7 M460 is 0.9% ahead. The AMD Radeon R7 M465, by contrast, lands at the 33rd percentile with an average score of 5841. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R5 M435 (0.3% behind), the Intel UHD Graphics 730 (1.5% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti (1.9% ahead). The difference in percentile rank, 38 versus 33, corresponds to the measured 12.2% performance advantage for the Intel part in OpenCL compute workloads.

The Intel part’s lead is not marginal. A 12.2% delta in Geekbench OpenCL is substantial enough to place the two GPUs in different competitive tiers, even though both are entry-level or integrated solutions. The Intel UHD Graphics P750’s score of 6554 is also higher than every rival listed for the AMD Radeon R7 M465, including the Intel UHD Graphics 730 at 5929. Conversely, the AMD Radeon R7 M465’s score of 5841 is lower than every rival listed for the Intel part, including the weakest one, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M at 6493. That means the Intel part outperforms not only the AMD part in question but also the entirety of the AMD part’s immediate competitive set.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is built on Rocket Lake silicon, using Intel’s Generation 12.1 architecture, and fabricated on a 14 nm+++ process at Intel’s own foundry. The AMD Radeon R7 M465 uses the Topaz chip, based on GCN 3.0, and is fabricated on a 28 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference, 14 nm+++ versus 28 nm, is a full generation apart in manufacturing technology, which helps explain the Intel part’s higher clock behavior despite its lower discrete-component complexity.

The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a Ring Bus interface, while the AMD part is a discrete mobile GPU using PCIe 3.0 x8. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has 256 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. The AMD Radeon R7 M465 has 384 shading units, 24 TMUs, and only 8 ROPs. The AMD part carries a higher raw shader count, but its lower TMU and ROP counts limit its fillrate output. The recorded pixel rate for the Intel part is 41.60 GPixel/s, while the AMD part manages 8.192 GPixel/s. Texture rate follows a similar pattern: 83.20 GTexel/s for Intel versus 24.58 GTexel/s for AMD. These fillrate figures are decisive in rasterization-bound workloads, even though the AMD part’s FP32 throughput of 786.4 GFLOPS slightly exceeds the Intel part’s 665.6 GFLOPS.

Memory architecture differs completely. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses system shared memory, with its bandwidth described as system dependent. The AMD Radeon R7 M465 has 2 GB of dedicated GDDR5 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 36.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is listed at 1125 MHz, with 4.5 Gbps effective data rate. The AMD part’s dedicated memory avoids contention with the CPU, but its narrow 64-bit bus limits total bandwidth, and the system-dependent nature of the Intel part’s shared memory makes its effective bandwidth highly variable depending on the host platform.

Clock speeds also differ markedly. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has a base clock of 350 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The AMD Radeon R7 M465 has a base clock of 730 MHz and a boost clock of 1024 MHz. The AMD part starts at more than double the Intel base clock, but the Intel part’s boost clock is substantially higher, and its 14 nm+++ process allows it to sustain higher frequencies under load.

Feature support shows a few distinctions. Both parts support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4, while the AMD part supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.2.170. The Intel part’s higher feature level for DirectX and newer Vulkan version reflect its more recent architecture generation. The AMD part has a listed transistor count of 1,550 million on a 125 mm² die, with a transistor density of 12.4M per mm², while the Intel part has no transistor or die size data recorded. The AMD part’s production status is end-of-life, with a release date of May 14, 2016, and it lists Solar System as its predecessor and Polaris Mobile as its successor. The Intel part is also end-of-life, with no release date recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 6554, which is 12.2% higher than the AMD Radeon R7 M465’s score of 5841.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in pixel fillrate?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has a pixel rate of 41.60 GPixel/s, while the AMD Radeon R7 M465 has a pixel rate of 8.192 GPixel/s. The Intel part is over five times faster in this metric.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon R7 M465 have more shading units?

A: Yes. The AMD Radeon R7 M465 has 384 shading units, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 has 256. However, the Intel part has 64 TMUs versus 24, and 32 ROPs versus 8.

Q: What memory does each GPU use?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The AMD Radeon R7 M465 uses 2 GB of GDDR5 on a 64-bit bus with 36.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 has a boost clock of 1300 MHz, compared to 1024 MHz for the AMD Radeon R7 M465. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 730 MHz versus 350 MHz.

Q: What are the DirectX and Vulkan support levels?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD Radeon R7 M465 supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.2.170.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two parts in the database:

• Manufacturer: Intel versus AMD
• Chip: Rocket Lake versus Topaz
• Architecture: Generation 12.1 versus GCN 3.0
• Process node: 14 nm+++ versus 28 nm
• Foundry: Intel versus TSMC
• Transistors: Not recorded versus 1,550 million
• Die size: Not recorded versus 125 mm²
• Transistor density: Not recorded versus 12.4M / mm²
• Base clock: 350 MHz versus 730 MHz
• Boost clock: 1300 MHz versus 1024 MHz
• Memory clock: System Shared versus 1125 MHz (4.5 Gbps effective)
• Memory size: System Shared versus 2 GB
• Memory type: System Shared versus GDDR5
• Memory bus width: System Shared versus 64 bit
• Memory bandwidth: System Dependent versus 36.00 GB/s
• Shading units: 256 versus 384
• TMUs: 64 versus 24
• ROPs: 32 versus 8
• Pixel rate: 41.60 GPixel/s versus 8.192 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 83.20 GTexel/s versus 24.58 GTexel/s
• FP32: 665.6 GFLOPS versus 786.4 GFLOPS
• FP16: 1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1) versus 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 15 W versus not recorded
• Slot width: IGP versus not recorded
• Bus interface: Ring Bus versus PCIe 3.0 x8
• Display outputs: Motherboard Dependent versus not recorded
• DirectX: 12 (12_1) versus 12 (12_0)
• Vulkan: 1.4 versus 1.2.170
• Release date: Not recorded versus May 14, 2016
• Predecessor: Not recorded versus Solar System
• Successor: Not recorded versus Polaris Mobile
• Geekbench OpenCL score: 6554 versus 5841
• Percentile: 38 versus 33

The Verdict

The recorded data points to the Intel UHD Graphics P750 as the stronger part in raw OpenCL compute, with a 12.2% score advantage over the AMD Radeon R7 M465. The Intel part also dominates in pixel rate (41.60 GPixel/s versus 8.192 GPixel/s) and texture rate (83.20 GTexel/s versus 24.58 GTexel/s), despite having fewer shading units. Its higher boost clock of 1300 MHz, newer 14 nm+++ process, and more recent architecture generation all contribute to this result.

The AMD Radeon R7 M465 does retain advantages in specific areas. It offers dedicated 2 GB GDDR5 memory with 36.00 GB/s bandwidth, which can be more predictable than system shared memory, especially on platforms where the CPU and GPU compete for the same memory pool. It also has a higher FP32 throughput at 786.4 GFLOPS, and more shading units at 384. For workloads that scale with raw shader count or that benefit from dedicated memory, the AMD part may hold an edge.

The benchmark data, however, favors Intel. The 12.2% Geekbench OpenCL delta is the only direct head-to-head measurement available, and it is accompanied by a higher database percentile rank (38 versus 33). Users selecting a GPU for compute-oriented tasks should prefer the Intel UHD Graphics P750 based on the recorded scores. Users who require dedicated memory and a wider shader array may consider the AMD Radeon R7 M465, but they should expect lower fillrate performance and a lower overall benchmark score. The Intel part is the safer pick from the data, with both a higher average score and a stronger competitive position against its nearest rivals.