AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and AMD Radeon RX 7600M target fundamentally different segments, and the benchmark data reflects that split. The Pro WX 8200 is an end-of-life workstation card built on the older GCN 5.0 architecture, launched in August 2018. The RX 7600M is an active mobile GPU from the Radeon RX 7000 series, released in January 2023, using the newer RDNA 3.0 architecture. The data shows a single head-to-head benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, where the Pro WX 8200 wins with a score of 69774 against the RX 7600M’s 63775, a 9.4% advantage.

For professionals running OpenCL-accelerated workloads on a desktop workstation, the Pro WX 8200 is the stronger choice based on raw compute results. It also holds an average benchmark score of 69870, placing it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. The RX 7600M, despite its newer architecture, scores 63775 on the same OpenCL test and sits at the 89th percentile, with an average score of 63775. The mobile part is designed for laptops, with an IGP slot width, no power connectors, and a 90 W TDP, making it suitable for portable systems where the 230 W Pro WX 8200 is physically and electrically impractical.

The verdict is clear: pick the Pro WX 8200 for maximum OpenCL compute performance in a desktop workstation. Pick the RX 7600M for a modern mobile solution with ray tracing support and a much lower power envelope, accepting a measurable performance deficit in compute workloads. The Pro WX 8200 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The RX 7600M has no listed launch MSRP, so pricing cannot be compared from this data.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in the only head-to-head benchmark available?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 wins the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 69774, beating the AMD Radeon RX 7600M’s 63775 by 9.4%.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in overall performance percentiles?

A: The Pro WX 8200 ranks in the 90th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 69870. The RX 7600M ranks in the 89th percentile with an average score of 63775.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the Pro WX 8200 based on average scores?

A: The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 with an average score of 69986 (0.2% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile at 70140 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69000 (1.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE at 70829 (1.4% higher).

Q: What are the closest rivals to the RX 7600M based on average scores?

A: The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP with an average score of 63830 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63842 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 (0.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64212 (0.7% higher).

Q: Does the RX 7600M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7600M has 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), whereas the Pro WX 8200 has no ray tracing cores and only supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient?

A: The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP and requires no power connectors, while the Pro WX 8200 has a 230 W TDP and needs a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector setup, along with a suggested 550 W power supply.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on entirely different architectures, separated by five years of development. The Pro WX 8200 uses the GCN 5.0 architecture with the Vega 10 chip, fabricated on a 14 nm process by GlobalFoundries. The RX 7600M uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. This process shrink is significant: the Pro WX 8200 packs 12,500 million transistors on a 495 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 25.3 million per mm². The RX 7600M packs 13,300 million transistors on a much smaller 204 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm².

The compute layouts differ drastically. The Pro WX 8200 has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Despite having half the shading units and TMUs, the RX 7600M achieves higher raw FP32 throughput at 17.27 TFLOPS versus the Pro WX 8200’s 10.75 TFLOPS, thanks to its higher clocks and more efficient architecture. The RX 7600M also adds 28 ray tracing cores, a feature completely absent from the Pro WX 8200.

Memory architecture is another fundamental split. The Pro WX 8200 uses 8 GB of HBM2 on a 2048-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s. That is a 2x bandwidth advantage for the workstation card, which explains its OpenCL win despite the mobile card’s architectural advantages.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two GPUs, based strictly on the FACT PACK data:

• Process Node: Pro WX 8200 uses 14 nm; RX 7600M uses 6 nm.
• Foundry: Pro WX 8200 uses GlobalFoundries; RX 7600M uses TSMC.
• Transistors: Pro WX 8200 has 12,500 million; RX 7600M has 13,300 million.
• Die Size: Pro WX 8200 is 495 mm²; RX 7600M is 204 mm².
• Base Clock: Pro WX 8200 runs at 1200 MHz; RX 7600M runs at 1500 MHz.
• Boost Clock: Pro WX 8200 boosts to 1500 MHz; RX 7600M boosts to 2410 MHz.
• Game Clock: Pro WX 8200 has none listed; RX 7600M has a 2070 MHz game clock.
• Memory Clock: Pro WX 8200 runs at 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective); RX 7600M runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).
• Memory Type: Pro WX 8200 uses HBM2; RX 7600M uses GDDR6.
• Memory Bus Width: Pro WX 8200 has a 2048-bit bus; RX 7600M has a 128-bit bus.
• Memory Bandwidth: Pro WX 8200 delivers 512.0 GB/s; RX 7600M delivers 256.0 GB/s.
• Shading Units: 3584 vs 1792.
• TMUs: 224 vs 112.
• Ray Tracing Cores: Pro WX 8200 has none; RX 7600M has 28.
• Pixel Rate: Pro WX 8200 is 96.00 GPixel/s; RX 7600M is 154.2 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: Pro WX 8200 is 336.0 GTexel/s; RX 7600M is 269.9 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Performance: Pro WX 8200 is 10.75 TFLOPS; RX 7600M is 17.27 TFLOPS.
• FP16 Performance: Pro WX 8200 is 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1); RX 7600M is 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: Pro WX 8200 is 230 W; RX 7600M is 90 W.
• Slot Width: Pro WX 8200 is dual-slot; RX 7600M is IGP.
• Power Connectors: Pro WX 8200 requires 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin; RX 7600M requires none.
• Suggested PSU: Pro WX 8200 lists 550 W; RX 7600M lists none.
• Bus Interface: Pro WX 8200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16; RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16.
• Display Outputs: Pro WX 8200 has 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a; RX 7600M is portable device dependent.
• DirectX Support: Pro WX 8200 supports 12 (12_1); RX 7600M supports 12 Ultimate (12_2).
• Vulkan Support: Pro WX 8200 supports 1.3; RX 7600M supports 1.4.
• Production Status: Pro WX 8200 is end-of-life; RX 7600M is active.
• Release Date: Pro WX 8200 launched August 2018; RX 7600M launched January 2023.
• Launch MSRP: Pro WX 8200 is 999 USD; RX 7600M has none listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available in the data is the Geekbench OpenCL test. The Pro WX 8200 scores 69774, while the RX 7600M scores 63775. That is a 9.4% delta in favor of the workstation card. This is a decisive win for the Pro WX 8200, but the margin is narrower than the architectural differences might suggest. The RX 7600M’s higher FP32 throughput (17.27 TFLOPS vs 10.75 TFLOPS) and faster pixel rate (154.2 GPixel/s vs 96.00 GPixel/s) do not translate into an OpenCL victory. The Pro WX 8200’s 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, double the RX 7600M’s 256.0 GB/s, likely plays a decisive role in this workload.

Looking at the broader benchmark context, the Pro WX 8200 also has Geekbench Metal and Vulkan scores of 70759 and 69076, respectively, though no comparable RX 7600M results exist for those tests. The Pro WX 8200’s average benchmark score of 69870 places it just 0.2% below the NVIDIA Quadro P6000’s 69986 and 1.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE’s 70829. The RX 7600M’s average score of 63775 sits 0.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56’s 63693 and 0.7% below the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100’s 64212.

The wins are lopsided: the Pro WX 8200 takes 1 head-to-head win, the RX 7600M takes 0. However, the RX 7600M counters with modern features: ray tracing cores, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and Vulkan 1.4. The Pro WX 8200 lacks ray tracing entirely and only reaches DirectX 12_1 and Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7600M also wins on power efficiency by a wide margin, with a 90 W TDP versus 230 W, and requires no external power connectors. For mobile use, that difference is not just a spec sheet footnote; it is the difference between a laptop-ready IGP and a desktop-only dual-slot card. The data shows two capable GPUs, but they are built for different machines and different priorities.