AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Specifications
Radeon Pro WX 8200 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Pro WX 8200 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon Pro WX 8200's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon Pro WX 8200 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon Pro WX 8200's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon Pro WX 8200 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the Pro WX 8200, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
Pro WX 8200 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 5.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on AMD's GCN 5.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Pro WX 8200 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's Radeon Pro WX 8200 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon Pro WX 8200 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon Pro WX 8200 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon Pro WX 8200 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon Pro WX 8200 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Radeon Pro WX 8200 Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms. Higher scores benefit applications that leverage GPU acceleration for non-graphics workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performersgeekbench_vulkanSource
Geekbench Vulkan tests GPU compute using the modern low-overhead Vulkan API. This shows how AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 performs with next-generation graphics and compute workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
About AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a professional workstation GPU built on the Vega 10 chip with GCN 5.0 architecture. It launched with a launch MSRP of 999 USD. Benchmark results place it at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average Geekbench score of 69408 across OpenCL and Vulkan tests. The card is end-of-life, but its specifications and performance data remain relevant for comparison. Fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, the die contains 12,500 million transistors across a 495 mm² area, yielding a density of 25.3M / mm². The base clock is 1200 MHz with a boost clock of 1500 MHz, and memory runs at 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective). Released on August 12, 2018, it succeeded the Radeon Pro GCN and was followed by the Radeon Pro Vega.
Who Should Consider It
The benchmark data indicates that the WX 8200 outperforms 92% of all GPUs in the database, making it a strong candidate for professional workloads that rely on OpenCL and Vulkan acceleration. The average score of 69408 is driven by an OpenCL result of 69774 and a Vulkan result of 69041, showing consistent performance across both APIs. With 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, the card delivers a pixel rate of 96.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 336.0 GTexel/s. These figures suggest it can handle high-resolution rendering and compute tasks efficiently.
The 8 GB HBM2 memory with a 2048-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is particularly beneficial for large datasets and high-resolution textures. For users working with 4K or multi-monitor setups, the memory subsystem offers sufficient headroom, though the 8 GB capacity may be a limiting factor for extremely large scenes. The card's 10.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance places it in a professional tier, while the FP16 rate of 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1) indicates support for half-precision compute. The boost clock of 1500 MHz ensures that the shading units are well-fed, and the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface provides a standard connection for workstation motherboards.
Given its end-of-life status, this GPU is best suited for professionals who already own it or can source it through secondary markets. Its performance relative to modern rivals remains competitive, as shown in the comparison section. The dual-slot design and 230 W TDP require adequate chassis airflow and a 550 W PSU. The card's physical footprint is 267 mm in length (10.5 inches) and 111 mm in height (4.4 inches), which fits most mid-tower and full-tower cases.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The WX 8200 does not include dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, as those fields are null in the specification. This means ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads would rely on general-purpose compute, which is not optimal for those tasks. However, the card supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. DirectX 12_1 includes features like conservative rasterization and rasterizer-ordered views, but not hardware-accelerated ray tracing. Vulkan 1.3 does include ray tracing extensions, but without dedicated hardware, performance would be limited.
For professional applications that use OpenCL or Vulkan for compute, the card's feature set is adequate. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI inference acceleration, but the FP16 performance of 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1) can be used for some half-precision workloads. The display outputs consist of 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting high-resolution monitors. The absence of dedicated RT hardware is a notable gap for modern 3D workflows that increasingly rely on hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the card's raw compute power still handles traditional rasterization and compute tasks effectively.
Memory Subsystem
The memory subsystem is a standout feature. 8 GB of HBM2 is paired with a 2048-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1000 MHz, with an effective data rate of 2 Gbps. This high bandwidth is critical for memory-intensive applications such as 3D rendering, video compositing, and scientific simulations. The 8 GB capacity, while not the largest available, is sufficient for many professional tasks. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the GPU can feed its 3584 shading units efficiently, reducing bottlenecks at high resolutions.
Compared to the nearest rivals, the WX 8200's memory bandwidth is not directly listed, but the overall performance scores suggest it competes well. The 2048-bit bus is wider than typical consumer GPUs, which contributes to the high throughput. For users working with 4K textures or large compute buffers, this memory subsystem provides a solid foundation. The HBM2 technology also offers lower power consumption per bit compared to GDDR, though the TDP of 230 W reflects the overall power draw of the card.
How It Compares
The WX 8200's average benchmark score of 69408 places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals, with performance deltas under 4% in each case.
Intel Arc A770: The Arc A770 averages 68809, which is 0.9% lower than the WX 8200. This indicates near-parity performance, with the WX 8200 holding a slight edge in the tested OpenCL and Vulkan workloads. The difference is minimal, making the two cards interchangeable in many compute scenarios.
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile: The RTX A3000 Mobile scores 70140, which is 1% higher than the WX 8200. This mobile GPU edges out the desktop WX 8200, but the difference is within noise for many applications. The RTX A3000 Mobile's higher score suggests that modern mobile parts have closed the gap with older desktop workstation cards.
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25: The Instinct MI25 averages 68562, putting it 1.2% behind the WX 8200. Both are AMD Vega-based parts, and the WX 8200 shows a small but consistent advantage. The MI25 is a datacenter-oriented card, yet the WX 8200 manages to outperform it in these benchmarks.
NVIDIA Quadro P6000: The Quadro P6000 averages 67320, which is 3.1% lower than the WX 8200. This is the largest gap among the rivals, indicating the WX 8200 outperforms the Quadro P6000 by a noticeable margin in these tests. The Quadro P6000, while a capable workstation card, falls behind the WX 8200 in raw OpenCL and Vulkan performance.
Overall, the WX 8200 sits in the middle of this group, slightly faster than the Arc A770 and Instinct MI25, slightly slower than the RTX A3000 Mobile, and clearly ahead of the Quadro P6000.
FAQ
Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the WX 8200?
A: The TDP is 230 W.
Q: How much memory does the WX 8200 have and what type?
A: It has 8 GB of HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.
Q: Which APIs are supported?
A: It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.
Q: What are the pixel and texture fill rates?
A: The pixel rate is 96.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 336.0 GTexel/s.
Q: What is the production status?
A: The card is end-of-life.
Q: What power connectors are required?
A: It requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector.
Q: What is the FP32 performance?
A: The FP32 performance is 10.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1).
Power and Cooling
The WX 8200 has a TDP of 230 W, requiring a suggested PSU of 550 W. It uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot in design, which means it occupies two expansion slots. Its physical dimensions are 267 mm in length (10.5 inches) and 111 mm in height (4.4 inches). The dual-slot cooler is designed to handle the 230 W thermal load, but adequate case airflow is necessary. The power connector configuration is standard for high-end workstation GPUs, and the 550 W PSU recommendation provides a comfortable margin for the card's peak power draw. The 14 nm process and GCN 5.0 architecture contribute to a balanced power envelope, making the card suitable for professional workstations with standard power supplies.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon Pro WX 8200
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Comparisons
See how the Radeon Pro WX 8200 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Radeon Pro WX 8200 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs