AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects a generational chasm rather than a close contest. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, while the WX 4100’s average benchmark score across ten tests is 6330, a difference that is statistically negligible but masks entirely different performance profiles. The WX 4100’s scores come from legacy DirectX 9/10/11/12 and compute workloads, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s single score represents a modern, demanding DX12 workload, making direct comparison misleading but revealing about each card’s era and purpose.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards, so the comparison relies on their respective benchmark suites and percentile placements. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 posts an average benchmark score of 6330, placing it in the 37th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (avgScore 6327, deltaPct 0.1), NVIDIA Quadro K620 (avgScore 6282, deltaPct 0.8), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M (avgScore 6389, deltaPct -0.9), indicating it trades blows with decade-old midrange and mobile parts. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER averages 6270, sitting in the 36th percentile, with its closest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (avgScore 6270, deltaPct 0) — a dead heat — and the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (deltaPct -0.2) and AMD FirePro W600 (deltaPct 0.8) trailing slightly.

Within the WX 4100’s own benchmark results, its strongest showing is in Geekbench Metal at 21018, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 18703 and Geekbench OpenCL at 17642. These scores are roughly 8-10% apart, suggesting balanced compute performance across different APIs. Its Passmark G3D score of 3699 and GPU compute score of 1475 are far lower in absolute terms, reflecting the card’s focus on workstation tasks rather than gaming rasterization. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 cannot be directly compared to any WX 4100 figure, but the fact that the RTX card’s sole benchmark equals the WX 4100’s average across ten diverse tests underscores the former’s raw power concentration in modern workloads.

The biggest win for the WX 4100 is in API coverage: it supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX card’s newer API versions and feature set give it a clear advantage in forward-looking applications, but the WX 4100’s legacy support ensures compatibility with older professional software. In terms of raw compute, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the WX 4100’s 2.460 TFLOPS — an 17.9x difference — and its texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s versus 76.86 GTexel/s represents a 8.9x gap. These are not close numbers; they are from different hardware generations entirely.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is immense. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses the Baffin chip built on GCN 4.0 architecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER employs the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die. The transistor density tells the story: the WX 4100 has 24.4M transistors per mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER reaches 120.6M per mm² — a 4.9x density improvement that enables far more complex circuitry in a relatively compact package.

Core counts differ by an order of magnitude. The WX 4100 has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER features 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX card also includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, neither of which exist on the WX 4100, which lacks any dedicated AI or RT hardware. Clock speeds reflect their respective process nodes: the WX 4100 runs at 1125 MHz base and 1201 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER boosts to 2452 MHz from a 2295 MHz base — roughly double the frequency. Memory subsystems are equally divergent: the WX 4100 uses 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus delivering 896.0 GB/s, a 9.3x bandwidth advantage.

The WX 4100 is a single-slot, low-power professional card drawing 50 W with no power connectors, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot monster rated at 350 W requiring a 16-pin connector. The bus interface also differs: PCIe 3.0 x8 for the AMD card versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the NVIDIA card, with the latter offering 4x the lanes and multiple generations of bandwidth improvement. Display outputs reflect their intended use: the WX 4100 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a for multi-monitor professional setups, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for consumer and prosumer displays.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, which is 17.9x higher than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100’s 2.460 TFLOPS. Both cards offer 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratios.

Q: How do memory capacities and bandwidth compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus the WX 4100’s 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s. The NVIDIA card provides 4x the capacity and 9.3x the bandwidth.

Q: Are these cards comparable in their benchmark percentiles?

A: The WX 4100 sits in the 37th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 6330, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is in the 36th percentile with an average of 6270. This near-identical percentile placement is coincidental, as the WX 4100’s scores come from older, lighter workloads.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The WX 4100 has a 50 W TDP and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP and requires a single 16-pin connector; no suggested PSU is listed in the data.

Q: Which card supports newer graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the WX 4100 supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 is end-of-life, released in November 2016, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is active, with a release date of December 2025.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every specification field. The WX 4100 uses a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries with 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Clock speeds: the WX 4100 has a 1125 MHz base and 1201 MHz boost, versus the RTX card’s 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory: 4 GB GDDR5 with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth versus 16 GB GDDR7 with 896.0 GB/s. Shading units: 1024 versus 8960. TMUs: 64 versus 280. ROPs: 16 versus 96. The RTX card has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores; the WX 4100 has none. Pixel rate: 19.22 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 76.86 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32: 2.460 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. TDP: 50 W versus 350 W. Slot width: single-slot versus dual-slot. Power connectors: none versus 1x 16-pin. Bus interface: PCIe 3.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Dimensions: 168 mm length, 69 mm height versus 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 48 mm width. Production status: end-of-life versus active. Release date: November 2016 versus December 2025. Launch MSRP: 399 USD versus 749 USD.

The Verdict

The verdict is unambiguous from the data: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the superior GPU by every measurable metric except legacy compatibility and power draw. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 16 GB VRAM make it suitable for modern 3D workloads, AI acceleration via tensor cores, and ray-traced content — capabilities the WX 4100 lacks entirely. The WX 4100’s 2.460 TFLOPS and 4 GB GDDR5 are adequate for basic professional visualization from 2016, but its 37th percentile placement against peers like the GTX 580M shows it was never a high-performance part. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s single benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 — a demanding test — matches the WX 4100’s average across ten easier benchmarks, indicating the NVIDIA card achieves comparable results in far more stressful conditions.

Users should pick the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER if they need current-generation performance, ray tracing, tensor core acceleration, or high-bandwidth GDDR7 memory. The WX 4100 is only relevant for legacy workstation deployments where its 50 W TDP, single-slot form factor, and four mini-DisplayPort outputs are valued, and where software demands DirectX 12_0 rather than 12_2. The WX 4100’s lower launch MSRP of 399 USD versus 749 USD reflects its older, weaker position, but the RTX card’s active production status and newer release date signal long-term support. The data does not support any scenario where the WX 4100 outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in raw capability; the only advantages are physical size, power efficiency, and legacy API compatibility.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 wins in scenarios requiring minimal power draw (50 W TDP), compact single-slot installation (168 mm length), and multi-display professional output via four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. Its 4 GB memory and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth suffice for older CAD or medical imaging applications, and its support for DirectX 12_0, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 covers software from its 2016 era. Its nearest rivals — the Radeon R7 M350 and Quadro K620 — show it competes with entry-level mobile and workstation parts, making it a fit only for low-intensity, legacy environments.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every modern compute-intensive task: 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 for simulation and rendering, 70 RT cores for ray tracing, 280 tensor cores for AI inference, and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth for large datasets. Its 16 GB GDDR7 capacity supports high-resolution textures and deep learning models, while PCIe 5.0 x16 ensures fast host communication. Its dual-slot design and 350 W TDP require more physical space and power, but the performance payoff is enormous. For gaming, content creation, or professional visualization built after 2020, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only rational choice — the WX 4100 cannot access DirectX 12 Ultimate features or Vulkan 1.4, and its 2.460 TFLOPS compute is a fraction of what modern workloads demand. The benchmark data, percentile placements, and architectural specifications all converge on the same conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a modern powerhouse, while the WX 4100 is a legacy artifact.