AMD Radeon PRO W7900D vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900D

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2156 MHz
TDP 295 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

CORE STATE GB206
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
N/A
122,238
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
116,960
passmark_directx_10
N/A
129
passmark_directx_11
N/A
192
passmark_directx_12
N/A
93
passmark_directx_9
N/A
214
passmark_g2d
N/A
896
passmark_g3d
N/A
20,355
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
8,279

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900D vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two GPUs into completely different usage domains. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D carries a workstation pedigree with massive memory capacity and compute throughput, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built for portable gaming with a focus on efficiency and modern feature support.

The AMD side wins on raw computational scale. Its 52.99 TFLOPS FP32 throughput dwarfs the mobile NVIDIA part's 13.13 TFLOPS, a 4x advantage in raw shader math. The Radeon PRO W7900D also delivers 827.9 GTexel/s texture rate versus 205.2 GTexel/s, and 414.0 GPixel/s pixel rate versus 68.40 GPixel/s. These are the metrics that drive professional rendering, simulation, and scientific workloads where massive parallel compute is the primary requirement.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile wins in the mobile segment by existing where the AMD card cannot. The Radeon PRO W7900D is a triple-slot, 280 mm long desktop card drawing 295 W with dual 8-pin power connectors. The RTX 5070 Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 50 W TDP, no power connectors, and dimensions described as portable device dependent. The database shows the RTX 5070 Mobile achieves a 75th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the Radeon PRO W7900D sits at the 50th percentile despite its far larger silicon.

The NVIDIA card also brings dedicated tensor cores, 144 of them, which the AMD workstation part lacks entirely. This matters for AI inference and machine learning workloads that rely on tensor acceleration. The RTX 5070 Mobile also uses the newer Blackwell 2.0 architecture with PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the AMD card uses RDNA 3.0 with PCIe 4.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D delivers 864.0 GB/s over a 384 bit bus with 48 GB of GDDR6 memory. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile provides 384.0 GB/s over a 128 bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: How do the transistor counts compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D uses 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die with 109.1M transistors per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile uses 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die with 121.0M transistors per mm².

Q: Which card is more power efficient?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has a 50 W TDP, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7900D has a 295 W TDP. The NVIDIA part achieves its performance at roughly one-sixth the power draw.

Q: Do both support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 according to the API specifications in the database.

Q: What are the clock speeds?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D runs at 1327 MHz base and 2156 MHz boost with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile runs at 907 MHz base and 1425 MHz boost with memory at 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective).

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing cores?

A: Both have ray tracing capability. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D has 96 RT cores, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has 36 RT cores. The NVIDIA card additionally has 144 tensor cores, which the AMD card does not have.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two specific GPUs. However, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has substantial benchmark data that places it in context. Its average benchmark score is 29,928, which places it 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29,945 score), 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (29,783 score), 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30,095 score), and 1.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (30,433 score).

Breaking down the RTX 5070 Mobile's individual benchmark results shows its strengths. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 122,238, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 116,960. The PassMark suite shows 20,355 in G3D, 8,279 in GPU compute, 896 in G2D, 214 in DirectX 9, 192 in DirectX 11, 129 in DirectX 10, and 93 in DirectX 12. These numbers indicate the mobile GPU performs best in compute-oriented tests and older DirectX versions, while its DirectX 12 score trails its other results relatively.

Without direct head-to-head measurements, the comparison relies on specification analysis. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D's 52.99 TFLOPS FP32 versus the RTX 5070 Mobile's 13.13 TFLOPS represents a 4x compute gap. The AMD card's 864.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is 2.25x the NVIDIA card's 384.0 GB/s. The Radeon PRO W7900D has 6,144 shading units versus 4,608, 384 TMUs versus 144, and 192 ROPs versus 48. These specification differences point to the AMD card being designed for sustained heavy workloads where the NVIDIA mobile part would struggle to maintain comparable output.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs diverge across nearly every measurable specification. Memory capacity differs by 6x: 48 GB GDDR6 on the AMD side versus 8 GB GDDR7 on the NVIDIA side. Bus width is 384 bit versus 128 bit. Clock speeds differ substantially, with the AMD card boosting to 2156 MHz versus 1425 MHz for the NVIDIA part.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D offers 6,144 shading units, 384 TMUs, 192 ROPs, and 96 RT cores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has 4,608 shading units, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. The AMD card also has significantly higher pixel rate (414.0 GPixel/s versus 68.40 GPixel/s) and texture rate (827.9 GTexel/s versus 205.2 GTexel/s).

Power requirements could not be more different: 295 W TDP with dual 8-pin connectors and a 600 W suggested PSU on the AMD side, versus 50 W TDP with no connectors and no suggested PSU on the NVIDIA mobile part. Physical dimensions reflect this: the AMD card is 280 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 51 mm wide in a triple-slot form factor, while the NVIDIA part is an IGP with portable device dependent dimensions.

Bus interface also differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs show the AMD card with 3x DisplayPort 2.1 plus 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the NVIDIA card's outputs are portable device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D uses the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile uses the GB206 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 Mobile series. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but their transistor densities differ: 109.1M per mm² for the AMD chip versus 121.0M per mm² for the NVIDIA chip.

The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the NVIDIA card's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile. Release dates place the AMD card at September 2025 and the NVIDIA card at April 2025. Both are marked as Active production status.

The architectural philosophies diverge most clearly in compute features. The AMD RDNA 3.0 design allocates all 96 RT cores to ray tracing but has no tensor cores. The NVIDIA Blackwell 2.0 design includes both 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, suggesting a more balanced approach to graphics and AI workloads. The AMD card's memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the NVIDIA card's GDDR7 runs at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed, indicating newer memory technology on the smaller, more power-efficient part.

The 57,700 million transistor count on the AMD die versus 21,900 million on the NVIDIA die reflects the workstation card's focus on massive parallel compute resources. The 529 mm² die size versus 181 mm² also confirms this: the AMD card devotes silicon area to raw throughput, while the NVIDIA mobile chip prioritizes density and efficiency.

The Verdict

The data shows two GPUs built for different purposes with no meaningful overlap. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900D delivers workstation-class compute with 52.99 TFLOPS FP32, 48 GB of memory, and 864.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its 295 W TDP and triple-slot physical footprint make it unsuitable for portable systems. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile delivers 13.13 TFLOPS FP32, 8 GB of memory, and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth in a 50 W IGP package.

The percentile rankings tell an interesting story: the NVIDIA mobile GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, while the AMD workstation card sits at the 50th percentile. This likely reflects the database's benchmark composition, which includes the RTX 5070 Mobile's nine recorded benchmark scores averaging 29,928, while the AMD card has no recorded benchmarks in the database.

Users requiring maximum compute throughput, large memory capacity for complex datasets, or professional rendering workloads should consider the AMD Radeon PRO W7900D. Its 4x FP32 advantage and 2.25x memory bandwidth advantage over the RTX 5070 Mobile provide the headroom needed for sustained professional workloads.

Users needing GPU acceleration in a laptop or compact system should consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. Its 50 W TDP, tensor cores for AI workloads, PCIe 5.0 support, and GDDR7 memory make it a capable mobile solution. The benchmark data shows it performs competitively with desktop GPUs from previous generations, sitting within 1.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 6700 and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti.

The choice comes down to deployment scenario. The AMD card offers workstation-class compute in a desktop chassis. The NVIDIA card offers mid-range desktop performance in a mobile form factor. Neither can substitute for the other in their respective environments.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7900D
RTX 5070 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,144
4,608 -25.0%
Shaders
6,144
4,608 -25.0%
TMUs
384
144 -62.5%
ROPs
192
48 -75.0%
Compute Units
96
—
SM Count
—
36
Clocks
Base Clock
1327 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
2156 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 24 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
48 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
49,152
8,192 -83.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
384 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
864.0 GB/s
384.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
32 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
—
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
414.0 GPixel/s
68.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
827.9 GTexel/s
205.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
52.99 TFLOPS
13.13 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.656 TFLOPS (1:32)
205.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
52.99 TFLOPS (1:1)
13.13 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
96
36 -62.5%
Tensor Cores
—
144
Matrix Cores
192
—
Power
TDP
295 W
50 W
TDP (W)
295
50 -83.1%
Suggested PSU
600 W
—
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 31
GB206
Codename
Plum Bonito
—
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
21,900 million
Die Size
529 mm²
181 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
109.1M / mm²
121.0M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
—
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
—
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Triple-slot
IGP
Length
280 mm 11 inches
—
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
—
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
GeForce 40 Mobile
View Radeon PRO W7900D Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Details