AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arc Pro B70 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2495 MHz
TDP 295 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc Pro B70

CORE STATE BMG-G31
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2800 MHz
TDP 230 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe2-HPG
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
84,379
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
137,070
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arc Pro B70

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arc Pro B70

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and the Intel Arc Pro B70. The Arc Pro B70 has no recorded benchmark scores in our database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The Radeon PRO W7900, by contrast, has two recorded benchmark entries: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,379 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 137,070, producing an average benchmark score of 110,725 and a percentile rank of 94.

Because the Arc Pro B70 lacks any recorded scores, a direct numerical comparison between the two cards is not possible from the available data. The Radeon PRO W7900’s nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. It sits 1% above the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II (average score 109,617), 3.2% above the AMD Radeon Pro W6600X (107,342), 2.8% below the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (113,944), and 3.2% below the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114,395). This places the W7900 in a competitive band around 110,000 to 114,000 average benchmark points, with a slight edge over older AMD workstation cards and a small deficit against those two NVIDIA offerings.

The Arc Pro B70’s lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be validated against the W7900 or any other GPU in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder, not a measured result. Until benchmark entries are populated for the Arc Pro B70, any performance comparison relies entirely on architectural and specification differences rather than empirical scores.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use different GPU architectures from different manufacturers. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 uses the Navi 31 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Plum Bonito, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel Arc Pro B70 uses the BMG-G31 chip, built on Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation.

Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The W7900’s Navi 31 die measures 529 mm² and contains 57,700 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The Arc Pro B70’s BMG-G31 die is smaller at 368 mm², with transistor count listed as unknown and no density figure recorded.

Core configurations differ significantly. The Radeon PRO W7900 has 6,144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 192 render output units, and 96 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. Neither card has tensor cores listed.

Compute throughput tells a clear story. The W7900 delivers 61.32 TFLOPS FP32 and 61.32 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The Arc Pro B70 delivers 22.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 45.88 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The W7900 has roughly 2.7 times the FP32 throughput and 1.3 times the FP16 throughput of the Arc Pro B70.

Clock speeds favor the Intel card. The Arc Pro B70 has a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The Radeon PRO W7900 has a base clock of 1760 MHz and a boost clock of 2495 MHz. The Arc Pro B70 runs about 30% higher at base and 12% higher at boost, but its lower core count and narrower memory bus prevent it from matching the W7900’s raw compute output.

Pixel and texture rates follow the core counts. The W7900 achieves 479.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 958.1 GTexel/s texture rate. The Arc Pro B70 achieves 358.4 GPixel/s and 716.8 GTexel/s. The W7900 leads by about 34% in pixel rate and 34% in texture rate.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Radeon PRO W7900 wins decisively in raw compute, memory capacity, and memory bandwidth. Its 61.32 TFLOPS FP32 output is 2.7 times the Arc Pro B70’s 22.94 TFLOPS. Its 48 GB GDDR6 memory doubles the Arc Pro B70’s 32 GB, and its 864.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the Arc Pro B70’s 608.0 GB/s by 42%. The W7900 also has triple the ray tracing cores (96 vs 32), which suggests stronger ray tracing workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 wins on power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 230 W TDP is 65 W lower than the W7900’s 295 W. It uses a single 8-pin power connector versus the W7900’s dual 8-pin connectors, and its suggested PSU is 550 W versus 600 W. The Arc Pro B70 is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 39 mm in width. The W7900 is a triple-slot card measuring 280 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width. The Arc Pro B70 is 13 mm shorter and 12 mm thinner, making it easier to fit in compact workstation cases.

The Arc Pro B70 also has a higher boost clock at 2800 MHz versus 2495 MHz, and a faster memory clock at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). These higher clocks indicate better frequency headroom, but they do not compensate for the W7900’s larger core count and wider 384-bit memory bus.

The launch MSRP for the Radeon PRO W7900 is 3,999 USD. The launch MSRP for the Intel Arc Pro B70 is 949 USD.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two cards differ, based on the database records.

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7900 | Intel Arc Pro B70 |

|---------------|----------------------|-------------------|

| Chip | Navi 31 | BMG-G31 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Codename | Plum Bonito | None listed |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | Battlemage (Pro Series) |

| Transistors | 57,700 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 529 mm² | 368 mm² |

| Transistor density | 109.1M / mm² | None listed |

| Base clock | 1760 MHz | 2280 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2495 MHz | 2800 MHz |

| Memory clock | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2375 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 48 GB | 32 GB |

| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 864.0 GB/s | 608.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 6144 | 4096 |

| Texture mapping units | 384 | 256 |

| Render output units | 192 | 128 |

| Ray tracing cores | 96 | 32 |

| Pixel rate | 479.0 GPixel/s | 358.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 958.1 GTexel/s | 716.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 61.32 TFLOPS | 22.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 61.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | 45.88 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 295 W | 230 W |

| Slot width | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Dimensions | 280 mm x 110 mm x 51 mm | 267 mm x 110 mm x 39 mm |

| Production status | Active | None listed |

| Release date | 2023-05-25 | 2026-03-25 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | None listed |

| Launch MSRP | 3,999 USD | 949 USD |

| Average benchmark score | 110,725 | 0 |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 94 | 50 |

| Nearest rivals | Radeon Pro Vega II, RTX A5500 Mobile, Radeon Pro W6600X, Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | None listed |

Both cards share the same process node (5 nm, TSMC), memory type (GDDR6), API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), height (110 mm), and predecessor status in the case of the Arc Pro B70 (none listed).

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 delivers 61.32 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Pro B70 delivers 22.94 TFLOPS FP32. The W7900 has approximately 2.7 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: How much memory does each card have, and what is the bandwidth difference?

A: The Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB GDDR6 with 864.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 384-bit bus. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 32 GB GDDR6 with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 256-bit bus. The W7900 offers 42% more bandwidth.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B70 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Arc Pro B70 has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50. The Radeon PRO W7900 has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,379 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 137,070.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Radeon PRO W7900 has a 295 W TDP, uses two 8-pin power connectors, and requires a 600 W suggested PSU. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has a 230 W TDP, uses one 8-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card supports PCIe 5.0?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: When was each card released?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 was released on 2023-05-25. The Intel Arc Pro B70 was released on 2026-03-25.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the clear performance leader based on every recorded compute metric. Its FP32 output of 61.32 TFLOPS dwarfs the Arc Pro B70’s 22.94 TFLOPS. Its 48 GB memory capacity and 864.0 GB/s bandwidth suit large datasets and high-resolution rendering workloads. The W7900’s 96 ray tracing cores triple the Arc Pro B70’s 32, and its pixel rate of 479.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 958.1 GTexel/s both exceed the Arc Pro B70 by roughly one-third. The database confirms the W7900 performs at the 94th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 110,725.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 has no measured benchmark data, so its actual performance is unverified. Its architecture does offer advantages in power draw and physical size. The 230 W TDP, single 8-pin connector, and dual-slot profile make it easier to integrate into space-constrained builds. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides double the bus bandwidth of the W7900’s PCIe 4.0 x16, which could benefit data transfer in supported systems. The higher boost clock of 2800 MHz and memory clock of 2375 MHz indicate the design has frequency headroom, but the lower core counts and 256-bit memory bus limit its ceiling.

Users who need maximum compute throughput, the largest memory pool, and proven benchmark scores should select the Radeon PRO W7900. Users who prioritize lower power consumption, a smaller card footprint, and a much lower launch MSRP of 949 USD versus 3,999 USD should consider the Intel Arc Pro B70, provided they accept that its performance is not yet verified in the database. The release date difference matters as well: the W7900 launched in May 2023, while the Arc Pro B70 launched in March 2026, making the Intel card a newer design with more recent features such as PCIe 5.0. The choice hinges on whether verified performance and raw specifications outweigh the Arc Pro B70’s efficiency, size, and price advantages.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7900
Pro B70
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,144
4,096 -33.3%
Shaders
6,144
4,096 -33.3%
TMUs
384
256 -33.3%
ROPs
192
128 -33.3%
Compute Units
96
Execution Units
32
Clocks
Base Clock
1760 MHz
2280 MHz
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
2375 MHz 19 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
48 GB
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
49,152
32,768 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
384 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
864.0 GB/s
608.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
L2 Cache
6 MB
24 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
358.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
716.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS
22.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.916 TFLOPS (1:32)
2.867 TFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
61.32 TFLOPS (1:1)
45.88 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
96
32 -66.7%
XMX Cores
256
Matrix Cores
192
Power
TDP
295 W
230 W
TDP (W)
295
230 -22.0%
Suggested PSU
600 W
550 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Xe2-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 31
BMG-G31
Codename
Plum Bonito
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Battlemage (Pro Series)
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
unknown
Die Size
529 mm²
368 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
109.1M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Triple-slot
Dual-slot
Length
280 mm 11 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
110 mm 4.3 inches
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.11x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
3,999 USD
949 USD
Production
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
View Radeon PRO W7900 Details View Arc Pro B70 Details