AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile occupy very different segments of the GPU market, one a dual-slot workstation card, the other an integrated mobile part. The recorded data shows a clear hierarchy, but the comparison is far from one-dimensional. This analysis uses only the benchmark scores, specifications, and rival comparisons from the database to break down how these two GPUs stack up.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database includes two direct head-to-head benchmark results between these GPUs, and the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 wins both. In Geekbench OpenCL, the W7800 scores 154366 against the RTX 5070 Mobile's 122238, a 26.3% advantage. The gap widens considerably in Geekbench Vulkan, where the W7800 delivers 175422 versus 116960, a 50% lead for AMD. These are the only two tests where both cards appear in the same dataset, so the head-to-head record stands at 2 wins for AMD and 0 for NVIDIA.

Looking at the broader average benchmark score, the W7800 posts 164894, while the RTX 5070 Mobile averages 29928. That is a massive difference, but it reflects the fact that the mobile part's scores include several Passmark tests with low absolute numbers, whereas the W7800 only has Geekbench entries. The percentile rankings confirm the divide: the W7800 sits in the 97th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 5070 Mobile ranks in the 75th percentile.

The nearest rival data places each card in its own competitive context. The W7800's closest competitor is the NVIDIA RTX A5500 with an average score of 165217, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the W7800 trails that card by a negligible margin. It also sits within 1.5% of the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB (162504) and 2.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X (168574). For the RTX 5070 Mobile, its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti with an average score of 29945, a delta of -0.1%, and it is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti (29783). These comparisons show that while the W7800 trades blows with high-end workstation GPUs, the RTX 5070 Mobile lands in the same performance band as previous-generation desktop enthusiast cards.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 wins decisively in both compute-oriented Geekbench tests. Its OpenCL score of 154366 and Vulkan score of 175422 indicate strong raw throughput for professional workloads that leverage these APIs. The 50% Vulkan advantage is particularly notable, suggesting the RDNA 3.0 architecture handles that API efficiently. The W7800 also holds a significant edge in memory capacity with 32 GB of GDDR6, which supports large datasets that would exceed the 8 GB GDDR7 frame buffer on the RTX 5070 Mobile. Its 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth dwarfs the mobile part's 384.0 GB/s, and its 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 compute is more than three times the RTX 5070 Mobile's 13.13 TFLOPS.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile wins in the portability and efficiency domain, though the database does not include direct benchmark wins in that area. Its 50 W TDP is drastically lower than the W7800's 260 W, and it uses no external power connectors, while the W7800 requires two 8-pin connectors and a 600 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5070 Mobile also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, a newer bus interface than the W7800's PCIe 4.0 x16. Its 144 tensor cores are a feature absent from the W7800's specification list, which indicates an advantage for AI-accelerated tasks in mobile environments. The mobile part's Passmark scores, while low in absolute terms, show a different performance profile: Passmark G3D of 20355 and GPU compute of 8279, with DirectX 9 scoring 214, DirectX 11 at 192, and DirectX 10 at 129. These results place it in line with desktop GPUs from a few generations ago, as its nearest rival deltas show.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 uses the Navi 31 chip built on RDNA 3.0, with the codename Plum Bonito and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The RTX 5070 Mobile uses the GB206 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50-series and GeForce 50 Mobile generation. It is also built on a 5 nm TSMC process but packs 21,900 million transistors on a much smaller 181 mm² die, achieving a higher density of 121.0M per mm².

Core configuration differs substantially. The W7800 has 4480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 70 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4608 shading units, which is slightly more, but only 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 36 RT cores. The mobile part also includes 144 tensor cores, a feature the W7800 lacks entirely. Clock speeds tell a similar story: the W7800 runs at a base of 1895 MHz and boosts to 2525 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Mobile has a base of 907 MHz and a boost of 1425 MHz. The lower clocks on the mobile part are a direct consequence of its 50 W power envelope, which also explains its 68.40 GPixel/s pixel rate and 205.2 GTexel/s texture rate versus the W7800's 323.2 GPixel/s and 707.0 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The W7800 uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 576.0 GB/s bandwidth with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The RTX 5070 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s with a memory clock of 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective). While GDDR7 is a newer memory type, the W7800's larger capacity and wider bus give it a clear bandwidth advantage. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The W7800 offers 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the RTX 5070 Mobile's display outputs are marked as portable device dependent. The W7800 measures 280 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, whereas the RTX 5070 Mobile has no recorded dimensions due to its integrated nature.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 averages 164894 across its recorded benchmarks, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile averages 29928. The W7800 also ranks in the 97th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the 75th percentile for the RTX 5070 Mobile.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the head-to-head tests?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the W7800 leads by 26.3% (154366 versus 122238). In Geekbench Vulkan, the W7800 leads by 50% (175422 versus 116960). The W7800 wins both recorded head-to-head tests.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each GPU?

A: For the W7800, the closest rival is the NVIDIA RTX A5500 with an average score of 165217, a delta of -0.2%. Other near rivals include the RTX 4500 Ada Generation (166094, delta -0.7%), the A100 PCIe 40 GB (162504, delta 1.5%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X (168574, delta -2.2%). For the RTX 5070 Mobile, the closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti with an average score of 29945, a delta of -0.1%, followed by the RTX 2080 Ti (29783, delta 0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095, delta -0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (30433, delta -1.7%).

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The W7800 has a TDP of 260 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors along with a 600 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5070 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W and uses no power connectors, making it suitable for integrated laptop designs.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The W7800 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and RT cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4608 shading units, which is more than the W7800's 4480. However, the W7800 has 70 ray tracing cores, nearly double the RTX 5070 Mobile's 36 RT cores.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture for compute-heavy professional workloads: the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 is the stronger GPU by a wide margin. Its 50% lead in Geekbench Vulkan and 26.3% lead in Geekbench OpenCL, combined with 32 GB of memory, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 performance, make it suitable for large-scale rendering, scientific simulation, and other tasks that demand raw throughput. Its 97th percentile ranking and proximity to rivals like the RTX A5500 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation confirm it belongs in the high-end workstation tier.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, while far behind in raw compute, delivers that performance at a fraction of the power draw. Its 50 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it practical for thin-and-light laptops, and its 144 tensor cores provide an AI acceleration feature that the W7800 does not list. Its nearest rivals, including the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti, show that it performs at the level of older desktop enthusiast cards, which is respectable for an integrated mobile solution. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for mainstream gaming and lighter professional tasks, but they will bottleneck workloads that exceed that capacity.

For users selecting a desktop workstation for heavy compute, rendering, or data-intensive applications, the W7800 is the only choice based on the recorded scores. For users who need a mobile GPU with modest power requirements, the RTX 5070 Mobile offers a functional balance of performance and efficiency, though it cannot approach the W7800 in absolute throughput. The launch MSRP for the W7800 is 2,499 USD, while the RTX 5070 Mobile has no recorded launch price. The verdict depends entirely on the deployment scenario: fixed installation versus portable system, and the benchmark data supports the W7800 for maximum performance and the RTX 5070 Mobile for low-power mobility.