AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison because the two products sit at very different stages of their measurement lifecycles. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has accumulated substantial benchmark results, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This asymmetry defines the entire analysis.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 records an average benchmark score of 118,976 across two tests. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 108,245, while its Geekbench Vulkan score reaches 129,706. These results place the card at the 95th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, which simply means no benchmark data has been collected yet.

In terms of raw compute, the AMD card delivers 31.95 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 63.90 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The Intel card provides 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16. These figures indicate the AMD card has substantially higher raw floating-point throughput, though the Intel card uses a different architectural approach that may express performance differently across workloads.

The memory configuration favors the Intel card in capacity: 24 GB versus 16 GB. However, the AMD card has higher memory bandwidth at 576.0 GB/s versus 456.0 GB/s. The AMD card also uses a wider 256-bit memory bus compared to Intel's 192-bit bus. For memory-bound workloads, the AMD card has a clear bandwidth advantage; for large datasets that exceed 16 GB, the Intel card's extra capacity becomes relevant.

The AMD card wins on pixel throughput with 249.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and on texture throughput with 499.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. The AMD card also has more shading units (3072 versus 2560), more TMUs (192 versus 160), more ROPs (96 versus 80), and more ray tracing cores (48 versus 20). These hardware advantages translate into higher theoretical peak performance across most graphics workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, code-named Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The chip is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The transistor density is 81.2 million per mm².

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip built on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage Pro Series. It is also manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The transistor density is 72.1 million per mm². Both chips come from the same foundry and process node, but the AMD chip packs more transistors into a larger die area.

Clock speeds differ notably. The AMD card has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The Intel card has a higher base clock at 2000 MHz but a lower boost clock at 2400 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD card runs memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel card runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective. Despite the higher memory clock, the Intel card has lower total bandwidth because of its narrower bus.

Power delivery diverges sharply. The AMD card has a TDP of 190 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Intel card has a TDP of 400 W, uses a 16-pin power connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 800 W. Both cards are dual-slot designs, but the Intel card is physically longer at 300 mm (11.8 inches) versus 241 mm (9.5 inches) for the AMD card. The Intel card is also wider at 40 mm (1.6 inches) versus no recorded width for the AMD card.

Interface support also differs. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8. The PCIe 5.0 interface provides higher per-lane bandwidth, which may benefit the Intel card in certain data-transfer scenarios despite having fewer lanes. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs are similar in standard but differ in form factor: the AMD card has 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel card has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear performance hierarchy based on recorded measurements. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has an average benchmark score of 118,976 and sits at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GB10 with an average score of 117,393 and a delta of 1.3 percent, the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation with a score of 117,088 and a delta of 1.6 percent, the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 114,395 and a delta of 4 percent, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile with 113,944 and a delta of 4.4 percent. These deltas indicate the AMD card leads its closest competitors by single-digit percentages.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark data, so it cannot be directly compared on measured performance. Its 50th percentile rank reflects the absence of scores rather than actual performance. The hardware specifications suggest it targets a different segment: 24 GB of memory and a 400 W TDP indicate a card designed for large-memory workloads with higher power draw, while its lower FP32 throughput suggests it may not compete head-to-head with the AMD card on raw compute.

For users who need maximum measured performance, the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is the choice based on available data. It delivers higher FP32 and FP16 throughput, higher memory bandwidth, more shading units, more ray tracing cores, and a smaller physical footprint with lower power requirements. The Intel card offers more memory capacity and a newer PCIe interface, but its performance characteristics remain unmeasured in the database.

The AMD card was released on November 12, 2023, with a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The Intel card was released on September 4, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The Intel card is marked as Active in production status, while the AMD card has no recorded production status.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 delivers 31.95 TFLOPS of FP32 and 63.90 TFLOPS of FP16, compared to 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The AMD card has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card has more capacity, while the AMD card has more bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD card has a TDP of 190 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. The Intel card has a TDP of 400 W, uses a 16-pin power connector, and suggests an 800 W PSU.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has 48 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 20 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the benchmark percentile for each card?

A: The AMD card sits at the 95th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 118,976. The Intel card sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded benchmark data.

Q: How do the physical dimensions compare?

A: The AMD card is 241 mm (9.5 inches) long and 111 mm (4.4 inches) high. The Intel card is 300 mm (11.8 inches) long, 110 mm (4.3 inches) high, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) wide. Both are dual-slot designs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark comparison is complicated by the fact that the database contains no paired benchmark results for these two cards. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has recorded scores in two tests: Geekbench OpenCL at 108,245 and Geekbench Vulkan at 129,706. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores at all.

The absence of Intel benchmark data means every head-to-head comparison must rely on hardware specifications rather than measured results. On FP32 throughput, the AMD card delivers 31.95 TFLOPS, which is approximately 2.6 times the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS. On FP16 throughput, the AMD card's 63.90 TFLOPS is approximately 2.6 times the Intel card's 24.58 TFLOPS. These ratios come directly from the recorded specifications.

Memory bandwidth provides another clear comparison point. The AMD card's 576.0 GB/s exceeds the Intel card's 456.0 GB/s by approximately 26 percent. The pixel rate of the AMD card at 249.6 GPixel/s exceeds the Intel card's 192.0 GPixel/s by approximately 30 percent. The texture rate of the AMD card at 499.2 GTexel/s exceeds the Intel card's 384.0 GTexel/s by approximately 30 percent.

The AMD card has 3072 shading units versus 2560 for the Intel card, a difference of 512 units. It has 192 TMUs versus 160, a difference of 32. It has 96 ROPs versus 80, a difference of 16. It has 48 ray tracing cores versus 20, a difference of 28. Each of these differences favors the AMD card in theoretical peak throughput.

The Intel card does hold advantages in specific areas. Its 24 GB memory capacity is 50 percent larger than the AMD card's 16 GB. Its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides a newer bus standard compared to the AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x16. Its base clock of 2000 MHz is higher than the AMD card's 1900 MHz, and its memory clock of 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) exceeds the AMD card's 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The Intel card also has a higher launch MSRP of 1,199 USD compared to the AMD card's 999 USD, though pricing analysis is limited to these stated figures. The Intel card is physically larger in length and width, and it requires a more substantial power supply. The AMD card has a higher transistor count (28,100 million versus 19,600 million), a larger die (346 mm² versus 272 mm²), and higher transistor density (81.2M per mm² versus 72.1M per mm²).

Given the absence of measured Intel performance data, the recorded evidence points to the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 as the higher-performing card on paper. Its benchmark scores place it at the 95th percentile, and its nearest rivals in the database are all within 4.4 percent of its average score. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, with no recorded scores, cannot be positioned relative to the AMD card or any other GPU in the database on measured performance. Its specifications suggest a different design target, but the data does not yet support a performance verdict for the Intel card.