AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has two benchmark entries in the database: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 81,528 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 92,688. These produce an average benchmark score of 87,108, which places the card at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its percentile ranking is 50th. With no head-to-head benchmark entries and no wins recorded for either side, the quantitative comparison rests entirely on the AMD card's measured performance and the Intel card's absence of measured data.

The AMD card's average score of 87,108 places it in a specific competitive band. The nearest rival data shows the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 at 87,445, which is 0.4% higher, a negligible difference. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX scores 85,637, which is 1.7% lower than the AMD card. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scores 91,134, placing it 4.4% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 scores 91,671, which is 5.0% higher. This indicates that the Radeon PRO W7600 sits just below the RTX A4500 tier in raw compute benchmarks, while essentially matching the Quadro GP100 and clearly outpacing the CMP 40HX.

For the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, the database shows no scores to interpret. The percentile field of 50 represents a midpoint placement, but with zero recorded average score, this figure does not reflect any measured performance. The absence of benchmark data means the Intel card cannot be positioned against the AMD card or any other GPU in the database based on measured results. The analysis for the Intel card must rely on its architectural and specification data rather than performance measurements.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear but one-sided conclusion. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is a measured, active product with concrete benchmark scores. Its 93rd percentile ranking and average score of 87,108 demonstrate that it performs in the upper tier of the database's GPU population. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark results, so its performance cannot be verified or compared directly.

For users requiring verified compute performance, the Radeon PRO W7600 is the only option with data supporting its capabilities. Its nearest rival comparisons show it trading blows with the Quadro GP100 and trailing the RTX A4500 by 4.4% to 5.0%, which positions it as a solid mid-to-upper tier workstation card. The Intel card's 50th percentile placeholder and zero average score offer no evidence of competitive performance. Based strictly on recorded data, the AMD card is the verified choice, while the Intel card remains unproven in this database.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip built on Xe2-HPG architecture. It belongs to the Battlemage generation, specifically the Pro Series. The chip is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip has significantly more transistors, a larger die, and a denser packing of those transistors compared to the AMD chip.

Ray tracing hardware differs between the two. The AMD card has 32 ray tracing cores, while the Intel card has 20. Neither card lists tensor cores, so the AI acceleration comparison is limited to the ray tracing hardware and the compute units. The AMD card has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The Intel card has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The Intel card has more of each of these fundamental compute resources, yet its FP32 throughput is lower, which indicates architectural differences in how those units are utilized.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card offers three times the memory capacity and substantially higher bandwidth.

Clock speeds show a mixed picture. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz. The Intel card has a higher base clock of 2000 MHz but a slightly lower boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory clocks differ as well: the AMD card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel card runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Compute throughput favors the AMD card despite its smaller resource counts. The AMD card delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 39.98 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio. The Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 at the same 2:1 ratio. The AMD card is roughly 63% ahead in FP32 and FP16 throughput. Pixel and texture rates also favor the AMD card: 156.2 GPixel/s and 312.3 GTexel/s for AMD versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s for Intel. Here the Intel card is ahead, delivering 23% higher pixel throughput and 23% higher texture throughput.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The AMD card has a TDP of 130 W, uses a single 6-pin power connector, and requires a 300 W suggested power supply. The Intel card has a TDP of 400 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires an 800 W suggested power supply. The AMD card is single-slot, while the Intel card is dual-slot. The AMD card measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Intel card measures 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Intel card is longer but slightly shorter in height, and it has a defined width due to its dual-slot design.

Bus interfaces and display outputs also differ. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8 and has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so the API feature set is identical. Release dates are far apart: the AMD card launched on 2023-08-02, while the Intel card launched on 2025-09-04. The AMD card lists its predecessor as Radeon Pro Vega and its launch MSRP as 599 USD. The Intel card has no predecessor listed and its launch MSRP is 1,199 USD.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher measured benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has recorded scores of 81,528 in Geekbench OpenCL and 92,688 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 87,108. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores, so no comparison is possible from the data.

Q: How does the AMD card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD card's average score of 87,108 is 0.4% below the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, 1.7% above the NVIDIA CMP 40HX, 4.4% below the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile, and 5.0% below the NVIDIA RTX A4500.

Q: What are the memory capacities and bandwidths of the two cards?

A: The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD card delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. The AMD card is ahead by approximately 63% in this metric.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD card has a 130 W TDP, uses a single 6-pin power connector, and requires a 300 W suggested power supply. The Intel card has a 400 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires an 800 W suggested power supply.

Q: When did each card launch, and at what MSRP?

A: The AMD card launched on 2023-08-02 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The Intel card launched on 2025-09-04 with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in every category where measured data exists. Its FP32 throughput of 19.99 TFLOPS exceeds the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS, its FP16 throughput of 39.98 TFLOPS exceeds the Intel card's 24.58 TFLOPS, and its benchmark scores place it at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs. The AMD card also wins on power efficiency, with a 130 W TDP versus the Intel card's 400 W TDP, and on physical footprint, being single-slot versus the Intel card's dual-slot design. Its 241 mm length is shorter than the Intel card's 300 mm length, making it easier to fit in compact chassis.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on memory and bandwidth specifications. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory is three times the AMD card's 8 GB, and its 456.0 GB/s bandwidth is 58% higher than the AMD card's 288.0 GB/s. The Intel card also has a higher base clock at 2000 MHz versus 1720 MHz, though its boost clock is slightly lower at 2400 MHz versus 2440 MHz. The Intel card has more shading units, texture mapping units, and render output units, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s both exceed the AMD card's corresponding figures of 156.2 GPixel/s and 312.3 GTexel/s. The Intel card also uses the newer PCIe 5.0 x8 interface versus the AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x8.

The Intel card's transistor count of 19,600 million exceeds the AMD card's 13,300 million, and its 5 nm process node is smaller than the AMD card's 6 nm node. However, these architectural advantages do not translate into higher measured compute throughput, as the FP32 and FP16 figures both favor the AMD card. The Intel card is also newer, having launched on 2025-09-04 versus the AMD card's 2023-08-02 launch date.

For workloads that depend on raw FP32 or FP16 compute, the AMD card is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For workloads that require large memory capacity or high memory bandwidth, the Intel card's specifications suggest it would be better suited, though no benchmark data confirms this. For ray tracing, the AMD card has 32 ray tracing cores versus the Intel card's 20, favoring AMD in that specific area. The Intel card's higher pixel and texture rates could benefit rasterization-heavy tasks, but again, no measured performance confirms this advantage. The database shows the AMD card as the verified performer, while the Intel card remains a specification sheet without test results to back its capabilities.