AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B390 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and the Intel Arc Pro B390. The AMD card has recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel part has no entries in the benchmark database. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 posts an average benchmark score of 87,108 across its recorded tests. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 81,528, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 92,688. These results place the card at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no benchmark entries and no average score. Its percentile ranking sits at 50, which reflects the absence of recorded data rather than actual performance. The database shows zero wins for either product in head-to-head comparisons.

Looking at the AMD card's nearest rivals provides some context for its standing. The NVIDIA Quadro GP100 averages 87,445, which is 0.4% ahead of the Radeon PRO W7600. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX scores 85,637, putting it 1.7% behind the AMD part. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile reaches 91,134, a 4.4% advantage over the Radeon. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 leads by 5% with an average of 91,671.

The Radeon PRO W7600 sits in a tight competitive band. It trails the Quadro GP100 by less than half a percent, a margin well within normal run-to-run variance. The gap to the RTX A4500 and RTX A4500 Mobile is more substantial at 4.4% to 5%, but those are higher-tier mobile and workstation parts. The CMP 40HX, a mining-oriented card, is the only rival the Radeon beats outright.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture. Its codename is Hotpink Bonefish, and it belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The silicon is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation. Intel fabricates this part on its own 3 nm process. The database lists transistor count, die size, and transistor density as unknown for the Intel part.

The Radeon PRO W7600 is a discrete graphics card with a single-slot design. It requires a 300 W power supply and draws power through a single 6-pin connector. Its TDP is 130 W. The card measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and outputs video through four DisplayPort 2.1 connections.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is an integrated graphics processor. Its slot width is listed as IGP, its bus interface is IGP, and it has no power connectors. The TDP is 80 W. Display outputs are described as portable device dependent, and no physical dimensions are recorded.

Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. Neither card has dedicated tensor cores.

Clock behavior differs significantly. The Radeon PRO W7600 runs at a 1720 MHz base clock and boosts to 2440 MHz. Memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a 300 MHz base clock and a 2500 MHz boost clock. Its memory clock is listed as system shared.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 2,048 shading units, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 has 1,536. The AMD card also has more texture mapping units (128 versus 48) and more render output units (64 versus 24).

Q: What are the memory configurations of these two products?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory, with its type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system.

Q: How do the compute capabilities compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 39.98 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The Intel Arc Pro B390 delivers 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 and 15.36 TFLOPS of FP16. Both use a 2:1 ratio for FP16 versus FP32.

Q: What is the power consumption of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a 300 W power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W and has no power connectors, as it is an integrated processor.

Q: When was each product released?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 was released on 2023-08-02. The Intel Arc Pro B390 was released on 2026-01-26.

Q: Does the database contain benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B390?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no benchmark entries and no average score. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has an average benchmark score of 87,108 and sits at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every specification category.

Process node: The AMD card uses a 6 nm TSMC process. The Intel card uses a 3 nm Intel process.

Transistors: The AMD Navi 33 chip contains 13,300 million transistors. The Intel Panther Lake chip has an unknown transistor count.

Die size: The AMD chip measures 204 mm². The Intel chip has an unknown die size.

Clocks: The AMD base clock is 1720 MHz with a 2440 MHz boost. The Intel base clock is 300 MHz with a 2500 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz for AMD and system shared for Intel.

Memory: The AMD card has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Compute units: AMD has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. Intel has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 RT cores.

Pixel and texture rates: AMD delivers 156.2 GPixel/s and 312.3 GTexel/s. Intel delivers 60.00 GPixel/s and 120.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 and FP16: AMD delivers 19.99 TFLOPS and 39.98 TFLOPS respectively. Intel delivers 7.680 TFLOPS and 15.36 TFLOPS.

TDP: AMD is 130 W. Intel is 80 W.

Form factor: AMD is a single-slot discrete card with a 1x 6-pin connector and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Intel is an IGP with no connectors and an IGP bus interface.

Display outputs: AMD has 4x DisplayPort 2.1. Intel has portable device dependent outputs.

Dimensions: AMD measures 241 mm by 115 mm. Intel has no recorded dimensions.

Release date: AMD launched 2023-08-02. Intel launched 2026-01-26.

Launch MSRP: AMD launched at 599 USD. Intel has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins on raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 19.99 TFLOPS is more than 2.5 times the Intel part's 7.680 TFLOPS. The FP16 gap is similar, with AMD delivering 39.98 TFLOPS versus Intel's 15.36 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 156.2 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 312.3 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s reinforce this advantage.

The Radeon PRO W7600 also wins on memory. The dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 pool with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides consistent performance regardless of host system. The Intel Arc Pro B390 depends entirely on system shared memory, making its bandwidth variable and system dependent.

The AMD card has more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and ray tracing cores. It also has a higher transistor count on a larger die. The 93rd percentile ranking versus the 50th percentile ranking reflects the AMD card's stronger recorded position in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 80 W TDP is substantially lower than the 130 W TDP of the AMD card. As an integrated processor, it requires no power connectors and consumes no additional slot space. The 3 nm process node is more advanced than the 6 nm node used by AMD.

The Intel part also wins on boost clock. Its 2500 MHz boost exceeds the AMD card's 2440 MHz boost. However, the base clock of 300 MHz is far below AMD's 1720 MHz, indicating the Intel part relies on aggressive boosting to reach its peak.

For systems where discrete graphics is not an option, the Intel Arc Pro B390 provides ray tracing capability with 12 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The AMD card offers 32 RT cores for the same API feature set.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 delivers roughly 2.6 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel Arc Pro B390, with proportional advantages in pixel rate, texture rate, and memory bandwidth. Its dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth removes the variability of system shared memory. The recorded average benchmark score of 87,108 and 93rd percentile ranking place it among capable workstation GPUs, within 5% of the NVIDIA RTX A4500.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 targets a different use case entirely. As an integrated graphics processor with 80 W TDP, no power connectors, and portable device dependent display outputs, it suits compact and mobile systems. Its 3 nm process and 2500 MHz boost clock show architectural efficiency, but the compute resources are limited: 1,536 shading units, 24 ROPs, and 7.680 TFLOPS FP32. The lack of any benchmark entries makes its real-world performance unverified in this database.

Buyers needing a discrete workstation card for demanding graphics workloads should choose the AMD Radeon PRO W7600. It has the compute capacity, memory bandwidth, and display outputs for professional use. The single-slot design and 130 W TDP make it practical for workstation builds, and the 599 USD launch MSRP applies to the AMD product.

Buyers needing integrated graphics with modern API support should consider the Intel Arc Pro B390. It provides DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support with ray tracing capability in a power-efficient package. The absence of benchmark data means its performance claims remain unverified, but its specifications indicate a capable integrated solution for systems where discrete graphics is impractical.