AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Intel Arc G3 Extreme Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark scores for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600, while the Intel Arc G3 Extreme has no benchmark entries. The AMD part achieves an average benchmark score of 87108 across its two recorded tests: 81528 in Geekbench OpenCL and 92688 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme has an average benchmark score of 0, with no individual test results available. This absence of data means no direct head-to-head comparison can be constructed from the database at this time.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 sits at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in aggregate score are the NVIDIA RTX A4500 at 91671, the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile at 91134, the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 at 87445, and the NVIDIA CMP 40HX at 85637. Against the Quadro GP100, the W7600 trails by 0.4 percent, a margin small enough to be considered statistically equivalent. Against the CMP 40HX, the W7600 leads by 1.7 percent. The gap widens against the RTX A4500 Mobile, where the W7600 is 4.4 percent behind, and against the RTX A4500, where it is 5 percent behind.

The Intel Arc G3 Extreme, by contrast, is placed at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with no nearest rivals listed. The database contains no scores that would allow a performance delta calculation between the two cards. The W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc G3 Extreme delivers 7.680 TFLOPS. This is a 2.6 times difference in raw shader throughput. The W7600 also produces a pixel rate of 156.2 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part, and a texture rate of 312.3 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s.

The absence of benchmark entries for the Intel Arc G3 Extreme is itself a notable data point. The database records no OpenCL, Vulkan, or any other workload result for this part. Its percentile ranking of 50 appears to be a default placement rather than a measured outcome, since the average score of 0 cannot support a percentile calculation of that level. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 81528 and 92688 as its two recorded scores, which produce the 87108 average and place it firmly in the upper tier of the database.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The W7600 has an average score of 87108. It is 0.4 percent behind the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 (87445), 4.4 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile (91134), and 5 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 (91671). It is 1.7 percent ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX (85637).

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 Extreme have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Intel Arc G3 Extreme, with an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile placement of 50 is not supported by any measured workload results.

Q: What are the peak FP32 compute figures for both cards?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme delivers 7.680 TFLOPS. The AMD part is roughly 2.6 times higher in this metric.

Q: Which card has the higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme is at the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme uses system shared memory, with a system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W and uses a single 6-pin power connector. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme has a TDP of 80 W and uses no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The architecture is RDNA 3.0 under the codename "Hotpink Bonefish," and it belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The transistor density is 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc G3 Extreme uses the Panther Lake chip built on Intel's 3 nm process. The architecture is Xe3-LPG, and the generation is Arc Graphics-M. The database records the transistor count and die size as unknown, with no transistor density figure available.

The compute resource allocation differs substantially. The AMD part carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part carries 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 24 render output units, and 12 ray tracing cores. In every compute category except shading units, the AMD part has more than double the resources of the Intel part. The shading unit count is 2048 versus 1536, a 33 percent advantage for AMD.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The W7600 has dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 128 bit bus and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc G3 Extreme uses system shared memory, with the bus width listed as system shared and bandwidth listed as system dependent. This makes the Intel part dependent on platform memory performance, while the AMD card has fixed, self-contained memory resources.

The W7600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and is a single-slot card. The Arc G3 Extreme is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP bus interface, meaning it has no discrete slot footprint. The AMD card measures 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions, consistent with its integrated nature.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The display outputs differ: the W7600 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Arc G3 Extreme lists "Portable Device Dependent" outputs, reflecting its mobile integrated positioning.

Specification Differences

The process node differs: the W7600 uses 6 nm, the Arc G3 Extreme uses 3 nm. The foundry differs: TSMC for AMD, Intel for the Intel part. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The AMD memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel memory clock is listed as system shared.

The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128 bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card uses system shared memory, with a system dependent bandwidth. The W7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The Arc G3 Extreme has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 RT cores.

Pixel rate is 156.2 GPixel/s for the W7600 and 60.00 GPixel/s for the Arc G3 Extreme. Texture rate is 312.3 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 19.99 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 39.98 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio.

TDP is 130 W for the W7600 and 80 W for the Arc G3 Extreme. The W7600 is single-slot with a 1x 6-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The Arc G3 Extreme is an IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU listed. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and IGP for Intel.

The W7600 has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The Arc G3 Extreme has no launch MSRP recorded. The W7600 was released on 2023-08-02, and the Arc G3 Extreme on 2026-05-31. The W7600 lists the Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor; the Arc G3 Extreme has no predecessor recorded.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the only one of the two parts with measured performance data in the database. Its average score of 87108 places it at the 93rd percentile, with a performance profile that sits within 5 percent of the NVIDIA RTX A4500 and RTX A4500 Mobile, and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX. For workloads that rely on FP32 compute, the W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS, which is 2.6 times the 7.680 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc G3 Extreme.

The Intel Arc G3 Extreme has no benchmark entries and no nearest rivals in the database. Its 50th percentile placement cannot be validated from measured scores. The hardware specifications show a lower resource allocation across shading units, texture units, render output units, and ray tracing cores. Its 80 W TDP and integrated design suggest a different use case, but the database lacks the workload data to support any performance claims.

The W7600 also holds the advantage in memory resources. Dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed, measurable capability, whereas the Arc G3 Extreme's system shared memory bandwidth is system dependent and therefore variable. The W7600 supports 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent.

The data supports the W7600 for users who need a discrete, single-slot card with dedicated memory, a 130 W TDP, and a 93rd percentile standing among all GPUs. The Arc G3 Extreme is an integrated part with a 3 nm process, 80 W TDP, and no measured scores, so no performance ranking can be assigned from the database.

The W7600 was released in 2023 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The Arc G3 Extreme is scheduled for release in 2026. Both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The architectural differences are clear from the recorded specifications, but the performance delta can only be stated for the AMD side, since the Intel part has no benchmark data in the database.