AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains direct benchmark results for the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 but no recorded scores for the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU. The W7600 posts an average benchmark score of 87,108 across its two recorded tests. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 81,528 and its Vulkan score is 92,688. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no benchmark entries, so a direct numerical comparison cannot be made from recorded measurements.

The Radeon PRO W7600 sits at the 93rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, averages 87,445, which is 0.4% higher than the W7600's average. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX trails by 1.7% with an average score of 85,637. Two other rivals lead by larger margins: the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile averages 91,134 (4.4% ahead) and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 averages 91,671 (5.0% ahead). These deltas place the W7600 in a competitive mid-range workstation position, slightly behind the top A4500 variants but ahead of the CMP 40HX.

For the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, the absence of benchmark data means no percentile ranking beyond its 50th percentile placeholder and no rival comparisons are available. The data indicates this part is not yet measured in the database, or its target application does not produce comparable compute workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon PRO W7600 dominates in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance is 19.99 TFLOPS versus 4.147 TFLOPS for the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, a difference of roughly 4.8 times. FP16 performance follows the same pattern: 39.98 TFLOPS versus 8.294 TFLOPS. Texture rate stands at 312.3 GTexel/s against 129.6 GTexel/s, and pixel rate is 156.2 GPixel/s versus 86.40 GPixel/s. These figures indicate the W7600 is built for sustained professional rendering and compute tasks, while the Z2 Go GPU is oriented toward lower-power integrated graphics duties.

Memory bandwidth heavily favors the W7600. It uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on the same 128-bit bus width but achieves only 102.4 GB/s. The W7600's bandwidth is 2.8 times higher, which matters for texture-heavy workloads and large data transfers. However, the Z2 Go GPU offers twice the capacity at 16 GB, which benefits workloads that require larger working sets but tolerate lower bandwidth.

The Z2 Go GPU wins on power efficiency. Its TDP is 28 W, compared to 130 W for the W7600. That is a 102 W difference in thermal design power. The Z2 Go also requires no power connectors, while the W7600 uses a single 6-pin connector. The Z2 Go's compact design with a single USB Type-C display output suggests it targets low-power embedded or handheld gaming systems, whereas the W7600's four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and single-slot profile target professional multi-display workstations.

In terms of shading resources, the W7600 has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Z2 Go GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. The W7600 provides 2.7 times more shading units, 2.7 times more TMUs, twice the ROPs, and 2.7 times more RT cores. These ratios align with the compute throughput differences and reinforce that the W7600 is the stronger performer in every measured compute category.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations. The Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the Rembrandt+ chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture and is classified under Console GPU (AMD). This generational gap explains the feature and efficiency differences.

Both chips are built on the same 6 nm process node at TSMC. Transistor counts are nearly identical: 13,300 million for the W7600 and 13,100 million for the Z2 Go GPU. Die size differs slightly, with the W7600 at 204 mm² versus 208 mm² for the Z2 Go. Transistor density is 65.2 million per mm² for the W7600 and 63.0 million per mm² for the Z2 Go. The close transistor counts suggest similar manufacturing complexity, but the architectural differences allocate those transistors differently.

Clock speeds show a notable contrast. The W7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2440 MHz. The Z2 Go GPU has a much lower base clock of 800 MHz but a higher boost clock of 2700 MHz. The Z2 Go's 300 MHz boost advantage over the W7600 does not compensate for its significantly lower shader count and narrower memory bandwidth. The memory clock also differs: the W7600 runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Z2 Go runs at 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has tensor cores, which means neither is optimized for AI acceleration beyond standard shader-based compute. The W7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Z2 Go has no recorded bus interface, consistent with its integrated or embedded positioning.

The W7600 was released on 2023-08-02 and remains in active production. The Z2 Go GPU was released on 2024-12-31 and is also in active production. The W7600's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Z2 Go has no recorded predecessor. The W7600 has a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Radeon PRO W7600 delivers 19.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.98 TFLOPS FP16, versus 4.147 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.294 TFLOPS FP16 for the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The W7600 uses 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 128-bit bus. The Z2 Go uses 16 GB LPDDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth on the same 128-bit bus. The W7600 has 2.8 times the bandwidth, while the Z2 Go has twice the capacity.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The W7600 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a single 6-pin power connector plus a 300 W suggested PSU. The Z2 Go has a TDP of 28 W and requires no power connectors.

Q: Are both GPUs based on the same process node?

A: Yes, both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The W7600 uses 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, and the Z2 Go uses 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die.

Q: Which GPU has more rendering resources?

A: The W7600 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The Z2 Go has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 RT cores.

Q: How does the W7600 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The W7600's average score of 87,108 is 0.4% below the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, 1.7% above the NVIDIA CMP 40HX, 4.4% below the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile, and 5.0% below the NVIDIA RTX A4500.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU |

|---------------|----------------------|---------------------|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |

| Chip | Navi 33 | Rembrandt+ |

| Codename | Hotpink Bonefish | None |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 13,100 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 208 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 63.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1720 MHz | 800 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz | 2700 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 800 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 768 |

| TMUs | 128 | 48 |

| ROPs | 64 | 32 |

| RT Cores | 32 | 12 |

| Pixel Rate | 156.2 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 312.3 GTexel/s | 129.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 19.99 TFLOPS | 4.147 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 130 W | 28 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | None |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | None |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x USB Type-C |

| Dimensions | 241 mm length, 115 mm height | None recorded |

| Release Date | 2023-08-02 | 2024-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | None |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 87,108 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 93 | 50 |

Both GPUs share the same 6 nm process node, TSMC foundry, 128-bit memory bus width, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, OpenGL 4.6 support, Vulkan 1.4 support, lack of tensor cores, and active production status. The W7600's game clock is not recorded for either part.