AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy very different positions in the recorded database. The W7500 is a fully documented professional GPU with a complete benchmark profile, while the LX PRO is listed with no benchmark scores at all, so the comparison relies entirely on the specification data and the W7500’s measured results against its nearest rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards. The W7500 has a full set of recorded scores, while the LX PRO has an empty benchmark array. This makes a direct performance comparison impossible from measured data alone. What the database does provide is the W7500’s average benchmark score of 16415, which places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs tracked in the database.

Looking at the W7500’s individual results, the strongest showing comes from Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 68634, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 58213. The Passmark G3D score of 13368 and the Passmark GPU Compute score of 5910 round out the major compute-oriented measurements. The older DirectX tests show lower scores, with Passmark DirectX 9 at 200, DirectX 11 at 125, DirectX 10 at 65, and DirectX 12 at 46. The 2D score is 1174.

The nearest rivals list for the W7500 provides useful context. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell sits at an average score of 16408, which is effectively identical with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is at 16361, a 0.3 percent delta. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is at 16351, a 0.4 percent delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is at 16504, which is 0.5 percent higher than the W7500’s average. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the W7500’s average score is tightly clustered with these four other cards. The data shows a near-dead heat between the W7500 and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, with the W7500 trailing the RTX 5090 D V2 by just half a percent.

Because the LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks, its percentile ranking is listed at 50 with an average score of zero. That percentile value appears in the database, but without any actual test results, it cannot be interpreted as a measured performance level. The W7500, by contrast, has a percentile of 59, meaning its average score sits above the median of all GPUs in the database.

The absence of LX PRO benchmark data means no wins can be assigned to either card in the head-to-head table. The wins counter shows zero for both. The practical takeaway from the recorded data is that the W7500 has validated, repeatable scores across nine different tests, while the LX PRO has no measured results to compare against. Any statement about the LX PRO’s real-world speed would be speculation, which the database does not support.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different GPU architectures. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses an architecture labeled TrueGPU with the 7G105 chip and belongs to the 7G100 generation. No codename is recorded for the LX PRO.

Both chips are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The W7500’s die size is 204 mm² with 13,300 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The LX PRO’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no density figure exists for it.

The compute resource allocation differs substantially. The W7500 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are listed. The LX PRO’s shading unit count is more than triple that of the W7500, and its TMU and ROP counts are also higher. The W7500 includes dedicated ray tracing hardware, which the LX PRO does not appear to have based on the recorded data.

Memory configurations also diverge. The W7500 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with a memory clock of 2000 MHz and 16 Gbps effective data rate, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with a memory clock of 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective data rate, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO has three times the memory capacity and substantially higher bandwidth.

The FP32 compute throughput is listed at 12.19 TFLOPS for the W7500 and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. The FP16 figures are 24.37 TFLOPS for the W7500 and 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX PRO, both expressed with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 108.8 GPixel/s for the W7500 versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. The texture rate is 190.4 GTexel/s for the W7500 versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO. In every raw throughput metric recorded, the LX PRO is roughly double the W7500 or better.

Power characteristics are markedly different. The W7500 has a TDP of 70 W, while the LX PRO is listed at 225 W. The W7500 requires no power connectors and suggests a 250 W PSU. The LX PRO uses a single 16-pin connector and suggests a 550 W PSU. The W7500 is a single-slot card, while the LX PRO is dual-slot. The cards also have different physical dimensions, with the W7500 at 216 mm length, 115 mm height, and 20 mm width, while the LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide.

The bus interface differs as well. The W7500 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are both four ports, but the W7500 has four DisplayPort 2.1 connectors while the LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. API support is close, with both listing DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Vulkan support is 1.4 for the W7500 and 1.3 for the LX PRO.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is the only one of the two cards with any measured performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 16415 and its placement at the 59th percentile among all GPUs give it a concrete, verifiable position. The nearest rival data shows that the W7500 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at a 0 percent delta, slightly ahead of the RX 5700 XT and Radeon Pro 5600M by 0.3 and 0.4 percent respectively, and slightly behind the RTX 5090 D V2 by 0.5 percent. This clustering indicates the W7500 delivers performance in line with those four established cards.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores, no average score, no nearest rivals, and a percentile of 50 that is not backed by any measured results. Its specifications show higher raw throughput numbers, more memory, and more compute units, but the database contains no evidence of how those specifications translate into actual test performance. The W7500 is an active product with a release date recorded as 2023-08-02 and a launch MSRP of 429 USD. The LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16 and no launch MSRP listed.

For a buyer seeking a card with documented performance data, the W7500 is the only choice supported by measurements. For a buyer who needs the larger 24 GB memory capacity or the higher FP32 throughput listed in the LX PRO’s specifications, the database cannot confirm whether those specifications produce real-world results. The data shows the W7500 is a proven performer in the 59th percentile range, while the LX PRO remains an unverified entry with no recorded test outcomes.

The power requirements also favor the W7500 for constrained environments. Its 70 W TDP, no power connectors, and 250 W suggested PSU contrast with the LX PRO’s 225 W TDP, single 16-pin connector, and 550 W suggested PSU. The W7500’s single-slot form factor is also more compact than the LX PRO’s dual-slot design. These factors are documented and can be compared directly, unlike the missing performance data.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards in the database:

| Field | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Codename | Hotpink Bonefish | None |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | 7G100 |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 204 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 65.2M / mm² | None |

| Base clock | 1500 MHz | None |

| Boost clock | 1700 MHz | None |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1792 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 112 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT cores | 28 | None |

| Pixel rate | 108.8 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 190.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 70 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 216 mm, 8.5 inches | 248 mm, 9.8 inches |

| Height | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | 118 mm, 4.6 inches |

| Width | 20 mm, 0.8 inches | 48 mm, 1.9 inches |

| Release date | 2023-08-02 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 429 USD | None |

Both cards share the 6 nm TSMC process, GDDR6 memory type, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, four display outputs, and Active production status. The W7500 has no predecessor listed beyond Radeon Pro Vega, and no successor for either card is recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has an average benchmark score of 16415. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmark results are recorded in the database.

Q: How does the W7500 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The W7500’s average score of 16415 is within 0.5 percent of four cards. It ties the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16408 with a 0 percent delta, is 0.3 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361, 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16351, and 0.5 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 at 16504.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The W7500 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO’s memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the W7500’s is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the LX PRO have ray tracing cores?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the LX PRO. The W7500 has 28 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The W7500 has a TDP of 70 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W with one 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The LX PRO is listed at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, double the W7500’s 12.19 TFLOPS. The FP16 figures follow the same pattern, with the LX PRO at 49.15 TFLOPS and the W7500 at 24.37 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio.