AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a comparison between two active products from different segments: a professional workstation card and a mobile enthusiast GPU. The database records show a clear overall winner in raw performance, but the Radeon PRO W7500 holds a specific advantage in one measurable area. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 16415, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA part averages 35435, sitting at the 80th percentile. Across nine head-to-head tests, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins eight, with the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 taking one.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates the compute and graphics test suite. In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA part scores 143870 against the AMD part’s 58213, a delta of negative 59.5 percent, meaning the AMD card trails by nearly three-fifths. The Geekbench Vulkan result follows the same pattern: NVIDIA scores 139213, AMD scores 68634, and the delta is negative 50.7 percent. These two tests alone show that the mobile NVIDIA chip delivers more than double the performance in both OpenCL and Vulkan workloads.

The Passmark DirectX tests reinforce this gap. In DirectX 10, NVIDIA scores 151 against AMD’s 65, a negative 57 percent delta. DirectX 11 shows NVIDIA at 237 versus AMD at 125, a negative 47.3 percent delta. The DirectX 12 test has NVIDIA at 102 and AMD at 46, a negative 54.9 percent delta. Even the older DirectX 9 test, where the gap is smallest, favors NVIDIA: 259 versus 200, a negative 22.8 percent delta. The Passmark G3D score, which is a general indicator of 3D rendering capability, shows NVIDIA at 24004 and AMD at 13368, a negative 44.3 percent delta.

Compute performance, as measured by Passmark GPU Compute, also goes to NVIDIA. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 10101, while the Radeon PRO W7500 scores 5910, a negative 41.5 percent delta. The single win for AMD comes in the Passmark G2D test, which measures 2D graphics performance. Here the Radeon PRO W7500 scores 1174 against NVIDIA’s 981, a positive delta of 19.7 percent for AMD. This is a meaningful lead in 2D throughput, and it is the only benchmark in the recorded data where the AMD card is ahead.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. It packs 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, for a density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip has more than twice the transistor count on a die that is only about 29 percent larger, and the density difference reflects the newer process and design.

Memory configuration differs substantially. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is more than double the memory bandwidth for the NVIDIA chip. Clock behavior also differs: the AMD card has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost of 1700 MHz, while the NVIDIA part runs a much lower base of 847 MHz and boost of 1447 MHz. The memory clocks reflect the different memory types, with AMD at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and NVIDIA at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Core counts heavily favor NVIDIA. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. The Radeon PRO W7500 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA chip also produces higher throughput numbers: 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 versus 12.19 TFLOPS for AMD, and 17.04 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio) versus 24.37 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio) for AMD. The pixel rate is 115.8 GPixel/s for NVIDIA versus 108.8 GPixel/s for AMD, and the texture rate is 266.2 GTexel/s versus 190.4 GTexel/s.

The bus interface differs as well. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the NVIDIA part uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Power consumption figures from the database show the AMD card at 70 W TDP and the NVIDIA part at 60 W TDP, with the AMD card being a single-slot design and the NVIDIA part being an integrated graphics processor (IGP) for mobile use. The AMD card has four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the NVIDIA part’s display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every compute-heavy and 3D graphics workload recorded. The OpenCL and Vulkan scores show a large lead for NVIDIA, which indicates strong general-purpose GPU compute and graphics API performance. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 tests all favor NVIDIA, with deltas ranging from negative 47.3 to negative 57 percent. The G3D score, which is a broad 3D performance indicator, shows NVIDIA ahead by 44.3 percent. The GPU compute test also goes to NVIDIA, with a 41.5 percent lead. For any workload involving 3D rendering, ray tracing, or general compute, the data clearly points to the NVIDIA part.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins in exactly one recorded benchmark: Passmark G2D. This is a 2D graphics test, and the AMD card leads by 19.7 percent. This advantage is notable for applications that rely heavily on 2D desktop rendering or 2D display output. The AMD card also has a lower TDP at 70 W compared to the NVIDIA part’s 60 W, though this difference is minor. The AMD card’s four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs provide a fixed set of display connections, which may be relevant for multi-monitor professional setups, while the NVIDIA part’s outputs depend on the portable device implementation.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an average benchmark score of 35435, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has an average of 16415. The NVIDIA part also sits at the 80th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the 59th percentile for the AMD part.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two cards?

A: The largest delta is in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where the NVIDIA part leads by 59.5 percent. The AMD card scores 58213 and the NVIDIA part scores 143870 in that test.

Q: Does the AMD card win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins the Passmark G2D test, scoring 1174 against the NVIDIA part’s 981, a lead of 19.7 percent.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power ratings for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 1792 shading units.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the superior choice for almost all measured performance categories. It wins eight of nine head-to-head benchmarks, with particularly large leads in OpenCL, Vulkan, and DirectX tests. The NVIDIA part also has more memory, a wider memory bus, higher bandwidth, more shading units, more ray tracing cores, and tensor cores that the AMD part lacks entirely. The average score difference is substantial: 35435 versus 16415, a factor of more than two. Users who need maximum compute, 3D rendering, or modern graphics API performance should select the NVIDIA part based on this data alone.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 does have a clear niche. It wins the Passmark G2D test by 19.7 percent, which indicates a 2D graphics advantage. It also has a fixed set of four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which is a defined display configuration for professional workstations. The AMD card’s transistor density is lower and its die is smaller, but it uses less die area for its 8 GB frame buffer. For tasks that prioritize 2D throughput or require a known multi-display output arrangement, the AMD card has a measurable edge. For everything else, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the stronger performer according to the benchmark database.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ on nearly every specification field recorded. The process node is 6 nm for AMD and 5 nm for NVIDIA. Transistor count is 13,300 million for AMD versus 31,100 million for NVIDIA. Die size is 204 mm² for AMD versus 263 mm² for NVIDIA, and transistor density is 65.2 million per mm² versus 118.3 million per mm². Base clock is 1500 MHz for AMD and 847 MHz for NVIDIA, while boost clock is 1700 MHz for AMD and 1447 MHz for NVIDIA. Memory size is 8 GB GDDR6 for AMD versus 12 GB GDDR7 for NVIDIA, with bus widths of 128-bit and 192-bit, and bandwidths of 256.0 GB/s and 672.0 GB/s.

Shading units are 1792 for AMD and 5888 for NVIDIA. Texture mapping units are 112 versus 184, and raster output units are 64 versus 80. Ray tracing cores are 28 for AMD and 46 for NVIDIA, and tensor cores are listed as null for AMD and 184 for NVIDIA. Pixel rate is 108.8 GPixel/s for AMD versus 115.8 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 190.4 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 12.19 TFLOPS for AMD and 17.04 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 throughput is 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) for AMD and 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA. TDP is 70 W for AMD and 60 W for NVIDIA. Slot width is single-slot for AMD and IGP for NVIDIA. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are four DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD and portable device dependent for NVIDIA. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 429 USD, while the NVIDIA part has no recorded launch MSRP.