GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7500

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1700 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A380

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 75 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
58,213
38,224
geekbench_vulkan
68,634
36,736
passmark_directx_10
65
37
passmark_directx_11
125
38
passmark_directx_12
46
35
passmark_directx_9
200
73
passmark_g2d
1,174
610
passmark_g3d
13,368
6,252
passmark_gpu_compute
5,910
2,762
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
808

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Arc A380

Reviewing the test results for AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU and Intel's Arc A380 graphics, an obvious trend emerges. AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU consistently provides better frame rates in every testing. This rendering lead ranges from noticeable to impressive based on the particular title. This reliability attests to inherent design advantages. Consumers prioritizing visual capability might factor this in.

Intel's Arc A380 graphics has difficulty to rival AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU's raw throughput. In cost-sensitive consumers, Intel's Arc A380 graphics can still offer reasonable results, however buyers demanding top-tier results will look toward AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU. The benchmark difference is significantly notable to overlook. Heavy scenarios specifically showcase this disparity. The cost difference delivers dividends in visual quality.

The video memory superiority of AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU becomes particularly important at elevated resolutions. High resolution rendering needs significant memory, and AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU provides more headroom. This results into improved frame rates in VRAM-hungry scenarios. Upcoming software should progressively need greater video memory. This benefit widens over time.

The bottom line: AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU claims this battle convincingly. Buyers prioritizing gaming throughput should strongly choose AMD AMD Radeon PRO W7500 GPU over Intel's Arc A380 graphics. This performance numbers supports this recommendation. Your titles can run noticeably better. It's a clear champion in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7500
A380
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
1,024 -42.9%
Shaders
1,792
1,024 -42.9%
TMUs
112
64 -42.9%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
28
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
2050 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
6,144 -25.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
96 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
186.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
65.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
12.19 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
380.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
24.37 TFLOPS (2:1)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
8 -71.4%
XMX Cores
128
Matrix Cores
56
Power
TDP
70 W
75 W
TDP (W)
70
75 +7.1%
Suggested PSU
250 W
250 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 33
DG2-128
Codename
Hotpink Bonefish
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Process Size
6 nm
6 nm
Transistors
13,300 million
7,200 million
Die Size
204 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
65.2M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Dual-slot
Length
216 mm 8.5 inches
222 mm 8.7 inches
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
114 mm 4.5 inches
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
429 USD
149 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Xe Graphics
Successor
Battlemage
View Radeon PRO W7500 Details View Arc A380 Details