AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600S Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 share the same underlying silicon—both use the Navi 33 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die—yet they are positioned for entirely different workloads. The RX 7600S is a mobile part from the Radeon RX 7000 series, while the PRO W7500 is a desktop workstation card from the Radeon Pro Navi series. Benchmark data reveals a clear performance hierarchy: the RX 7600S wins 8 of 9 head-to-head tests, but the PRO W7500 counters with a substantial lead in 2D graphics throughput. The following analysis breaks down where each card excels, based solely on the provided specifications and benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S posts an average benchmark score of 16,696, compared to the AMD Radeon PRO W7500's 16,415. That is a difference of roughly 1.7% in favor of the mobile card.

Q: How do their percentile rankings compare?

A: The RX 7600S ranks in the 60th percentile of all GPUs, while the PRO W7500 sits at the 59th percentile. Both are essentially mid-pack performers, with the RX 7600S holding a marginal edge.

Q: What is the largest single-benchmark victory for either card?

A: The RX 7600S wins Passmark DirectX 12 by 41.3% (65 vs 46). The PRO W7500's biggest win is Passmark G2D, where it leads by 33.9% (1174 vs 776).

Q: Do both cards use the same memory configuration?

A: Yes. Both feature 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The RX 7600S boosts to 2200 MHz, while the PRO W7500 boosts to 1700 MHz. The RX 7600S also has a game clock of 1865 MHz; the PRO W7500 does not list a game clock.

Q: Are there differences in their API support?

A: No. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs are built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. Transistor count (13,300 million), die size (204 mm²), and transistor density (65.2M / mm²) are identical. The shading unit count (1792), texture mapping units (112), render output units (64), and ray tracing cores (28) are also the same.

The key architectural difference lies in clock behavior. The RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. The PRO W7500 matches the base clock at 1500 MHz but boost to only 1700 MHz, with no game clock specified. This 500 MHz boost delta directly translates into different compute rates.

The memory subsystem is identical: 8 GB GDDR6, 128-bit bus, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 2000 MHz memory clock (16 Gbps effective). Both cards support the same API set—DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4—and neither has tensor cores.

Physical design differs significantly. The RX 7600S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The PRO W7500 is a single-slot card measuring 216 mm (8.5 inches) in length, 115 mm (4.5 inches) in height, and 20 mm (0.8 inches) in width, with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. Both draw power without external connectors, but the RX 7600S has a 75 W TDP versus the PRO W7500's 70 W TDP.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600S dominates the compute-oriented and 3D rendering benchmarks. It wins every DirectX test (9, 10, 11, 12), both Geekbench compute tests (OpenCL and Vulkan), Passmark G3D, and Passmark GPU Compute. Its largest margins come in DirectX 12 (41.3% ahead), OpenCL (16.8% ahead), and G3D (15.3% ahead). This makes it the clear choice for gaming workloads, ray tracing scenarios, and general GPU compute tasks that leverage these APIs.

The PRO W7500 wins one benchmark decisively: Passmark G2D, where it scores 1174 versus 776, a 33.9% advantage. This 2D graphics throughput metric indicates stronger performance in desktop compositing, 2D CAD applications, and other raster-based workstation tasks. Its single-slot form factor and four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs also make it more suitable for multi-display professional setups, though the data does not quantify that advantage.

For users prioritizing raw computational throughput, the RX 7600S is superior in every measured 3D and compute category. For those whose primary workload is 2D graphics rendering or who need a compact, low-profile workstation card with display flexibility, the PRO W7500's G2D lead and form factor are the deciding factors.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600S | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Series | Radeon RX 7000 series | None |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 1700 MHz |

| Game Clock | 1865 MHz | None |

| Pixel Rate | 140.8 GPixel/s | 108.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 246.4 GTexel/s | 190.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Compute | 15.77 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) | 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 70 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Suggested PSU | None | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Dimensions | Not specified | 216 mm x 115 mm x 20 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2023-08-02 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega |

| Launch MSRP | None | 429 USD |

Both cards share identical memory (8 GB GDDR6, 128-bit, 256.0 GB/s), base clock (1500 MHz), memory clock (2000 MHz / 16 Gbps effective), shading units (1792), TMUs (112), ROPs (64), RT cores (28), and process node (6 nm TSMC).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RX 7600S sweeps the 3D and compute categories. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 68,012 against 58,213 for the PRO W7500—a 16.8% advantage. Geekbench Vulkan shows a narrower gap: 73,868 versus 68,634, a 7.6% lead. These results indicate that the RX 7600S's higher boost clock (2200 MHz vs 1700 MHz) translates into tangible compute performance across both major GPU APIs.

The DirectX suite shows the most dramatic differences. Passmark DirectX 12 yields 65 for the RX 7600S versus 46 for the PRO W7500—a 41.3% margin, the largest of any test. DirectX 11 follows with 140 versus 125 (12% ahead), DirectX 10 with 74 versus 65 (13.8% ahead), and DirectX 9 with 211 versus 200 (5.5% ahead). The RX 7600S's lead grows with newer DirectX versions, suggesting its architecture is better optimized for modern rendering paths.

In Passmark G3D, the RX 7600S scores 15,408 versus 13,368, a 15.3% advantage. GPU Compute shows 6,520 versus 5,910, a 10.3% lead. These two tests represent overall 3D graphics capability and general-purpose compute, respectively, and both confirm the RX 7600S as the faster card for demanding workloads.

The PRO W7500's sole victory is Passmark G2D, where it scores 1,174 versus 776. The 33.9% margin is significant and indicates a fundamentally different strength profile. While the RX 7600S excels at 3D rasterization and compute, the PRO W7500's 2D performance suggests better optimization for desktop, UI, and 2D content creation tasks.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 7600S is the faster GPU in nearly every measurable category. It leads in average benchmark score (16,696 vs 16,415), wins 8 of 9 head-to-head tests, and holds a 60th percentile ranking versus the PRO W7500's 59th. Its advantages in DirectX 12 (41.3%), OpenCL (16.8%), and G3D (15.3%) are substantial and consistent across API generations.

However, the PRO W7500 is not without merit. Its 33.9% lead in Passmark G2D is the single largest margin in any test for either card, indicating that 2D graphics workloads are its clear strength. It also offers a single-slot form factor, four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, and a 250 W suggested PSU, making it a more practical choice for professional workstation builds that require compactness and multi-display support. Its 70 W TDP is slightly lower than the RX 7600S's 75 W, and it was released seven months later (2023-08-02 vs 2023-01-03).

For gamers, 3D artists, or compute developers, the RX 7600S is the obvious pick—it wins every 3D and compute benchmark by margins ranging from 5.5% to 41.3%. For professionals whose workflows are dominated by 2D rendering, desktop compositing, or who need a low-profile single-slot card with DisplayPort 2.1 connectivity, the PRO W7500's G2D dominance and physical design make it the better fit. The RX 7600S is the performance champion, but the PRO W7500 wins the niche it was designed for.