GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO V710

CORE STATE Navi 32
VRAM 28 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 158 W
BUS WIDTH 224 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
853
1,345
geekbench_opencl
116,460
67,695
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
69,089

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Analyzing the test results for GeForce NVIDIA RTX A2000 and Radeon AMD Radeon PRO V710, the pattern of close throughput develops. None of the card leads repeatedly throughout every benchmarks. This back-and-forth of victories means core balance. Users encounter a true decision here. Either cards offer solid rendering capability.

Over obsessing on minor frame rate differences, prospective users can examine additional elements. TDP, noise levels, build quality, and warranty quality frequently are important more than slight FPS gaps. Such variables might influence the decision. Evaluate further than merely benchmarks. The complete offering matters.

If gaming capability is so comparable, MSRP and functionality turn the key factors. Look at hardware RT quality, AI upscaling implementation, power consumption, and platform maturity when selecting between GeForce NVIDIA RTX A2000 and Radeon AMD Radeon PRO V710. Such considerations could influence the balance. Think broadly. This larger view counts.

To summarize, the matchup between GeForce NVIDIA RTX A2000 and Radeon AMD Radeon PRO V710 finishes in a effective deadlock. Performance deltas are minor and unlikely to influence actual experience. Direct your choice on value, ecosystem preferences, and individual functionality preferences. Either are solid picks. The parity is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO V710
RTX A2000
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,456
3,328 -3.7%
Shaders
3,456
3,328 -3.7%
TMUs
216
104 -51.9%
ROPs
96
48 -50.0%
Compute Units
54
SM Count
26
Clocks
Base Clock
1900 MHz
562 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
28 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
28,672
6,144 -78.6%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
224 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
504.0 GB/s
288.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB
L3 Cache
54 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
57.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
27.65 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
864.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
55.30 TFLOPS (2:1)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
54
26 -51.9%
Tensor Cores
104
Power
TDP
158 W
70 W
TDP (W)
158
70 -55.7%
Suggested PSU
450 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 32
GA106
Codename
Wheat Nas
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
28,100 million
12,000 million
Die Size
346 mm²
276 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
81.2M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Dual-slot
Length
167 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon PRO V710 Details View RTX A2000 Details