AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO V710 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER occupy distinctly different positions in the database. The recorded measurements show a single head-to-head benchmark, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the NVIDIA part delivers a score of 2690 against 853 for the AMD card, a difference of 68.3 percent in favor of the GeForce. That single data point drives the entire comparison, but the surrounding specifications and the percentile rankings reveal a more layered story.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853. The delta between them is 68.3 percent, meaning the NVIDIA card produces roughly three times the frame rate or compute throughput in this particular workload. This is not a marginal win; it is a decisive margin that places the two products in completely different performance tiers.

Looking at the average benchmark score, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 records 58657 across its two entries, which include the 3DMark Steel Nomad score and a Geekbench OpenCL result of 116460. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 2690, but this figure is based solely on that single 3DMark test. The discrepancy between the head-to-head result and the average score is important: the AMD card's average is inflated by the Geekbench OpenCL measurement, which is a different kind of workload. The head-to-head comparison uses only the common test, and there, the NVIDIA part wins outright.

The percentile rankings reinforce the gap. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms 88 percent of recorded graphics cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER sits at the 18th percentile, which appears low, but this is likely due to the limited benchmark data available for that card. The database only has one score for the NVIDIA part, so its percentile is computed from that single result. The AMD card has two scores, giving it a broader base for its percentile calculation. The head-to-head delta of 68.3 percent is the more reliable indicator of relative performance in the DX12 test.

The nearest rivals for each card clarify their positions. The AMD Radeon PRO V710's closest competitors include the NVIDIA P102-100 with an average score of 58528 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58392 with a delta of 0.5 percent, and the Intel Arc A570M at 58239 with a delta of 0.7 percent. These are all within 1 percent of the AMD card's average, indicating that the PRO V710 delivers performance comparable to those established parts. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER's nearest rivals are much lower in absolute terms: the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664, the GeForce GT 1030 at 2662, and the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660. The deltas here are 1.0, 1.1, and 1.1 percent respectively. This suggests that in the database's current state, the RTX 5070 SUPER's single score places it near those older or lower-tier cards, but that is an artifact of having only one benchmark result.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where it scores 116460. This is a compute-oriented benchmark that measures general-purpose GPU performance across a range of tasks. The NVIDIA card has no recorded Geekbench result, so the AMD part holds the only data point in that category. The AMD card also wins on average benchmark score, 58657 versus 2690, but that comparison is not apples to apples because the NVIDIA card lacks the second benchmark entry.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER wins the only shared test, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 2690 against 853. This benchmark is a modern DirectX 12 workload that stresses graphics rendering, ray tracing, and rasterization. The delta of 68.3 percent indicates that the NVIDIA part is substantially faster in this specific scenario. If the database had more shared tests, the picture might shift, but with the recorded data, the NVIDIA card has a clear win in the graphics-focused workload.

The wins break down by workload type. For pure compute, as measured by OpenCL, the AMD card has the recorded advantage. For DX12 gaming or graphics rendering, the NVIDIA card dominates the only available comparison. Neither card has data for other common benchmark suites like 3DMark Time Spy, Fire Strike, or VRMark, so the analysis must stay within the bounds of what the database contains.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on different architectures from different design generations. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codename Wheat Nas, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 generation. Both are manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor counts and die sizes differ significantly.

The AMD chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a die size of 346 mm², giving a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip packs 31,100 million transistors onto a smaller die of 263 mm², resulting in a higher density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip is denser and larger in transistor count despite being physically smaller. That density difference likely contributes to the NVIDIA card's higher performance in the shared benchmark.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The AMD card has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, but with a higher effective speed of 28 Gbps, it achieves 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has less memory but faster memory, which matters for bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The AMD card's larger capacity suits datasets that exceed 18 GB, while the NVIDIA card's higher bandwidth helps in scenarios where data movement is the bottleneck.

Compute resources also differ. The AMD card has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The NVIDIA card has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The NVIDIA card has nearly double the shading units, which explains its higher FP32 throughput: 32.15 TFLOPS versus 27.65 TFLOPS for the AMD card. Both achieve the same FP16 performance as FP32, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card also has 200 tensor cores and 50 RT cores, while the AMD card has 54 RT cores and no tensor cores. The AMD card has more RT cores than the NVIDIA card's 50, but the NVIDIA card's tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for AI workloads that the AMD card lacks.

Clock speeds favor the NVIDIA card. The AMD card runs at a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost of 2000 MHz. The NVIDIA card boosts to 2512 MHz from a base of 2325 MHz. Higher clocks, combined with more shading units, give the NVIDIA card a substantial raw compute advantage. Pixel rates and texture rates reflect this: the NVIDIA card delivers 201.0 GPixel/s and 502.4 GTexel/s, while the AMD card produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s.

Power consumption and physical design differ markedly. The AMD card has a TDP of 158 W, is single-slot, and uses a single 8-pin power connector. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 275 W, is dual-slot, and uses a single 16-pin connector. The AMD card is more power-efficient per watt, but the NVIDIA card uses more power to achieve higher performance. The AMD card has no display outputs, making it a compute-only card, while the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The NVIDIA card also has a recorded length of 245 mm (9.6 inches), height of 115 mm (4.5 inches), and width of 40 mm (1.6 inches), while the AMD card's dimensions are not listed.

The bus interface differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The NVIDIA card has a higher bandwidth link to the host system, which can benefit data transfer in compute workloads. The AMD card's suggested PSU is 450 W, while the NVIDIA card's suggested PSU is not recorded. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58657, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has an average of 2690. However, the AMD card has two benchmark entries, while the NVIDIA card has only one, so the averages are not directly comparable across the same set of tests.

Q: Why does the NVIDIA card have a lower percentile ranking despite winning the head-to-head test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER sits at the 18th percentile because the database has only one recorded score for it. That single score, 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, places it near lower-tier GPUs in the overall distribution. The AMD card has two scores, pushing it to the 88th percentile. The percentile reflects the number of recorded benchmarks, not necessarily the true performance tier.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA card has higher bandwidth at 672.0 GB/s versus 504.0 GB/s for the AMD card.

Q: Does the AMD card have any display outputs?

A: No, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, compared to 3456 for the AMD Radeon PRO V710. This contributes to the NVIDIA card's higher FP32 performance of 32.15 TFLOPS versus 27.65 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the transistor density difference?

A: The NVIDIA GB205 chip has a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter, while the AMD Navi 32 chip has 81.2 million per square millimeter. Both are fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy in the shared DX12 benchmark. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 68.3 percent higher than the AMD Radeon PRO V710's 853. That is a substantial margin, and it aligns with the raw specifications: more shading units, higher clocks, faster memory bandwidth, and a denser chip. For any workload that resembles that DX12 test, the NVIDIA card is the stronger choice.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has its own advantages. It offers 28 GB of memory, which is 10 GB more than the NVIDIA card's 18 GB. That capacity can accommodate larger datasets in compute tasks that require holding more data on the GPU. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 116460 shows strong compute capability, and its lower TDP of 158 W makes it a more power-efficient option. The AMD card is also single-slot, which fits in denser server configurations, but it lacks display outputs, so it is strictly for compute or rendering farms where a separate display adapter exists.

The NVIDIA card's higher bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s and PCIe 5.0 interface give it advantages in data-heavy operations. Its 200 tensor cores enable AI acceleration that the AMD card cannot match, as the AMD card has no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card's dual-slot design and 275 W TDP require more power and space, but the performance payoff in the recorded benchmark is significant.

For users prioritizing raw DX12 graphics performance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is the obvious pick based on the 68.3 percent lead. For users needing large memory capacity, lower power draw, or compute performance as measured by OpenCL, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has merits. The database currently lacks additional shared benchmarks, so conclusions must rest on the single head-to-head test and the specification differences.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO V710 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Chip | Navi 32 | GB205 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 81.2M / mm² | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 2325 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2512 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 28 GB | 18 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 224 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 504.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3456 | 6400 |

| TMUs | 216 | 200 |

| ROPs | 96 | 80 |

| RT Cores | 54 | 50 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 200 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 201.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 432.0 GTexel/s | 502.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 27.65 TFLOPS | 32.15 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 158 W | 275 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | Not recorded |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 245 mm x 115 mm x 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2024-10-02 | 2025-12-31 |

| Production Status | Not recorded | Active |

| Average Benchmark Score | 58657 | 2690 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 88 | 18 |