AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains one direct head-to-head benchmark between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile: Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the NVIDIA part records a score of 180,831, while the AMD part scores 116,460. The delta is -35.6%, meaning the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 35.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 in this OpenCL compute workload. This is a substantial margin, indicating that the NVIDIA GPU holds a clear advantage in general-purpose GPU compute tasks as measured by this benchmark.

Looking at the broader average benchmark scores, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 posts an average score of 58,657, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile averages 43,667. Interestingly, the AMD card has the higher average across all recorded benchmarks, despite losing the single shared test. This discrepancy arises because the AMD card has only two recorded benchmarks (3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and Geekbench OpenCL), while the NVIDIA card has nine recorded benchmarks, including several PassMark tests that pull its average down. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result for the AMD card is 853, a score not available for the NVIDIA card in this database.

The average score difference is 14,990 points in favor of the AMD Radeon PRO V710. When placed against its nearest rivals, the AMD card sits 0.2% above the NVIDIA P102-100 (average score 58,528), 0.5% above the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392), 0.7% above the Intel Arc A570M (58,239), and 1.0% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, by contrast, sits 0.8% above the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43,301), 0.9% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268), 0.9% above the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262), and 0.9% below the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (44,075). The percentile rankings also differ: the AMD card is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card is in the 84th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in the aggregate. Its average benchmark score of 58,657 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, which is higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 84th percentile. The AMD card also has a higher transistor density advantage in terms of power efficiency per watt, though that is covered in the architecture section. The data shows the AMD card outperforms its nearest rivals by margins ranging from 0.2% to 1.0%, indicating a tight cluster of similar-performing GPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile wins the only direct comparison available. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 180,831 is 35.6% higher than the AMD card's 116,460. The NVIDIA GPU also has a broader benchmark profile, with results across PassMark DirectX 9 (310), DirectX 10 (173), DirectX 11 (262), DirectX 12 (107), G2D (984), G3D (27,212), and GPU Compute (12,347). These additional benchmarks allow for a more complete picture of its performance across legacy and modern APIs, though no comparable scores exist for the AMD card in those tests.

For compute-heavy workloads that resemble OpenCL, the NVIDIA card is the clear winner based on the recorded data. For a single-score comparison across all available benchmarks, the AMD card has the higher average. The use case split is therefore: pick the AMD Radeon PRO V710 if you prioritize the overall average score and the 88th percentile standing, or pick the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile if you need the specific OpenCL performance advantage.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is built on the Navi 32 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, from the GeForce 40 Mobile generation. Both are manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor counts differ significantly: the AMD chip has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the NVIDIA chip has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. This results in transistor densities of 81.2M per mm² for AMD and 121.1M per mm² for NVIDIA, meaning the NVIDIA chip packs substantially more transistors per area.

The AMD card features 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It has 54 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card has 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores. The NVIDIA GPU therefore has nearly three times the shading units and significantly more ray tracing and tensor core hardware.

Memory configurations also differ. The AMD card has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card has more capacity but lower bandwidth; the NVIDIA card has less capacity but higher bandwidth. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Clock speeds show the AMD card running at a base of 1900 MHz and boost of 2000 MHz, while the NVIDIA card runs at a base of 1335 MHz and boost of 1695 MHz. Despite lower clocks, the NVIDIA card achieves higher raw compute throughput: FP32 performance is 32.98 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 27.65 TFLOPS for AMD. FP16 performance is identical to FP32 for both (1:1 ratio). Pixel rates are similar at 192.0 GPixel/s for AMD and 189.8 GPixel/s for NVIDIA, but texture rate favors NVIDIA at 515.3 GTexel/s versus 432.0 GTexel/s for AMD.

Power draw is notably different: the AMD card has a TDP of 158 W, while the NVIDIA card has a TDP of 120 W. The AMD card is a single-slot design requiring one 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The NVIDIA card is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no power connectors, and no suggested PSU is recorded. The AMD card has no display outputs, while the NVIDIA card's outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its mobile nature.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 43,667. The AMD card sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card sits in the 84th percentile.

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in OpenCL?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the NVIDIA card scores 180,831 versus the AMD card's 116,460, a delta of -35.6%. This means the NVIDIA GPU is 35.6% ahead of the AMD GPU in this specific benchmark.

Q: Which GPU has more memory, and does that translate to higher bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB. However, the NVIDIA card has higher memory bandwidth at 576.0 GB/s, compared to the AMD card's 504.0 GB/s, due to its wider 256-bit bus versus the AMD card's 224-bit bus.

Q: What is the transistor count difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Navi 32 chip contains 28,100 million transistors, while the NVIDIA AD103 chip contains 45,900 million transistors. The NVIDIA chip also has a higher transistor density at 121.1M per mm² versus 81.2M per mm² for AMD.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 9,728 shading units and 304 tensor cores. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card also has more ray tracing cores (76 versus 54).

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has a TDP of 120 W, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU recorded because it is an integrated GPU for portable devices.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO V710 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 32 | AD103 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Codename | Wheat Nas | None recorded |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | GeForce 40 Mobile |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 81.2M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 1335 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 1695 MHz |

| Memory Size | 28 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 224 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 504.0 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3456 | 9728 |

| TMUs | 216 | 304 |

| ROPs | 96 | 112 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 54 | 76 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 304 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 432.0 GTexel/s | 515.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 27.65 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 158 W | 120 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | None recorded |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2024-10-02 | 2023-01-02 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | GeForce 30 Mobile |

| Successor | None recorded | GeForce 50 Mobile |

| Production Status | None recorded | Active |

The Verdict

The data presents two distinct profiles. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation-oriented card with a higher average benchmark score (58,657) and a better percentile ranking (88th versus 84th). It offers 28 GB of memory, which is 12 GB more than the NVIDIA card, and it has a higher base and boost clock. However, it draws more power (158 W versus 120 W) and has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for direct display connection.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a mobile GPU with a clear advantage in the only shared benchmark: OpenCL compute, where it leads by 35.6%. It also has more shading units, tensor cores, ray tracing cores, higher memory bandwidth, and higher FP32 performance. Its lower TDP of 120 W and lack of power connectors make it appropriate for portable devices, as indicated by its "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs.

For users who need maximum OpenCL compute performance and the broader feature set of tensor and ray tracing hardware, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the stronger choice based on the recorded benchmarks. For users who prioritize the higher average score, the 88th percentile ranking, and the larger memory capacity of 28 GB, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the better option. The choice ultimately depends on whether the workload is dominated by the specific OpenCL test or by the overall aggregate performance across all recorded benchmarks.

The nearest rival data reinforces this split: the AMD card competes with desktop GPUs like the NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, while the NVIDIA mobile card sits near workstation-class cards like the RTX A6000 and Quadro M6000 variants. Neither card is decisively superior across all metrics; the recorded data favors NVIDIA in compute throughput and AMD in aggregate standing.