AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

The head-to-head data is lopsided: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER wins every shared benchmark against the AMD Radeon PRO V710, and by large margins. Yet the recorded specifications show the V710 holds clear advantages in memory capacity, board power, and form factor, which explains why the two cards target different buyers. The 4070 SUPER leads in raw graphics throughput; the V710 counters with a workstation profile built around a single-slot, low-power design and a much larger memory pool.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Only two tests appear in the database for both cards, and the NVIDIA card takes both.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result is the most dramatic gap. The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4627 against 853 for the Radeon PRO V710, a delta of 81.6 percent in NVIDIA's favor. A gap that wide is not a rounding dispute between neighbors; it places the cards in entirely different performance bands for modern DirectX 12 rasterization workloads. The database's head-to-head labeling attributes the win unambiguously to the GeForce card.

Geekbench OpenCL tells a similar story at a smaller scale. The 4070 SUPER posts 172795 while the V710 records 116460, a 32.6 percent advantage for NVIDIA. OpenCL compute is nominally a workload where the V710's professional positioning might have helped, but the results indicate otherwise: the GeForce card's compute throughput carries over into cross-platform GPGPU workloads, not just gaming.

Context from each card's rival cluster reinforces the split. The V710's average benchmark score of 58657 sits in the 88th percentile against all GPUs in the database, essentially tied with the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528, 0.2 percent), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, 0.5 percent), the Intel Arc A570M (58239, 0.7 percent), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, 1 percent). The 4070 SUPER averages 43223 at the 83rd percentile, bracketed by the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (43667). Note that these average scores come from different test mixes: the 4070 SUPER has ten recorded benchmark entries against two for the V710, so the averages are not directly interchangeable even though the head-to-head tests are.

Where Each One Wins

The 4070 SUPER wins on measured performance, full stop. In Steel Nomad it is 81.6 percent ahead; in OpenCL it is 32.6 percent ahead. Its additional recorded results extend the picture: a Geekbench Vulkan score of 205624, a PassMark G3D score of 29995, and a PassMark GPU Compute score of 17108, alongside PassMark DirectX results of 344 (DX9), 273 (DX11), 167 (DX10), 110 (DX12), and a G2D score of 1184. For anyone whose decision is driven by benchmark throughput, gaming, or GPU compute, the data points to the GeForce card.

The V710 wins where benchmarks do not measure: capacity and integration. Its 28 GB of GDDR6 more than doubles the 4070 SUPER's 12 GB, which matters for datasets and scenes that exceed the GeForce card's memory limit regardless of speed. Its single-slot width and 158 W TDP, fed by a single 8-pin connector with a 450 W suggested PSU, make it viable in constrained enclosures where the dual-slot, 220 W, 16-pin 4070 SUPER and its 550 W PSU recommendation would not fit. It also offers slightly higher theoretical pixel throughput via its 96 ROPs producing 192.0 GPixel/s, though the 4070 SUPER still edges it at 198.0 GPixel/s on paper. The one rate where the V710 genuinely trails badly is texturing: 432.0 GTexel/s against 554.4 GTexel/s.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs are fabbed by TSMC on a 5 nm process, so the node itself is a wash. The silicon beneath is not.

The V710 uses AMD's Navi 32 chip, RDNA 3.0 architecture, codename "Wheat Nas", part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. It packs 28,100 million transistors into a 346 mm² die, yielding a density of 81.2M per mm². The 4070 SUPER uses NVIDIA's AD104 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, GeForce 40-series generation, with 35,800 million transistors in 294 mm² and a notably denser 121.8M per mm². The NVIDIA die is smaller while carrying more transistors, a direct consequence of that density gap.

The execution resource split explains the benchmark outcome. The 4070 SUPER has 7168 shading units to the V710's 3456, more than a two-to-one raw advantage, and its clocks are far more aggressive: 1980 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost versus 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost for the V710. Those figures translate into 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 for the GeForce card against 27.65 TFLOPS for the Radeon PRO, with both running FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The 4070 SUPER also fields 224 tensor cores, a resource category where the V710 lists none, plus 56 RT cores to the V710's 54. Texture units are closer, 224 to 216, but favor NVIDIA.

Both parts share the same software baseline: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Specification Differences

The memory subsystems diverge sharply even though bandwidth is nearly identical. The V710 carries 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), delivering 504.0 GB/s. The 4070 SUPER carries 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective), delivering 504.2 GB/s. Effectively equal bandwidth, radically different capacity.

Physical and power profiles differ just as much. The V710 is a single-slot card with one 8-pin connector, a 158 W TDP, and a 450 W suggested PSU; the 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot card with a 16-pin connector, a 220 W TDP, a 550 W suggested PSU, and recorded dimensions of 267 mm length, 112 mm height, and 42 mm width.

Output configuration separates them cleanly: the V710 lists no display outputs at all, consistent with a headless compute or virtualization role, while the 4070 SUPER provides one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Release timing also differs: the 4070 SUPER arrived on 2024-01-16 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD and is now marked end-of-life, sitting between the GeForce 30 predecessor and GeForce 50 successor lines. The V710 was released on 2024-10-02 and traces its lineage to the Radeon Pro Vega. The V710's predecessor heritage and the 4070 SUPER's end-of-life status are both worth noting for anyone planning long-term deployment.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in shared benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER, decisively. It wins both head-to-head tests: 4627 vs 853 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (81.6 percent ahead) and 172795 vs 116460 in Geekbench OpenCL (32.6 percent ahead).

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Radeon PRO V710, with 28 GB of GDDR6 versus 12 GB of GDDR6X on the 4070 SUPER. Bandwidth is essentially tied at 504.0 vs 504.2 GB/s.

Q: Which card uses less power?

A: The V710, with a 158 W TDP, a single 8-pin connector, and a 450 W suggested PSU. The 4070 SUPER draws 220 W, needs a 16-pin connector, and specifies a 550 W PSU.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both connect over PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Can the Radeon PRO V710 drive monitors directly?

A: No. The database lists no display outputs for the V710, while the 4070 SUPER offers one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: Which card is newer?

A: The V710, released 2024-10-02, versus 2024-01-16 for the 4070 SUPER. The 4070 SUPER is flagged end-of-life in the database.

The Verdict

For pure performance, the data leaves no room for debate: the RTX 4070 SUPER wins every shared benchmark, by 32.6 percent in OpenCL and 81.6 percent in Steel Nomad, backed by higher FP32 throughput (35.48 vs 27.65 TFLOPS), more than double the shading units, and much higher boost clocks. Gamers, renderers, and general GPU-compute users should choose it on the numbers alone, keeping in mind its end-of-life status and its 12 GB memory ceiling.

The Radeon PRO V710 is a different tool. Its case rests on 28 GB of memory, a single-slot form factor, a 158 W power envelope, an 8-pin connector, and no display outputs: a profile suited to headless compute and dense multi-GPU installations where the 4070 SUPER's dual-slot width, 16-pin power, and halved memory would be disqualifying. It also sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database against the 4070 SUPER's 83rd, though that ranking reflects a smaller recorded test set. Choose the 4070 SUPER for speed; choose the V710 when capacity, power, and physical integration outrank raw throughput.