AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark database paints a clear picture: the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the stronger compute performer, winning the only shared head-to-head test decisively. In Geekbench OpenCL, the V710 scores 116,460 against the NVIDIA CMP 40HX's 93,395, a 19.8% lead. However, the CMP 40HX holds a higher overall percentile ranking at 93 versus the V710's 88, a distinction driven by different benchmark suites and scoring methodologies. The data suggests the V710 is for workloads needing massive memory capacity and raw FP32 throughput, while the CMP 40HX remains relevant for tasks where its specific benchmark profile and higher percentile standing matter. The V710's average benchmark score of 58,657 is dragged down by its 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 853, while the CMP 40HX's average of 85,637 reflects consistent performance across its two recorded tests. Buyers should weigh the V710's 28 GB memory and 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 against the CMP 40HX's 8 GB and 7.603 TFLOPS, understanding that the V710 is the compute specialist while the CMP 40HX offers a more balanced profile in the recorded data.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460, which is 19.8% higher than the NVIDIA CMP 40HX's 93,395 in the head-to-head benchmark.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA CMP 40HX has 8 GB of GDDR6. That is a 20 GB difference in favor of the V710.

Q: Which GPU has the higher transistor density?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710, built on a 5 nm process, has a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The NVIDIA CMP 40HX, using a 12 nm process, has a density of 24.3M per mm².

Q: How do the FP32 compute figures compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32, which is substantially higher than the NVIDIA CMP 40HX's 7.603 TFLOPS.

Q: Do either of these cards have display outputs?

A: No. Both the NVIDIA CMP 40HX and AMD Radeon PRO V710 are listed with "No outputs" in the database, meaning they are compute or mining focused without video connectivity.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The NVIDIA CMP 40HX was released on February 24, 2021, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 came later on October 2, 2024.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and foundry nodes. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX uses the TU106 chip based on the Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It packs 10,800 million transistors into a 445 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 24.3M per mm². The AMD Radeon PRO V710 employs the Navi 32 chip with the newer RDNA 3.0 architecture, using a 5 nm process also at TSMC. This chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a smaller 346 mm² die, producing a far higher density of 81.2M per mm². The V710's predecessor is listed as the Radeon Pro Vega, clearly marking it as a more modern design.

Feature sets diverge significantly. The CMP 40HX has 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, augmented by 36 ray tracing cores and 288 tensor cores. The V710 counters with 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, plus 54 ray tracing cores, but notably has no tensor cores listed. The V710's FP16 performance equals its FP32 at 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the CMP 40HX doubles its FP32 to reach 15.21 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). This indicates different compute philosophies, with the V710 favoring consistent precision and the CMP 40HX using a packed math approach for half-precision work.

The bus interface also differs, with the CMP 40HX using PCIe 1.0 x4 and the V710 using the far more capable PCIe 4.0 x16. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The V710's newer RDNA 3.0 architecture likely explains its higher clock speeds and better power efficiency, as evidenced by its lower TDP despite far higher compute throughput.

Specification Differences

The database records several key specification differences between the two cards. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX has a base clock of 1470 MHz and boost clock of 1650 MHz, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 runs higher at 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost. Memory configurations differ sharply: the CMP 40HX has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus delivering 448.0 GB/s, while the V710 has 28 GB GDDR6 on a 224 bit bus achieving 504.0 GB/s. The V710's memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the CMP 40HX's 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Physical specifications show the CMP 40HX is a dual-slot card measuring 229 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 35 mm in width, while the V710 is a single-slot card with no recorded dimensions. Both use a single 8-pin power connector and recommend a 450 W PSU. The CMP 40HX has a TDP of 185 W, while the V710 is more efficient at 158 W despite its higher compute output. The CMP 40HX has a launch MSRP of 699 USD (stated once here), while no MSRP is recorded for the V710. The CMP 40HX is marked as end-of-life production, with no status given for the V710.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Only one benchmark appears in the shared head-to-head dataset: Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460 against the NVIDIA CMP 40HX's 93,395, giving the V710 a 19.8% advantage. This is a substantial margin, indicating that the V710's higher shader count, faster clocks, and larger memory bandwidth translate into real-world compute wins. The V710's 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 versus the CMP 40HX's 7.603 TFLOPS helps explain this result, as OpenCL workloads often stress raw FP32 throughput.

Beyond the shared test, the database lists separate benchmarks for each card. The CMP 40HX also records a Geekbench Vulkan score of 77,879, which is lower than its OpenCL result. The V710 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853, a low number that pulls its average benchmark score down to 58,657. The CMP 40HX's average benchmark score is 85,637, derived from its two Geekbench tests.

The percentile rankings reflect different populations: the CMP 40HX sits at the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, while the V710 is at the 88th percentile. This suggests the CMP 40HX's benchmark profile is more consistently strong relative to the broader GPU landscape, even though it loses the direct comparison. The V710's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 at 0.2% lower average score, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 0.5% lower, the Intel Arc A570M at 0.7% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 1% lower. The CMP 40HX's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 at 1.7% lower, the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 at 2.1% lower, the AMD Radeon PRO W6600 at 4.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X at 5.8% higher.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins the compute battle decisively. Its 19.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL, combined with 28 GB of memory and 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, makes it the clear choice for memory-intensive compute workloads like large dataset processing, scientific simulations, or AI inference where the tensor cores of the CMP 40HX are absent. The V710's 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 is over 3.6 times the CMP 40HX's 7.603 TFLOPS, and its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 432.0 GTexel/s texture rate dwarf the CMP 40HX's 105.6 GPixel/s and 237.6 GTexel/s. The V710 also does this at lower power, 158 W versus 185 W, and in a single-slot form factor, making it more efficient for dense compute installations.

The NVIDIA CMP 40HX wins in overall benchmark standing, with its 93rd percentile versus the V710's 88th. Its average benchmark score of 85,637 is substantially higher than the V710's 58,657, though this is largely due to the V710's low 3DMark result. The CMP 40HX's tensor cores, 288 of them, offer specialized hardware for workloads that can leverage them, and its 256 bit memory bus provides a wider path despite lower total bandwidth. The CMP 40HX's 12 nm Turing architecture with 36 RT cores may also be relevant for ray tracing tasks, though neither card has display outputs to verify visual output.

For users prioritizing raw compute and memory capacity, the V710 is the data-backed choice. For those seeking a card with a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs and a more balanced benchmark profile, the CMP 40HX holds appeal. The V710's single-slot design and lower TDP also make it easier to deploy in multi-GPU systems. The CMP 40HX, with its end-of-life status and higher launch MSRP of 699 USD, is the older product, while the V710's 2024 release date indicates longer-term driver support potential. The data ultimately favors the V710 for compute, with the CMP 40HX retaining a niche based on its percentile standing and tensor core availability.