AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains two benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon PRO V710, while the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database at this time. Direct head-to-head comparisons are therefore limited to the available measurements for the AMD part.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This result places the card in the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. For context, the average benchmark score across the two recorded tests is 58,657 points, with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460 contributing the bulk of that average. The Steel Nomad result is a demanding modern workload, and the score indicates the card handles DX12 rendering tasks with substantial headroom.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the Radeon PRO V710 delivers 116,460 points. This is a compute-oriented workload that stresses raw throughput across the GPU's execution units. The result aligns with the card's FP32 rating of 27.65 TFLOPS, which is recorded in the specifications. The OpenCL score is roughly 136 times higher than the Steel Nomad score, which is expected given the different nature of the tests: one measures graphics rendering performance, the other measures general-purpose compute throughput.

The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile ranking sits at 50, which is the median position, but this is based on zero measured data points. The average benchmark score is recorded as 0, reflecting the absence of entries. Any comparison between the two parts must therefore rely on the specification differences and the architectural characteristics rather than direct performance measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO V710?

A: The average benchmark score is 58,657 points, based on two recorded tests: 853 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Intel part, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What percentile ranking does each GPU hold?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 ranks in the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the AMD Radeon PRO V710 based on average score?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P102-100 with an average score of 58,528 (0.2% difference), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT with 58,392 (0.5% difference), the Intel Arc A570M with 58,239 (0.7% difference), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM with 58,085 (1% difference).

Q: What is the release date for each product?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 was released on October 2, 2024. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has a release date of January 26, 2026.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has a boost clock of 2300 MHz, which is higher.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear separation in positioning between these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a discrete, high-performance workstation part with substantial compute resources and dedicated memory. Its 88th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 58,657 place it alongside capable desktop GPUs such as the NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, both of which sit within 0.5% of its average score.

The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor designed for mobile platforms, with no recorded benchmark results. Its 50th percentile ranking is a default value rather than a measured performance indicator. The part operates at a 25 W TDP, uses system shared memory, and is built for portable devices. Its role is fundamentally different from the Radeon PRO V710, which draws 158 W, uses 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and requires a PCIe 4.0 x16 connection.

For workloads where dedicated compute and rendering throughput are required, the AMD part is the only one with measured data to support its capabilities. The Intel part has no recorded results to validate its performance in any specific task. The choice between these two depends on the platform: the Radeon PRO V710 serves desktop systems with a single-slot form factor and an 8-pin power connector, while the Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors and display outputs that depend on the portable device.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification category. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm node from Intel. Transistor count for the AMD part is 28,100 million, and the die size is 346 mm²; the Intel part has unknown values for both. Transistor density is recorded as 81.2 million transistors per square millimeter for the AMD part.

Memory configurations are fundamentally different. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224 bit bus, with bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel part uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent or shared.

The AMD GPU has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel GPU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 4 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate for the AMD part is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 36.80 GPixel/s for the Intel part. Texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s versus 73.60 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 27.65 TFLOPS for the AMD part and 2.355 TFLOPS for the Intel part. FP16 throughput is 27.65 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio for AMD and 4.710 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio for Intel.

Power and physical specifications also diverge. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, is single-slot, uses one 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, is an IGP, has no power connectors, and has no suggested power supply. The AMD part uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and has no display outputs; the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface and has portable device dependent display outputs.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. Its predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega. The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation for Panther Lake. It has no recorded predecessor.

The process nodes reflect different manufacturing approaches: TSMC's 5 nm process for AMD versus Intel's 3 nm process for Intel. The AMD part has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. The large base clock difference indicates the AMD part maintains high sustained frequencies, while the Intel part uses a low idle base and scales up under load.

Ray tracing capabilities exist on both parts, with 54 RT cores on the AMD side and 4 on the Intel side. Neither part lists tensor cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD part has no display outputs, which indicates it is intended for compute or rendering tasks where output is handled by another GPU. The Intel part, as an integrated solution, provides display output through the portable device.

The FP16 ratio differs: AMD achieves a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning full-rate half-precision compute. Intel achieves a 2:1 ratio, meaning half-rate FP16 relative to FP32. This difference affects workloads that rely on half-precision arithmetic, such as certain AI inference tasks, though neither part lists tensor cores.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every category where measured data exists. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 demonstrates capability in modern graphics rendering workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460 shows strong compute throughput. The 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 rating supports heavy single-precision compute tasks. The 28 GB of GDDR6 memory with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth enables large datasets to reside locally on the card, avoiding system memory bottlenecks. The 96 ROPs and 216 TMUs provide high pixel and texture fill rates at 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s respectively. The 54 ray tracing cores give it dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects in supported applications.

The Intel Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile wins in efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the AMD part's 158 W, making it suitable for battery-powered portable devices. Its 2300 MHz boost clock is higher than the AMD part's 2000 MHz boost, which helps compensate for its smaller execution footprint. The 3 nm process node from Intel represents a newer manufacturing technology compared to the 5 nm node used by AMD. The system shared memory architecture eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM, reducing cost and complexity in mobile designs. The 2:1 FP16 ratio provides a path for half-precision workloads, though at lower absolute throughput than the AMD part.

The AMD part wins in raw performance, dedicated memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and workstation-oriented features. The Intel part wins in power efficiency, integration simplicity, and portability. The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means its actual performance in any workload remains unverified in the database. The AMD part's 88th percentile ranking versus the Intel part's default 50th percentile ranking reflects this data gap rather than a direct performance comparison.