AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc B370 Comparison

The Verdict

The data separates these two GPUs into entirely different performance classes. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Intel Arc B370 lands at the 5th percentile. The single shared benchmark, 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12, shows the Intel part scoring 1184 against AMD's 853, a 28% deficit for the AMD card. This result is counterintuitive given the rest of the recorded specifications, so the verdict depends heavily on workload context.

For users requiring a discrete, high-throughput compute accelerator with substantial memory capacity and professional-grade API support, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the clear choice. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA P102-100 (0.2% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.5% ahead), Intel Arc A570M (0.7% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (1% ahead). These are all substantial desktop or mobile graphics parts, placing the V710 firmly in the upper tier.

The Intel Arc B370, by contrast, has nearest rivals that are ancient or low-end parts: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (0.2% behind), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (0.5% behind), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (0.7% behind), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1.4% ahead). This positions the B370 as an integrated graphics solution suited for basic rendering and power-constrained environments, not for demanding compute tasks. The verdict is straightforward: choose the V710 for professional compute and rendering workloads, choose the B370 only where an integrated GPU with minimal power draw is the requirement.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation and is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². This is a full discrete GPU implementation with a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown in the database, and no transistor density figure exists. The bus interface is listed as IGP, meaning it is an integrated graphics processor rather than a discrete card.

Architecturally, the two differ fundamentally in execution resources. The AMD chip provides 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel chip provides 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster operation units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The AMD part offers roughly 2.7 times the shading units, 5.4 times the TMUs, 4.8 times the ROPs, and 5.4 times the ray tracing cores.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so feature-level API compatibility is identical. The AMD card includes no display outputs, while the Intel B370's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The AMD part is a single-slot card requiring a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, whereas the Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU figure.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark in the database is 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12. The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853. The delta is -28% from the AMD card's perspective, meaning the Intel part outperforms it by 28% in this specific test. This is the sole head-to-head data point, and it gives the Intel B370 one win out of one comparison.

This result is notable because the AMD card's other recorded benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, shows a score of 116460, while the Intel B370 has no OpenCL result in the database. The AMD card's average benchmark score is 58657 across its two recorded tests, placing it at the 88th percentile. The Intel B370's average benchmark score is 1184 from its single test, placing it at the 5th percentile.

The disparity between the Steel Nomad result and the overall percentile rankings suggests the Steel Nomad workload favors the Intel architecture's specific characteristics, or that the AMD card's performance is heavily driver or workload dependent. The database shows no other overlapping benchmarks, so drawing broad conclusions from this single result would be premature. What the data confirms is that in this one DX12 test, the Intel B370 delivers a 28% higher score.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 operates with a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, while the Intel Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD card's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed; the Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated clock.

Memory configuration diverges sharply. The AMD card has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel B370 uses system shared memory, with bus width and bandwidth both listed as system dependent. This gives the AMD part a massive memory capacity and bandwidth advantage for large datasets.

Compute throughput also differs substantially. The AMD card delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 27.65 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The Intel B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The AMD card has 4.5 times the FP32 throughput and 2.25 times the FP16 throughput.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The AMD card achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s. The Intel part achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The AMD card leads by 4 times in pixel rate and 4.5 times in texture rate.

Power consumption is the area where the Intel B370 dominates. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, while the Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W. The Intel part consumes 84% less power. The AMD card requires a single-slot form factor and a 1x 8-pin connector, while the Intel part is an IGP with no power connector.

Release dates differ as well. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 was released on 2024-10-02, while the Intel Arc B370 is dated 2026-01-26 and its production status is active. The AMD card's predecessor is listed as Radeon Pro Vega; the Intel part has no predecessor recorded. Neither part has a recorded successor or launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher overall benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the Intel Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile. The AMD card's average benchmark score is 58657, versus 1184 for the Intel part.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B370 win any benchmark against the AMD Radeon PRO V710?

A: Yes. In the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 versus 853 for the AMD card, a 28% advantage for Intel. This is the only head-to-head benchmark recorded, and it gives Intel one win out of one comparison.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, requires a single-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. The Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W, is an integrated GPU with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU figure.

Q: What are the API capabilities of both GPUs?

A: Both the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the Intel Arc B370 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. There is no difference in recorded API support between the two.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 54 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc B370 has 10. The AMD part also leads in shading units (3456 versus 1280), TMUs (216 versus 40), and ROPs (96 versus 20).

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in compute-heavy workloads that benefit from raw throughput and memory capacity. Its 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 28 GB of GDDR6 make it suited for large-scale data processing, professional rendering, and scientific compute. Its 88th percentile ranking and nearest rivals including the NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT confirm it competes in the upper tier of GPUs. The absence of display outputs indicates the V710 is designed as a pure compute accelerator rather than a graphics output device.

The Intel Arc B370 wins in power-constrained environments. Its 25 W TDP versus the AMD card's 158 W represents an 84% reduction in power draw. As an integrated GPU with no power connectors and a 3 nm process, it fits into portable devices where space and cooling are limited. Its 5th percentile ranking and nearest rivals from the ATI Radeon HD era indicate it is not intended for demanding 3D workloads. The single Steel Nomad win, however, shows that in at least one DX12 scenario the Intel part can outperform the AMD card despite its far smaller resource allocation.

For users with a discrete PCIe slot and a power budget of at least 450 W, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the only viable option between these two. For users needing a low-power integrated solution in a portable device, the Intel Arc B370 is the appropriate choice. The data does not support using the Intel part for professional compute tasks, nor does it support using the AMD card in a power-sensitive or integrated context. The two GPUs occupy opposite ends of the performance and power spectrum, and the recorded benchmarks reflect that split.