AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc A770 Comparison

The Intel Arc A770 and AMD Radeon PRO V710 occupy distinct corners of the GPU landscape, with the data revealing a clear split between raw 3D rendering and compute throughput. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Arc A770 delivers a crushing 248.1% higher score (2969 vs 853), establishing it as the decisive winner for DirectX 12 gaming and real-time graphics workloads. Conversely, the Radeon PRO V710 takes the Geekbench OpenCL crown by 6.3% (116460 vs 109175), indicating superior raw compute performance for general-purpose and professional workloads. The Arc A770 sits at the 90th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 68809, while the PRO V710 lands at the 88th percentile with 58657. The A770’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (deltaPct -0.3%) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (deltaPct -1.5%), while the PRO V710’s closest competitors are the NVIDIA P102-100 (deltaPct 0.2%) and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct 0.5%). For a user prioritizing 3D rendering performance, the Arc A770 is the clear choice; for compute-heavy tasks, the PRO V710 offers measurable advantages.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The Intel Arc A770 wins decisively with a score of 2969, which is 248.1% higher than the AMD Radeon PRO V710’s score of 853. This massive delta indicates a fundamental advantage in DirectX 12 real-time rendering workloads.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 offer any performance advantage over the Intel Arc A770?

A: Yes, in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116460, which is 6.3% higher than the Intel Arc A770’s 109175. This suggests the PRO V710 has an edge in compute-oriented tasks that leverage OpenCL.

Q: How do these GPUs compare in terms of memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 features 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While the PRO V710 has significantly more capacity, the A770 has slightly higher bandwidth.

Q: What are the thermal and power design differences between the two?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has a TDP of 225 W and is a dual-slot card requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and both a 6-pin and 8-pin power connector. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a lower TDP of 158 W, is a single-slot card, requires a 450 W suggested PSU, and uses only a single 8-pin connector.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a higher FP32 throughput at 27.65 TFLOPS, compared to the Intel Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS. This aligns with the PRO V710’s lead in the OpenCL benchmark.

Q: What is the difference in their production status?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is marked as end-of-life, with its release date in 2022 and a successor in Battlemage. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no production status listed, was released in 2024, and has no listed successor.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist (Arc 7) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, in the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. It is built on a more advanced 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with 28,100 million transistors packed into a smaller 346 mm² die, achieving a higher transistor density of 81.2M per mm². This process advantage allows the PRO V710 to house nearly 30% more transistors in a physically smaller package.

The compute layouts differ substantially. The Arc A770 features 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The PRO V710 counters with fewer resources: 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, but a significantly higher count of 54 ray tracing cores. This suggests AMD’s design allocates more silicon to ray tracing acceleration, while Intel’s approach emphasizes raw shading and rasterization throughput. The FP16 capabilities also diverge: the Arc A770 achieves 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 via a 2:1 ratio, whereas the PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. This means the A770 can double its FP32 rate for FP16 workloads, while the PRO V710 maintains a constant throughput regardless of precision.

Memory architecture reflects different priorities. The Arc A770 uses a 256-bit bus for its 16 GB GDDR6, achieving 512.0 GB/s. The PRO V710 opts for a narrower 224-bit bus but compensates with 28 GB GDDR6, yielding 504.0 GB/s. The PRO V710’s larger capacity is clearly aimed at compute tasks needing large datasets, while the A770’s wider bus provides marginally higher bandwidth. In terms of physical design, the Arc A770 is a dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, while the PRO V710 is a single-slot card with a much lower 158 W TDP, reflecting its efficiency-oriented design.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every measurable specification. The process node is a key divergence: the Arc A770 uses 6 nm, while the PRO V710 uses 5 nm. Transistor counts are 21,700 million for the A770 versus 28,100 million for the PRO V710, with die sizes of 406 mm² and 346 mm² respectively. Base clocks are 2100 MHz for the A770 and 1900 MHz for the PRO V710, with boost clocks of 2400 MHz and 2000 MHz respectively. Memory clocks are 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for the A770 and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the PRO V710.

Memory capacity is a major differentiator: 16 GB for the A770 versus 28 GB for the PRO V710. The bus widths are 256-bit and 224-bit, respectively, leading to nearly identical bandwidths of 512.0 GB/s and 504.0 GB/s. The A770 has more shading units (4096 vs 3456), TMUs (256 vs 216), and ROPs (128 vs 96), but the PRO V710 has more ray tracing cores (54 vs 32). Pixel rates are 307.2 GPixel/s for the A770 versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the PRO V710, and texture rates are 614.4 GTexel/s versus 432.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance favors the PRO V710 at 27.65 TFLOPS versus 19.66 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance favors the A770 at 39.32 TFLOPS versus 27.65 TFLOPS.

Power and physical specs are starkly different. The A770 has a 225 W TDP, dual-slot design, and requires 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin connectors with a 550 W suggested PSU. The PRO V710 has a 158 W TDP, single-slot design, requires only 1x 8-pin connector, and has a 450 W suggested PSU. Display outputs differ critically: the A770 includes 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, while the PRO V710 lists no outputs, indicating a compute-focused card. The A770 has a launch MSRP of 329 USD, while the PRO V710 has no MSRP listed. Release dates are 2022 for the A770 and 2024 for the PRO V710.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a split decision, with each card claiming one victory. The most dramatic result is in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the Intel Arc A770 scores 2969 compared to the AMD Radeon PRO V710’s 853. This represents a 248.1% advantage for the A770, a margin that dwarfs any other comparison in the data. The A770’s score in this test is more than triple that of its competitor, indicating that for DirectX 12 gaming and real-time graphics, the A770 is in an entirely different performance class. This result aligns with the A770’s superior pixel rate (307.2 GPixel/s vs 192.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (614.4 GTexel/s vs 432.0 GTexel/s), which directly feed 3D rendering performance.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 takes the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark with a score of 116460, edging out the Intel Arc A770’s 109175 by 6.3%. While this margin is far smaller than the A770’s 3DMark victory, it is consistent and meaningful. The PRO V710’s higher FP32 throughput (27.65 TFLOPS vs 19.66 TFLOPS) provides a plausible basis for this advantage in compute workloads. Notably, there is no Geekbench Vulkan score listed for the PRO V710, while the A770 has a Vulkan score of 94284, which cannot be directly compared. The average benchmark scores reflect this split: the A770 averages 68809 across all tests, while the PRO V710 averages 58657, a difference driven largely by the A770’s massive 3DMark win.

The nearest rival data provides additional context. The Arc A770’s average score places it just 0.3% below the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (69000) and 0.4% above the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562). The PRO V710’s average sits 0.2% above the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528) and 0.5% above the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392). These rivalries show that both cards are competitive within their respective performance tiers. The A770’s 90th percentile ranking versus the PRO V710’s 88th percentile is consistent with the A770’s higher average score. For users weighing these options, the choice hinges on workload: the A770 dominates in DirectX 12 rendering, while the PRO V710 offers a modest but real edge in OpenCL compute, along with substantially more memory capacity.