GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO V710

CORE STATE Navi 32

VRAM 28 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz

TDP 158 W

BUS WIDTH 224 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

GPU

Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz

TDP 225 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

853

2,612

geekbench_opencl

116,460

98,554

geekbench_vulkan

N/A

85,631

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

181

passmark_g2d

N/A

732

passmark_g3d

N/A

12,534

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

5,368

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc A750

Reviewing the test data for the Arc A750 card from Intel and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 card from AMD, a picture of competitive capability unfolds. None of the GPU dominates repeatedly throughout the benchmarks. The swapping of advantages means underlying balance. Consumers face a genuine dilemma with these options. The two options achieve capable gaming capability.

When performance is remarkably comparable, value and functionality become the main elements. Consider hardware RT performance, upscaling technology, energy efficiency, and software quality when selecting between the Arc A750 card from Intel and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 card from AMD. Such variables might influence the choice. Consider broadly. This broader picture counts.

Gaming tests also indicate matched scores between the Arc A750 card from Intel and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 card from AMD. Frame rates deltas often land below testing variance. Such slight differences are hardly visible during practical gaming sessions. Each options provide fluid performance. Gamers can select confidently between these two.

Finally, buyers might decide based on specific requirements over benchmark performance solely. Both the Arc A750 card from Intel and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 card from AMD achieve strong visual throughput for their given price points. The selection comes down to particular needs. Any option is solid. Consumers couldn't go badly here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

PRO V710

A750

Core Specs

Shading Units

3,456

3,584 +3.7%

Shaders

3,456

3,584 +3.7%

TMUs

216

224 +3.7%

ROPs

112 +16.7%

Compute Units

—

Execution Units

—

448

Clocks

Base Clock

1900 MHz

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

2000 MHz

2400 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

28 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

28,672

8,192 -71.4%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

224 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

504.0 GB/s

512.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

—

L2 Cache

2 MB

16 MB

L3 Cache

54 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

192.0 GPixel/s

268.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

432.0 GTexel/s

537.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

27.65 TFLOPS

17.20 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

864.0 GFLOPS (1:32)

2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

55.30 TFLOPS (2:1)

34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

28 -48.1%

XMX Cores

—

448

Power

TDP

158 W

225 W

TDP (W)

158

225 +42.4%

Suggested PSU

450 W

550 W

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Navi 32

DG2-512

Codename

Wheat Nas

—

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)

Alchemist (Arc 7)

Process Size

5 nm

6 nm

Transistors

28,100 million

21,700 million

Die Size

346 mm²

406 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

81.2M / mm²

53.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

Dual-slot

Outputs

No outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

289 USD

Production

—

End-of-life

Predecessor

Radeon Pro Vega

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon PRO V710 Details View Arc A750 Details