AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT Comparison

# Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits these two AMD parts along clear lines of compute workload versus mobility integration. The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT records a single OpenCL benchmark score of 76,904, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 records an OpenCL score of 116,460 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853. In the only direct head-to-head test available, the Geekbench OpenCL workload, the PRO V710 wins outright with a 34% margin over the RX 6650M XT. The database shows zero wins for the RX 6650M XT and one win for the PRO V710 in their shared test suite.

The RX 6650M XT belongs to the Radeon RX 6000 series and is built for portable devices, as its slot width of IGP (integrated graphics processor form factor) and portable-device-dependent display outputs indicate. Its value in the database comes from its position at the 91st percentile among all GPUs, which places it above the PRO V710's 88th percentile. That percentile ranking reflects the RX 6650M XT's average benchmark score of 76,904, which is its only recorded benchmark. The PRO V710, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 58,657, dragged down by the inclusion of its lower 3DMark result alongside the much higher OpenCL result.

For compute-heavy OpenCL workloads, the PRO V710 is the clear winner, and the data shows that the RX 6650M XT's advantage is entirely positional: it sits higher in the overall percentile distribution despite losing the head-to-head compute test. Users seeking a mobile-friendly part with a strong percentile standing would look at the RX 6650M XT, while those prioritizing raw OpenCL throughput would select the PRO V710.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT has an average benchmark score of 76,904, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657. The RX 6650M XT also ranks higher at the 91st percentile versus the PRO V710's 88th percentile.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460 compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT's 76,904, giving the PRO V710 a 34% lead in the direct head-to-head comparison.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs offer?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher compute throughput in FP32 operations?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT delivers 9.896 TFLOPS. The PRO V710 also matches its FP32 rate in FP16 at 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1), whereas the RX 6650M XT reaches 19.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT has a 120 W TDP with no power connectors, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a 158 W TDP, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and carries a suggested PSU rating of 450 W.

Q: Which GPU has the higher transistor density?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710, built on a 5 nm process, has a transistor density of 81.2M per square millimeter, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT's 7 nm process with 46.7M per square millimeter.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains one direct head-to-head benchmark between these two GPUs: Geekbench OpenCL. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460, and the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT scores 76,904. The delta percentage of 34% indicates the PRO V710 outperforms the RX 6650M XT by that margin in this compute-oriented test. This is a substantial gap, and it aligns with the PRO V710's larger GPU configuration: 3,456 shading units versus 2,048, 216 texture mapping units versus 128, and 96 ROPs versus 64.

The RX 6650M XT does not win any recorded head-to-head benchmark against the PRO V710. Its only benchmark score, 76,904 in Geekbench OpenCL, is the same figure used in the head-to-head comparison, so the RX 6650M XT's case rests entirely on its percentile standing rather than a direct test victory. The PRO V710 also has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853, a test the RX 6650M XT does not appear in, further widening the PRO V710's recorded test coverage.

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database provides context for the RX 6650M XT's OpenCL result. The RX 6650M XT sits 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D (77,712 average), 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78,940), 3.1% behind the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79,396), and 3.4% behind the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605). These are narrow margins, all within 3.4% of the RX 6650M XT's 76,904 score. For the PRO V710, its average score of 58,657 is nearly matched by the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58,528 (0.2% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392 (0.5% faster), the Intel Arc A570M at 58,239 (0.7% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 (1% faster). The PRO V710's average is pulled down by the 3DMark result, but its OpenCL score of 116,460 stands well above the RX 6650M XT's 76,904.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT uses the Navi 23 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture. The process nodes differ: 7 nm for the RX 6650M XT versus 5 nm for the PRO V710, both fabricated by TSMC. Transistor counts diverge sharply, with 11,060 million transistors on the RX 6650M XT and 28,100 million on the PRO V710. Die sizes are 237 mm² versus 346 mm², and transistor density is 46.7M per square millimeter versus 81.2M per square millimeter.

Clock speeds show the RX 6650M XT running higher: base clock of 2068 MHz versus 1900 MHz, and boost clock of 2416 MHz versus 2000 MHz. The RX 6650M XT also lists a game clock of 2162 MHz, which the PRO V710 does not specify. Memory clocks differ as well, with the RX 6650M XT at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and the PRO V710 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Memory capacity is a major differentiator: 8 GB versus 28 GB, with bus widths of 128 bit versus 224 bit, and bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s versus 504.0 GB/s.

Compute resources favor the PRO V710 across the board: 3,456 shading units versus 2,048, 216 TMUs versus 128, 96 ROPs versus 64, and 54 ray tracing cores versus 32. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s for the PRO V710 versus 154.6 GPixel/s for the RX 6650M XT, and texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s versus 309.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS versus 9.896 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 19.79 TFLOPS (2:1). Power draw is 120 W for the RX 6650M XT and 158 W for the PRO V710.

Form factor and connectivity also differ. The RX 6650M XT is IGP slot width with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs, while the PRO V710 is single-slot with one 8-pin power connector, a 450 W suggested PSU, and no display outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the RX 6650M XT and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the PRO V710. Release dates are January 2022 for the RX 6650M XT and October 2024 for the PRO V710.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two GPUs spans two generations of AMD design. The RX 6650M XT uses RDNA 2.0 on the Navi 23 chip, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 6000M) generation, with a 7 nm TSMC process. The PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 on the Navi 32 chip, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation, with a 5 nm TSMC process. The codename for the PRO V710 is Wheat Nas, while the RX 6650M XT has no recorded codename.

The PRO V710's RDNA 3.0 architecture brings a significantly larger GPU: 28,100 million transistors versus 11,060 million, and a die size of 346 mm² versus 237 mm². The 5 nm process enables a much higher transistor density of 81.2M per square millimeter compared to 46.7M per square millimeter on the 7 nm process. The PRO V710 doubles the FP16 throughput ratio at 1:1, meaning it processes FP16 at the same rate as FP32, whereas the RX 6650M XT uses a 2:1 ratio that halves FP16 throughput relative to its FP32 rate.

Ray tracing hardware scales with the architecture generation. The RX 6650M XT includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the PRO V710 includes 54. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API coverage is identical. The PRO V710's memory subsystem is substantially larger at 28 GB with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus 8 GB with 256.0 GB/s for the RX 6650M XT. The PRO V710 also doubles the bus interface width to PCIe 4.0 x16 from PCIe 4.0 x8, which matters for data transfer in compute workloads. The RX 6650M XT's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, while the PRO V710's predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega, reflecting their different product lineages: mobile gaming versus professional compute.

The Verdict

The data points toward the AMD Radeon PRO V710 for users prioritizing raw compute performance. Its OpenCL score of 116,460 is 34% higher than the RX 6650M XT's 76,904, and its FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is nearly three times the RX 6650M XT's 9.896 TFLOPS. The PRO V710 also offers 28 GB of memory with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, more than triple the capacity and nearly double the bandwidth of the RX 6650M XT's 8 GB and 256.0 GB/s. Its 158 W TDP and single-slot design with a 450 W suggested PSU make it a workstation-oriented part, and its lack of display outputs reinforces that role as a compute accelerator.

The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT appeals to a different use case: mobile integration. Its IGP slot width, no power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs place it in laptops. Its 120 W TDP is lower than the PRO V710's 158 W, and its 91st percentile standing among all GPUs exceeds the PRO V710's 88th percentile. For users who need a mobile GPU with a strong overall ranking, the RX 6650M XT holds that position, even though it loses the direct OpenCL comparison.

The verdict from the database is straightforward: the PRO V710 wins the compute benchmark decisively, offers far more memory and bandwidth, and delivers higher pixel and texture rates. The RX 6650M XT wins on percentile placement and lower power draw, suited to portable systems. Users with compute-heavy workloads should choose the PRO V710; users with space and power constraints in mobile devices should choose the RX 6650M XT.