AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M Comparison

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon PRO V710 occupy different tiers of the Radeon Pro lineup, with the data showing a decisive performance gap between the two. The PRO V710, a newer Navi 32 part built on RDNA 3.0, delivers roughly double the raw compute throughput of the older RDNA 2.0-based W6600M. Benchmark results and architectural specifications paint a clear picture: these are not direct competitors but rather products for distinct workloads and system form factors.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark in the data is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is lopsided. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460 points, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 56,140 points. This represents a 51.8% delta in favor of the PRO V710, meaning the newer card is more than twice as fast in this compute-oriented test. The magnitude of this gap is consistent with the massive differences in shading units, memory bandwidth, and FP32 throughput between the two cards.

Looking at broader average benchmark scores, the W6600M actually holds a slight edge. The W6600M posts an average benchmark score of 61,896, which places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. In contrast, the PRO V710’s average score is 58,657, ranking in the 88th percentile. This inversion—where the PRO V710 wins the single OpenCL test but has a lower average—suggests the PRO V710’s benchmark profile is more specialized, possibly skewed by workloads that favor its specific architecture or driver optimizations.

The nearest rivals for each card further contextualize their positions. The W6600M sits within 2.9% of the AMD Radeon 8050S (delta -0.3%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (delta 2.6%), Intel Arc Pro A60 (delta 2.6%), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (delta 2.9%). This clustering indicates the W6600M is a well-rounded performer that trades blows with a diverse set of competitors across different generations and vendors. The PRO V710, meanwhile, is bracketed by the NVIDIA P102-100 (delta 0.2%), AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (delta 0.5%), Intel Arc A570M (delta 0.7%), and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (delta 1%). These are tighter deltas, showing the PRO V710 is finely matched against its immediate rivals, though its raw OpenCL score suggests it can punch well above its average when the workload aligns.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are separated by a full architectural generation. The W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 using the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The PRO V710 advances to RDNA 3.0 with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed "Wheat Nas," produced on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. This node shrink is significant: the PRO V710 packs 28,100 million transistors into a 346 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². By contrast, the W6600M has 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, for a density of 46.7M per mm². The newer process allows the PRO V710 to fit nearly 2.5 times more transistors while using a die that is only about 46% larger.

Core counts follow the same trajectory. The W6600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The PRO V710 nearly doubles each of these: 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 ray tracing cores. This doubling of execution resources is the primary driver behind the PRO V710’s superior compute performance.

Memory configuration also diverges sharply. The W6600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The PRO V710 offers 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, pushing bandwidth to 504.0 GB/s. The PRO V710 has 3.5 times the memory capacity and more than double the bandwidth, which is critical for large datasets and high-resolution textures. Clock speeds tell a more nuanced story: the W6600M has a base clock of 1224 MHz and a boost clock of 2034 MHz, while the PRO V710 runs at 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost. The W6600M actually has a higher boost clock, but the PRO V710’s higher base clock and vastly larger core count more than compensate.

The FP32 throughput numbers crystallize the difference. The W6600M delivers 7.290 TFLOPS, while the PRO V710 achieves 27.65 TFLOPS—roughly 3.8 times higher. FP16 performance tells a similar story: the W6600M reaches 14.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the PRO V710 hits 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The PRO V710’s 1:1 FP16 ratio means it does not sacrifice half-precision performance, which is valuable for AI inference and certain scientific workloads.

Power and physical specifications differ as expected for their respective classes. The W6600M consumes 90 W and is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors, reflecting its mobile-oriented design. The PRO V710 draws 158 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and comes as a single-slot card. The PRO V710 lists a suggested PSU of 450 W, while the W6600M has no such recommendation, again underscoring its integration into portable systems.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins decisively in raw compute, memory capacity, and memory bandwidth. Its 116,460 Geekbench OpenCL score against the W6600M’s 56,140 makes it the clear choice for GPU-accelerated compute tasks such as rendering, simulation, and data processing. The 28 GB of VRAM is particularly suited for large models, big texture sets, or multi-GPU workloads where memory pooling matters. The 504.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures the PRO V710 can feed its 3,456 shading units without bottlenecking, which is essential for high-resolution rendering and complex shader workloads.

The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M wins in the portability and efficiency domain. Its 90 W TDP and IGP form factor mean it can be integrated into laptops and compact systems where the 158 W, single-slot PRO V710 would not fit. The W6600M’s higher boost clock of 2034 MHz (versus 2000 MHz on the PRO V710) suggests it can maintain competitive single-threaded or lightly-threaded performance when thermal headroom allows. Its 89th percentile ranking versus the PRO V710’s 88th also indicates that in mixed workloads, the W6600M is not far behind despite its older architecture. For mobile workstation users who need Radeon Pro features without a discrete card’s power draw, the W6600M is the practical option.

Neither card offers display outputs in the traditional sense—the W6600M’s outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," while the PRO V710 has "No outputs"—so both are intended for compute or rendering tasks where the display is handled by another GPU or an iGPU.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is far ahead, scoring 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL versus 56,140 for the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, a delta of 51.8% in favor of the PRO V710.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The PRO V710 offers 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the W6600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The PRO V710 has 3.5 times the capacity and 2.25 times the bandwidth.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The W6600M uses 90 W and requires no power connectors, while the PRO V710 consumes 158 W and needs a single 8-pin connector. The W6600M’s lower power draw is suited for mobile integration, while the PRO V710 is a higher-performance discrete card.

Q: Are these cards comparable in average benchmark scores?

A: The W6600M has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 61,896 (89th percentile) versus 58,657 (88th percentile) for the PRO V710. The PRO V710’s lower average despite a huge OpenCL win suggests its performance is more workload-dependent.

Q: What architectural differences matter most?

A: The PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm process with 3,456 shading units and 54 ray tracing cores, versus RDNA 2.0 on 7 nm with 1,792 shading units and 28 ray tracing cores for the W6600M. The PRO V710 also has nearly 2.5 times the transistor count.

Q: Do either cards have display outputs?

A: The W6600M’s display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," while the PRO V710 has "No outputs." Both are designed for compute or rendering tasks rather than direct display driving.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion: the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the superior compute card in nearly every measurable way, with more than double the OpenCL score, 3.8 times the FP32 throughput, and 3.5 times the memory capacity. It is the correct choice for server, workstation, or rendering applications where performance and memory headroom are paramount, and where the 158 W power draw and single-slot form factor are acceptable constraints.

The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is the right pick only for systems that cannot accommodate a discrete card. Its 90 W TDP and IGP design allow it to function in mobile or compact chassis, and its 89th percentile ranking shows it is no slouch in general workloads. However, its 7.290 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB memory limit its ceiling for demanding tasks. Users who need Radeon Pro features in a laptop should choose the W6600M; users who need compute power in a stationary system should choose the PRO V710. There is no middle ground in the data—the performance gap is too wide.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon PRO V710 |

|-------|----------------------|---------------------|

| Chip | Navi 23 | Navi 32 |

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Mobile (W6x00M) | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 11,060 million | 28,100 million |

| Die Size | 237 mm² | 346 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 46.7M / mm² | 81.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1224 MHz | 1900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 28 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 224 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 504.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 3456 |

| TMUs | 112 | 216 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 54 |

| Pixel Rate | 130.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 227.8 GTexel/s | 432.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.290 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 14.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 90 W | 158 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | — | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | — |

| Release Date | 2021-06-07 | 2024-10-02 |

| Predecessor | FirePro Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega |