AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA T1000 Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 580X and the NVIDIA T1000 are both end-of-life workstation graphics cards, but they target very different niches within the professional market. The Radeon Pro 580X is a high-power, Apple MPX-based part designed for Mac Pro systems, while the T1000 is a low-profile, single-slot PCIe card for standard workstations. The benchmark data shows a split decision: the T1000 wins the OpenCL test, while the Radeon Pro 580X dominates in Vulkan, with a significant overall performance gap in favor of AMD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two cards were tested in two cross-platform compute benchmarks, and the results show a clear division of strengths. In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA T1000 scores 37,704, while the AMD Radeon Pro 580X scores 36,426. This gives the T1000 a win with a deltaPct of -3.4%, meaning the AMD card trails by that margin. While the T1000 wins, the margin is modest; the Radeon Pro 580X is not far behind in this particular test.

The Geekbench Vulkan result is a much more decisive affair. Here, the AMD Radeon Pro 580X scores 40,115, compared to the T1000’s 34,874. The deltaPct is a substantial 15%, meaning the AMD card outperforms the NVIDIA card by 15% in Vulkan. This is the largest performance differential between the two cards in any test. The Radeon Pro 580X’s Vulkan score is also its highest benchmark result across all tested APIs, while the T1000’s Vulkan score is its lowest.

Looking at the average benchmark scores, the Radeon Pro 580X has a clear overall advantage. Its average score across all benchmarks is 38,706, while the T1000’s is 36,289. This places the Radeon Pro 580X in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, while the T1000 sits in the 80th percentile. The T1000’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5300M, has an average score of 36,529 with a deltaPct of -0.7%, showing the T1000 is only slightly ahead of that mobile card. The Radeon Pro 580X’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A, scores 38,691 with a deltaPct of 0%, indicating the two are statistically tied in average performance.

In terms of raw compute throughput, the differences are stark. The Radeon Pro 580X delivers 5.530 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the T1000 delivers 2.500 TFLOPS. This is more than a 2x advantage for the AMD card. However, the T1000 has a notable advantage in FP16 compute: it delivers 5.000 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the Radeon Pro 580X manages 5.530 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. This means the T1000’s FP16 performance is nearly double its FP32 rate, which could be relevant for certain AI or compute workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon Pro 580X is the clear winner for Vulkan-based workloads. Its 15% lead in the Geekbench Vulkan test demonstrates a strong advantage in this modern, cross-platform graphics API. This makes it the better choice for applications that leverage Vulkan for rendering or compute. Additionally, with its higher FP32 throughput of 5.530 TFLOPS, the Radeon Pro 580X is better suited for general-purpose single-precision compute tasks. Its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256-bit bus and 218.9 GB/s bandwidth also provides a significant memory capacity and bandwidth advantage over the T1000, which is beneficial for large datasets.

The NVIDIA T1000 wins in OpenCL, with a score of 37,704 versus the Radeon Pro 580X’s 36,426. This makes it the better choice for applications that rely heavily on OpenCL for compute acceleration. The T1000 also has a significant advantage in FP16 compute, delivering 5.000 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, which is nearly double the Radeon Pro 580X’s FP16 rate relative to its FP32. This makes the T1000 more efficient for workloads that can utilize half-precision arithmetic. Furthermore, the T1000’s much lower TDP of 50 W (versus 185 W for the Radeon Pro 580X) means it can be deployed in systems with smaller power supplies and less demanding cooling, making it a practical choice for space-constrained or lower-power workstations.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The AMD Radeon Pro 580X uses the Ellesmere chip, based on the GCN 4.0 architecture, and is fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. The die size is 232 mm², and it houses 5,700 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 24.6M / mm². In contrast, the NVIDIA T1000 uses the TU117 chip, based on the Turing architecture, and is fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 200 mm², and it contains 4,700 million transistors, with a density of 23.5M / mm².

The compute resource configuration is vastly different. The Radeon Pro 580X has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs). The T1000 has only 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. This explains the Radeon Pro 580X’s higher texture rate of 172.8 GTexel/s versus the T1000’s 78.12 GTexel/s. However, the T1000 has a higher pixel rate of 44.64 GPixel/s compared to 38.40 GPixel/s for the Radeon Pro 580X, thanks to its higher boost clock of 1395 MHz versus 1200 MHz.

Memory architecture differs as well. The Radeon Pro 580X uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1710 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), yielding 218.9 GB/s of bandwidth. The T1000 uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective), yielding 160.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 580X has double the memory capacity and significantly more bandwidth, while the T1000 uses a newer memory type and has a higher effective speed per pin. The Radeon Pro 580X’s API support includes DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, while the T1000 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The T1000 supports a higher version of DirectX and Vulkan.

The Verdict

From the data, the AMD Radeon Pro 580X is the more powerful card overall. Its average benchmark score of 38,706 is over 6% higher than the T1000’s 36,289. It wins decisively in Vulkan by 15%, and its FP32 compute is more than double that of the T1000. With 8 GB of memory and a 256-bit bus, it is better equipped for large, memory-intensive workloads. The Radeon Pro 580X is the choice for users who need maximum compute throughput and are working with Vulkan-based applications or large datasets. Its 82nd percentile ranking versus the T1000’s 80th percentile reflects its higher overall performance ceiling.

The NVIDIA T1000 is the better choice for specific scenarios. It wins in OpenCL, which is a common API for professional applications. Its FP16 performance of 5.000 TFLOPS is nearly double its FP32 rate, making it more efficient for half-precision compute tasks. Its 50 W TDP is a fraction of the Radeon Pro 580X’s 185 W, allowing for silent, low-power operation in compact workstations. The T1000 is also a single-slot card with 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the Radeon Pro 580X uses an Apple MPX bus interface with 2x HDMI 2.0b outputs. If you need a low-profile, power-efficient card for a standard PCIe slot and your software uses OpenCL, the T1000 is the logical pick. If you need raw performance and Vulkan support, and you have the power and cooling headroom, the Radeon Pro 580X is the superior option.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 580X has an average benchmark score of 38,706, while the NVIDIA T1000 has an average score of 36,289.

Q: How big is the performance difference in Vulkan?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 580X scores 40,115 in Geekbench Vulkan, which is 15% higher than the NVIDIA T1000’s score of 34,874.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory, while the NVIDIA T1000 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The NVIDIA T1000 has a TDP of 50 W, while the AMD Radeon Pro 580X has a TDP of 185 W.

Q: Which card is better for OpenCL workloads?

A: The NVIDIA T1000 wins in Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 37,704, compared to the AMD Radeon Pro 580X’s score of 36,426.

Q: Does the NVIDIA T1000 support a newer version of Vulkan?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA T1000 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the AMD Radeon Pro 580X supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA T1000 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |

| Transistors | 5,700 million | 4,700 million |

| Die Size | 232 mm² | 200 mm² |

| Base Clock | 1100 MHz | 1065 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1395 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 218.9 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2304 | 896 |

| TMUs | 144 | 56 |

| ROPs | 32 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | 44.64 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 78.12 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | 2.500 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 185 W | 50 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Bus Interface | Apple MPX | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 2x HDMI 2.0b | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.3 | 1.4 |