AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile occupy vastly different corners of the GPU landscape, separated by six years of architecture evolution and distinct design goals. The data shows a decisive performance gap, but the story is more nuanced than simple score comparison, as the Radeon Pro 580X holds a higher percentile ranking (82nd) than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (80th) despite far lower raw compute numbers, a paradox explained by their differing test suites and market positions.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are starkly one-sided. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 against the AMD Radeon Pro 580X’s 36,426, a delta of -74.7% from the AMD part’s perspective. That is not a marginal improvement; it is a 3.9x raw performance advantage for the mobile NVIDIA chip. The Vulkan results tell a similar tale, with NVIDIA scoring 139,213 versus AMD’s 40,115, a -71.2% delta. These are the only two shared benchmarks in the data, and NVIDIA wins both outright, giving it a 2-0 sweep in the wins column.

The magnitude of these victories deserves emphasis. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s OpenCL score is nearly four times that of the Radeon Pro 580X, while its Vulkan score is roughly 3.5 times higher. This is not a case of one card edging out another in a few workloads; the NVIDIA part dominates in every measured compute scenario. However, the Radeon Pro 580X’s average benchmark score across its three tests (Geekbench Metal, OpenCL, and Vulkan) is 38,706, which actually places it higher in the overall percentile ranking (82nd) than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s average of 35,435 (80th percentile). This discrepancy arises because NVIDIA’s average is pulled down by its PassMark scores, which include low DirectX 10 (151), DirectX 11 (237), and DirectX 9 (259) results that drag its mean downward despite the massive Geekbench wins.

The Verdict

From a pure performance standpoint, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear winner. Its Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 74.7% and 71.2% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 580X, respectively, leaving no ambiguity about raw compute dominance. Anyone needing maximum throughput in OpenCL or Vulkan workloads should choose the NVIDIA part without hesitation. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also brings modern API support with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, compared to the Radeon Pro 580X’s DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3.

Yet the percentile data complicates a blanket recommendation. The Radeon Pro 580X sits at the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 80th, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (deltaPct 0.9%) and the AMD Radeon Pro 575X (deltaPct -1%). This suggests that in the broader benchmark ecosystem, the older AMD card holds its own against much newer hardware, likely due to its strong Metal performance (39,577 in Geekbench Metal) which is absent from NVIDIA’s test suite. For users in macOS environments where Metal is the primary API, the Radeon Pro 580X may be the more relevant choice, despite its lower raw numbers. The verdict is not simply “NVIDIA wins” — it is “NVIDIA wins on raw compute, but the AMD card remains competitive in its specific ecosystem.”

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is immense, reflecting six years of semiconductor progress. The AMD Radeon Pro 580X uses the Ellesmere chip built on GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 5,700 million transistors into a 232 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.6 million per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, by contrast, uses the GB205 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 31,100 million transistors in a 263 mm² die, achieving a density of 118.3 million per mm² — nearly five times denser than the AMD chip.

This density difference translates into fundamentally different feature sets. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, while the Radeon Pro 580X has neither. NVIDIA’s card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders, whereas AMD’s part tops out at DirectX 12 (12_0). The shading unit counts reflect this gap: 5,888 shading units on NVIDIA versus 2,304 on AMD, with proportional increases in TMUs (184 vs 144) and ROPs (80 vs 32). The NVIDIA chip also has a higher texture rate (266.2 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (115.8 GPixel/s vs 38.40 GPixel/s), indicating a more balanced and capable compute pipeline.

Memory architecture diverges sharply as well. The Radeon Pro 580X uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 218.9 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a narrower 192-bit bus but achieves 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth — over three times the AMD card’s throughput. This bandwidth advantage is critical for modern workloads like AI inference and high-resolution textures, which the older GDDR5 memory cannot sustain.

Specification Differences

The specification table reveals several key divergences beyond the obvious compute gap. Clock speeds tell an interesting story: the AMD card has a higher base clock (1100 MHz vs 847 MHz) but a lower boost clock (1200 MHz vs 1447 MHz), meaning NVIDIA’s chip ramps higher under load. Memory clocks differ as well, with AMD at 1710 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective) versus NVIDIA’s 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) — the GDDR7 memory operates at four times the effective data rate of GDDR5.

Thermal design power is a dramatic differentiator. The Radeon Pro 580X consumes 185 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at just 60 W — less than one-third the power draw. This makes the NVIDIA part far more efficient on a per-watt basis, delivering 17.04 TFLOPS of FP32 performance at 60 W versus AMD’s 5.530 TFLOPS at 185 W. The NVIDIA card also has no power connectors required, whereas the AMD card’s power connector is unspecified, and it uses an Apple MPX bus interface compared to NVIDIA’s PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs differ too: AMD offers 2x HDMI 2.0b, while NVIDIA’s outputs are described as “Portable Device Dependent,” reflecting its mobile design intent.

Production status and release timing further separate them. The Radeon Pro 580X is end-of-life, released in March 2019, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is active, released in February 2025, and succeeds the GeForce 40 Mobile series. The AMD part has no predecessor or successor listed, while NVIDIA explicitly lists its predecessor.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance in shared benchmarks?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both shared Geekbench tests decisively: 143,870 vs 36,426 in OpenCL (-74.7% delta) and 139,213 vs 40,115 in Vulkan (-71.2% delta).

Q: Why does the AMD Radeon Pro 580X have a higher percentile rank despite losing benchmarks?

A: The Radeon Pro 580X sits at the 82nd percentile versus the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 80th, because AMD’s average benchmark score of 38,706 is boosted by its Geekbench Metal result (39,577), a test NVIDIA does not participate in, while NVIDIA’s average of 35,435 is dragged down by low PassMark DirectX scores.

Q: How do memory bandwidth and capacity compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile offers 12 GB of GDDR7 with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB of GDDR5 with 218.9 GB/s. NVIDIA’s bandwidth is more than three times higher.

Q: What are the power consumption differences?

A: The Radeon Pro 580X has a TDP of 185 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 60 W, making NVIDIA’s chip over three times more power-efficient.

Q: Which GPU supports newer APIs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Radeon Pro 580X supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Q: Are there any ray tracing or tensor core capabilities on the AMD card?

A: No. The Radeon Pro 580X has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear winner in any workload that leverages its architectural advantages. Its 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 184 tensor cores make it suited for compute-heavy tasks like AI inference, machine learning training, and real-time ray tracing. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility position it for modern gaming and professional 3D applications that use these APIs. Its low 60 W TDP and lack of power connectors also make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where thermal and power constraints are tight, and its active production status ensures ongoing driver support.

The AMD Radeon Pro 580X wins in a narrower but still relevant set of scenarios. Its Geekbench Metal score of 39,577, which is not even tested on the NVIDIA card, indicates strong performance in macOS environments where Metal is the primary graphics API. The 82nd percentile ranking and competitive proximity to the RTX 5080 Mobile (0.9% delta) suggest it remains viable in certain legacy or Apple-specific workflows. Its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory and 256-bit bus, while slower, may be sufficient for older professional applications that do not require the latest API features. The card’s end-of-life status and 185 W TDP, however, mean it is best suited for fixed installations like the Apple MPX bus systems it was designed for, rather than new portable builds. Users who prioritize Metal performance in an Apple ecosystem should consider the Radeon Pro 580X; everyone else should look to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.