AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and AMD Radeon Pro 580X sit at opposite ends of the GPU timeline, and the benchmark data reflects that chasm. The RTX 5070 wins both shared head-to-head tests by massive margins, while the Pro 580X trails in every metric where they overlap. However, the Radeon Pro 580X holds a unique position as an integrated Apple MPX solution with a 2019 release, whereas the RTX 5070 is a 2025 active product; the data shows these cards serve entirely different ecosystems and workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 dominates the two benchmarks that both cards have taken. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 172,660 against the Pro 580X’s 36,426, a 374% advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 posts 178,923 versus 40,115, a 346% lead. These are not close contests; the RTX 5070 is between 4.3x and 4.7x faster in raw compute workloads.

The AMD Radeon Pro 580X’s only win is in the Geekbench Metal benchmark, where it scores 39,577. The RTX 5070 has no Metal result in the data, so this is not a direct comparison—it simply shows the Pro 580X retains some utility in Apple’s Metal API environment. Its OpenCL and Vulkan scores (36,426 and 40,115, respectively) are within 10% of each other, indicating balanced performance across those APIs, but they are far below the RTX 5070’s figures.

Looking at the RTX 5070’s broader benchmark suite, it shows strength across different test types. Its Passmark G3D score of 29,137 is the standout among its Passmark results, while its Passmark GPU Compute score of 15,787 suggests solid compute throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 reflects modern DirectX 12 gaming capability. The Pro 580X has no Passmark or 3DMark results in the data, so its performance in those areas cannot be quantified here.

The RTX 5070 also wins on architectural features. It has ray tracing cores (48) and tensor cores (192), while the Pro 580X has neither. This means the RTX 5070 can accelerate ray-traced workloads and AI-driven features, while the Pro 580X cannot. The RTX 5070’s 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth dwarfs the Pro 580X’s 8 GB of GDDR5 at 218.9 GB/s, giving the newer card a clear advantage in memory-heavy tasks.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: pick the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 for any workload that appears in both cards’ benchmark sets. It wins Geekbench OpenCL by 374% and Geekbench Vulkan by 346%. Its average benchmark score of 40,377 slightly exceeds the Pro 580X’s 38,706, though both sit at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. The RTX 5070’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (0.1% higher average score) and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (1.2% lower), showing it is competitive within its own generation. The Pro 580X’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A (0% difference) and the AMD Radeon Pro 575X (1% lower), placing it in a much lower performance tier.

Choose the AMD Radeon Pro 580X only if you require an integrated Apple MPX form factor with dual HDMI 2.0b outputs and a 185 W TDP. The data shows it is end-of-life, with no successor, and its 14 nm process node from GlobalFoundries is two generations behind the RTX 5070’s 5 nm TSMC node. For anyone building or upgrading a system that can accept a dual-slot PCIe 5.0 x16 card, the RTX 5070 is the only rational choice based on the benchmark evidence.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two shared benchmarks tell a story of generational leap. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070’s 172,660 score is 374% higher than the Pro 580X’s 36,426. To put that in perspective, the Pro 580X would need to nearly quadruple its score to match. The RTX 5070’s FP32 compute of 30.87 TFLOPS against the Pro 580X’s 5.530 TFLOPS explains this gap—the newer card has roughly 5.6x the raw floating-point throughput.

Geekbench Vulkan shows a similar pattern: 178,923 for the RTX 5070 versus 40,115 for the Pro 580X, a 346% delta. The RTX 5070’s Vulkan score is slightly higher than its OpenCL score, while the Pro 580X’s Vulkan score is slightly higher than its OpenCL score as well. The Pro 580X’s best result is its Metal score of 39,577, which is still below the RTX 5070’s lowest shared-benchmark score (172,660) by over 4x.

The RTX 5070’s texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s are 2.8x and 5.2x the Pro 580X’s 172.8 GTexel/s and 38.40 GPixel/s, respectively. These fill-rate advantages show up in real-world rendering tasks. The RTX 5070 also has 6,144 shading units against the Pro 580X’s 2,304, a 2.7x increase, and 192 TMUs versus 144, a 1.3x increase. Its 80 ROPs more than double the Pro 580X’s 32.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40,377, while the AMD Radeon Pro 580X averages 38,706. The RTX 5070’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, scores 40,318 (0.1% higher), while the Pro 580X’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A, scores 38,691 (0% difference).

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 580X support ray tracing?

A: No. The Pro 580X has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores in its specifications. The RTX 5070 includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Pro 580X has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 218.9 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070’s memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the Pro 580X’s is 1710 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective).

Q: Which card is better for DirectX 12 gaming?

A: The RTX 5070, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 and its DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support. The Pro 580X supports DirectX 12 (12_0) but has no 3DMark results in the data to compare directly.

Q: Which card has a higher power draw?

A: The RTX 5070 has a TDP of 250 W and requires a 600 W suggested PSU with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Pro 580X has a TDP of 185 W, no power connectors listed, and no suggested PSU, reflecting its integrated IGP slot design.

Q: What are the production statuses of these cards?

A: The RTX 5070 is marked as Active with a release date of 2025-03-03. The Pro 580X is end-of-life, released 2019-03-17, with no predecessor or successor listed.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The Pro 580X uses AMD’s GCN 4.0 architecture on the Ellesmere chip, built on GlobalFoundries’ 14 nm process with 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, for a density of 24.6M per mm². The RTX 5070 packs 5.5x more transistors into a slightly larger die.

The RTX 5070 includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, features entirely absent from the Pro 580X. Its shading unit count is 6,144 versus 2,304, and it has 192 TMUs versus 144. The RTX 5070’s FP32 compute is 30.87 TFLOPS, and its FP16 is also 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The Pro 580X’s FP32 and FP16 are both 5.530 TFLOPS (1:1). The RTX 5070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6; the Pro 580X supports DirectX 12 (12_0), Vulkan 1.3, and OpenGL 4.6.

Memory technology differs fundamentally: the RTX 5070 uses GDDR7 with 12 GB capacity and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Pro 580X uses GDDR5 with 8 GB and 218.9 GB/s. The RTX 5070’s pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s versus 38.40 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s versus 172.8 GTexel/s. The RTX 5070’s boost clock is 2512 MHz, more than double the Pro 580X’s 1200 MHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | AMD Radeon Pro 580X |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 5 nm | 14 nm |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | 5,700 million |

| Die size | 263 mm² | 232 mm² |

| Base clock | 2325 MHz | 1100 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2512 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Memory size | 12 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |

| Memory bus | 192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 218.9 GB/s |

| Shading units | 6144 | 2304 |

| TMUs | 192 | 144 |

| ROPs | 80 | 32 |

| RT cores | 48 | None |

| Tensor cores | 192 | None |

| FP32 | 30.87 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.530 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 250 W | 185 W |

| Slot width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power connector | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | None |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Apple MPX |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 2x HDMI 2.0b |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Production status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release date | 2025-03-03 | 2019-03-17 |

| Launch MSRP | 549 USD | None |