AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro 580X represent two vastly different eras of GPU design, one a modern high-end consumer part and the other a legacy workstation component for Apple systems. The data shows a complete dominance by the RTX 4070 Ti across every shared benchmark metric, with performance deltas that range from 385.8% to 433%. While the Radeon Pro 580X holds a respectable 82nd percentile among all GPUs, the RTX 4070 Ti sits at the 84th percentile, a narrow gap in relative standing that belies the enormous absolute performance gulf between them. This comparison highlights how architectural generational leaps, not just incremental improvements, can fundamentally separate two products that nominally target similar graphics acceleration roles.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti than the AMD Radeon Pro 580X in OpenCL?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176,953 compared to the Radeon Pro 580X’s 36,426, resulting in a 385.8% performance advantage for the NVIDIA card.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 44,795, while the Radeon Pro 580X averages 38,706. This places the RTX 4070 Ti 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A6000 and the Radeon Pro 580X 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce MX570.

Q: Which GPU has a higher memory bandwidth and what is the difference?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti features a 504.2 GB/s bandwidth with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, whereas the Radeon Pro 580X offers 218.9 GB/s with 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus. The NVIDIA card’s bandwidth is more than double.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: No, both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X have a production status of "End-of-life." The RTX 4070 Ti was released on January 2, 2023, while the Radeon Pro 580X was released on March 17, 2019.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two architectures?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GlobalFoundries’ 14 nm process. This node difference contributes to the RTX 4070 Ti’s transistor density of 121.8M per mm² versus 24.6M per mm² for the AMD card.

Q: What is the Vulkan performance gap between the two cards?

A: In the Geekbench Vulkan benchmark, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 213,808 against the Radeon Pro 580X’s 40,115, which means the NVIDIA GPU is 433% faster in this API test.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD104 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². In contrast, the AMD Radeon Pro 580X relies on the much older GCN 4.0 architecture with the Ellesmere chip, produced on GlobalFoundries’ 14 nm node. The AMD GPU houses only 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.6M per mm². This six-year gap in manufacturing technology explains why the RTX 4070 Ti can fit over six times more transistors into a similar physical footprint.

The compute architectures diverge sharply as well. The RTX 4070 Ti provides 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, alongside 60 dedicated ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The Radeon Pro 580X, by contrast, offers 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor core hardware present. The NVIDIA card’s FP32 throughput reaches 40.09 TFLOPS, while the AMD card manages just 5.530 TFLOPS, an 8.3x difference in raw compute capability. Memory architecture also differs fundamentally: the RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the Radeon Pro 580X uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 218.9 GB/s bandwidth.

Feature support reflects the generational gap. The RTX 4070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Radeon Pro 580X is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both cards support OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card’s boost clock of 2610 MHz dramatically exceeds the AMD card’s 1200 MHz boost. Power delivery differs as well, with the RTX 4070 Ti drawing 285 W TDP via a 16-pin connector, while the Radeon Pro 580X is rated at 185 W and uses an Apple MPX bus interface with no external power connectors. The RTX 4070 Ti also offers PCIe 4.0 x16, whereas the Radeon Pro 580X uses the proprietary Apple MPX slot.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark between the two GPUs is Geekbench, where the RTX 4070 Ti wins both available tests by margins that are difficult to contextualize outside of generational leaps. In OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176,953 versus 36,426 for the Radeon Pro 580X, a 385.8% advantage. This means the NVIDIA card delivers nearly five times the compute throughput in this general-purpose GPU workload. The Vulkan test shows an even larger gap, with the RTX 4070 Ti scoring 213,808 against 40,115 for the AMD card, translating to a 433% delta. This latter result is notable because Vulkan is a lower-level API that tends to expose raw architectural efficiency, and the Ada Lovelace design wins decisively here.

The Radeon Pro 580X has no benchmark where it beats the RTX 4070 Ti, as the data records 2 wins for the NVIDIA GPU and 0 for the AMD card. The RTX 4070 Ti’s closest rival in the broader database is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, which scores 45,152 on average, placing the RTX 4070 Ti just 0.8% behind. Meanwhile, the Radeon Pro 580X’s nearest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A at 38,691 average, with a 0% delta. These proximity scores show that the RTX 4070 Ti competes in the upper mid-range of desktop GPUs, while the Radeon Pro 580X sits squarely in the entry-level mobile segment despite being a desktop part for Macs.

The average benchmark score comparison reinforces the head-to-head results. The RTX 4070 Ti’s 44,795 average is 15.7% higher than the Radeon Pro 580X’s 38,706. However, the percentile rankings are closer: 84th versus 82nd percentile among all GPUs. This suggests that while the RTX 4070 Ti is absolutely far faster, the Radeon Pro 580X’s competition pool includes fewer high-end workstation parts, so its relative standing remains respectable. The RTX 4070 Ti also shows strong results in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 5,024, and Passmark G3D at 31,624, indicating solid gaming performance, though the Radeon Pro 580X has no comparable data for these tests.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4070 Ti uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, while the Radeon Pro 580X uses 14 nm from GlobalFoundries. Transistor counts are 35,800 million versus 5,700 million, and die sizes are 294 mm² versus 232 mm². Base clocks are 2310 MHz versus 1100 MHz, with boost clocks of 2610 MHz versus 1200 MHz. Memory configurations diverge: 12 GB GDDR6X at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) versus 8 GB GDDR5 at 1710 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective). Bus widths are 192-bit versus 256-bit, with resulting bandwidths of 504.2 GB/s versus 218.9 GB/s.

Compute resources differ substantially. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 60 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 580X has 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no RT or tensor cores. Pixel rates are 208.8 GPixel/s versus 38.40 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 626.4 GTexel/s versus 172.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 40.09 TFLOPS versus 5.530 TFLOPS, with both showing 1:1 FP16 ratios. TDP ratings are 285 W versus 185 W, with the RTX 4070 Ti requiring a 16-pin connector and 600 W suggested PSU, while the Radeon Pro 580X uses an Apple MPX interface with no external power or PSU recommendation. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 1.4a versus 2x HDMI 2.0b. The RTX 4070 Ti is a dual-slot card at 285 mm length, while the Radeon Pro 580X is an IGP with no listed dimensions.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti wins in every scenario where performance matters. For compute-heavy workloads like OpenCL and Vulkan, it is 385.8% and 433% faster respectively, making it suitable for tasks like 3D rendering, GPU compute, and modern game development. Its 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features, which the Radeon Pro 580X cannot offer at all. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity and speed for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The RTX 4070 Ti’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure it handles current and near-future graphics APIs.

The AMD Radeon Pro 580X has no benchmark wins against the RTX 4070 Ti, but its design targets a different niche. As an IGP for Apple Mac systems using the MPX bus, it serves users who need a discrete GPU upgrade within a Mac Pro chassis. Its 185 W TDP and lack of external power connectors make it a low-power, drop-in solution for those systems. The 8 GB GDDR5 memory and 256-bit bus provide decent bandwidth for its era, and its 82nd percentile ranking shows it is not a weak performer in absolute terms. For users with legacy Mac software that requires the Radeon Pro series, or for those who need dual HDMI 2.0b outputs, the 580X remains functional, but the data is unambiguous: the RTX 4070 Ti is categorically superior in raw performance, and no shared benchmark demonstrates any advantage for the AMD card.