AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile represent two vastly different eras of mobile graphics, separated by nearly eight years of architectural evolution. The data shows a decisive performance gap, with the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominating in every shared benchmark, yet the Radeon Pro 575 holds its own in the context of its generation and form factor. This analysis breaks down the numbers, architectural chasms, and practical implications for each GPU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmarks between the two GPUs are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, and the results are starkly one-sided. In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon Pro 575 scores 34,596, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves 143,870. This represents a delta of -76% for the AMD part, meaning the NVIDIA GPU is roughly four times faster in this compute-oriented workload. Similarly, in Geekbench Vulkan, the Radeon Pro 575 produces 37,878 points against the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 139,213, a -72.8% delta. The NVIDIA GPU’s advantage is consistent and overwhelming in both APIs, indicating not just higher raw throughput but also superior driver optimization for modern compute tasks.

Beyond these direct comparisons, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s broader benchmark suite reveals its strength profile. Its Passmark G3D score of 24,004 and GPU Compute score of 10,101 are far beyond anything the Radeon Pro 575 could approach, given the latter’s average benchmark score of 39,555 across its three Geekbench tests. The NVIDIA GPU’s Passmark DirectX 11 score of 237 and DirectX 10 score of 151, while not directly comparable to Geekbench, indicate strong legacy API performance. The Radeon Pro 575’s best result is its Geekbench Metal score of 46,192, which is notably higher than its OpenCL and Vulkan scores, suggesting Apple-centric optimization that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile cannot leverage since it lacks a Metal entry in its benchmark set.

The average benchmark scores tell a nuanced story. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s average of 35,435 is actually lower than the Radeon Pro 575’s 39,555, but this is misleading. The NVIDIA GPU’s average is dragged down by its Passmark DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores (259, 151, 237, and 102 respectively), which are likely on a different scoring scale than Geekbench. When isolating the shared Geekbench tests, the NVIDIA GPU is unequivocally superior. The Radeon Pro 575’s nearest rivals—the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568 avg, 0% delta), AMD Radeon Pro 575X (39,116 avg, 1.1%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40,063 avg, -1.3%), and AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40,318 avg, -1.9%)—all cluster within 2% of each other, confirming the Pro 575 sits in a tightly competitive mid-range bracket of its era.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins unequivocally in compute-heavy workloads, as evidenced by its 4x advantage in Geekbench OpenCL and 3.7x advantage in Geekbench Vulkan. This makes it the clear choice for modern rendering, machine learning inference, and any task leveraging Vulkan’s low-overhead access to the GPU. Its Passmark G3D score of 24,004 also suggests strong rasterization performance for contemporary gaming and 3D applications, though direct comparison to the Pro 575 is impossible without a shared test.

The Radeon Pro 575, despite losing both head-to-head benchmarks, wins in the niche of Apple ecosystem compatibility. Its highest score is Geekbench Metal at 46,192, and it belongs to the "Radeon Pro Mac (500 Series)" generation, indicating it was designed specifically for Mac Pro systems. For users running macOS-only software that relies heavily on Metal, this GPU remains a functional option, though its 2017 release date and end-of-life production status mean it is legacy hardware. Its 82nd percentile vs all GPUs is slightly higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 80th percentile, but this likely reflects the fact that the Pro 575’s benchmark set is exclusively Geekbench compute tests, while the NVIDIA GPU’s includes legacy Passmark DX9/DX10 scores that penalize its average.

In pure power efficiency, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile claims a massive advantage. It delivers 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance while consuming only 60W TDP, whereas the Radeon Pro 575 offers 4.489 TFLOPS at 150W TDP. This means the NVIDIA GPU provides 3.8x the compute throughput at 40% of the power draw, a generational leap in efficiency that makes the older AMD part obsolete for battery-constrained laptops. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s IGP form factor versus the Pro 575’s MXM module also reflects its modern integration into thin-and-light designs.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is cavernous. The Radeon Pro 575 uses AMD’s GCN 4.0 architecture on a 14nm GlobalFoundries process, featuring 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die with a transistor density of 24.6M/mm². Its chip, Ellesmere, is a mature design from 2017. In contrast, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile employs NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5nm TSMC process, packing 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die—a transistor density of 118.3M/mm², nearly five times higher than the AMD part.

The compute resources differ correspondingly. The Radeon Pro 575 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile boasts 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. This translates to a pixel rate of 35.07 GPixel/s and texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s for the AMD GPU, versus 115.8 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA GPU—the latter being 3.3x faster at pixel fill and 1.9x faster at texture fill. The FP32 throughput gap is similarly wide: 4.489 TFLOPS for the Pro 575 versus 17.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

Memory configuration further widens the gap. The Radeon Pro 575 is limited to 4GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 217.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 672.0 GB/s—over three times the bandwidth despite a narrower interface. The NVIDIA GPU also introduces dedicated hardware absent from the AMD part: 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads that the GCN 4.0 architecture cannot perform. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Pro 575 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3, meaning it lacks features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading.

Clock behavior also differs. The Radeon Pro 575 has no listed base or boost clock, only a memory clock of 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and boost clock of 1447 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA GPU’s lower core clocks but vastly higher shader count and memory speed illustrate the architectural efficiency of Blackwell 2.0 over GCN 4.0.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile for any user requiring modern compute performance, ray tracing, or high-bandwidth memory. Its 4x lead in Geekbench OpenCL, 3.7x lead in Vulkan, and 3x memory bandwidth advantage make it the only viable choice for current gaming, professional 3D rendering, or machine learning tasks. The 60W TDP versus 150W TDP also makes it dramatically more suitable for laptop integration, offering superior performance with lower power consumption.

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is only defensible in a narrow scenario: legacy macOS systems where its Metal score of 46,192 and 82nd percentile ranking provide adequate performance for older Apple-specific workflows. It shares its performance bracket with the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 575X, all within 2% of each other, confirming it was a competent mid-range GPU in 2017. However, its end-of-life status, 4GB VRAM ceiling, and lack of RT/tensor cores make it a poor choice for any new purchase. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s active production status, 12GB VRAM, and 80th percentile ranking against all GPUs—despite being weighed down by legacy Passmark tests—cement it as the superior hardware for virtually all workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has better compute performance in OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 76% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 575’s 34,596, making it roughly four times faster in this workload.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 575 support ray tracing?

A: No. The Radeon Pro 575’s GCN 4.0 architecture has no ray tracing cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 dedicated ray tracing cores in its Blackwell 2.0 architecture.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each GPU provide?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 offers 217.0 GB/s via 4GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, while the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile provides 672.0 GB/s via 12GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, a 3.1x advantage.

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 has a higher average benchmark score of 39,555 compared to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 35,435. However, the NVIDIA GPU’s average is depressed by legacy Passmark DirectX 9/10/11/12 scores, while the AMD GPU only has Geekbench compute tests.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 has a TDP of 150W, while the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60W, meaning the NVIDIA GPU consumes 60% less power while delivering 3.8x the FP32 throughput.

Q: Are these GPUs from the same generation?

A: No. The AMD Radeon Pro 575 was released in 2017 using GCN 4.0 on 14nm, while the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Mobile was released in 2025 using Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm. The NVIDIA GPU is active production, while the AMD GPU is end-of-life.