AMD Radeon Pro 575
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon Pro 575 Specifications
GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon Pro 575 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Pro 575 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon Pro 575's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon Pro 575 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon Pro 575 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon Pro 575's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon Pro 575 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the Pro 575, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
Pro 575 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon Pro 575 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 4.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is built on AMD's GCN 4.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Pro 575 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon Pro 575 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon Pro 575 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon Pro 575 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon Pro 575 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon Pro 575. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon Pro 575 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon Pro 575 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
About AMD Radeon Pro 575
The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation GPU built on the Ellesmere chip with a GCN 4.0 architecture, manufactured by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process. The die measures 232 mm² and contains 5,700 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 24.6 million per mm². Benchmark data places this card at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average Geekbench score of 39703. Its four nearest rivals all sit within a 0.4% delta of that average, placing the Pro 575 in a tightly clustered performance group. The card is part of the Radeon Pro Mac (500 Series) generation and uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface.
How It Compares
Against the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, the Pro 575's average score of 39703 is 0.1% higher than the RX 9070 XT's 39647. A 0.1% delta is a very small difference, so the benchmark data treats the two as equivalent in average workload performance.
Relative to the AMD Radeon Pro 575X, the Pro 575 is 0.3% slower: the 575X averages 39836. This is the closest competitor in the set, and the data shows the non-X variant trailing by a margin too small to create a meaningful performance hierarchy.
Against the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile, the Pro 575 is 0.3% faster. The RTX A500 Mobile's average score is 39568, and the Pro 575's higher score places it ahead of that rival in the database ranking.
Finally, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 has the highest average score among the nearest rivals at 39879. The Pro 575 trails by 0.4%, which is the largest delta in this group. Despite being the biggest gap, it remains a fraction of a percentage point, reinforcing that the Pro 575 sits in a parity zone rather than a clear win or loss position.
Who Should Consider It
The Pro 575 is an MXM Module with no power connectors, so it is intended for portable devices that accept MXM cards and provide their own display routing; the display outputs are listed as portable-device-dependent. Its compute profile is defined by 2048 shading units, 128 texture units, 32 ROPs, 4.489 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, and 4.489 TFLOPS of FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio. For workloads that fit within the 4 GB GDDR5 frame buffer, the card can deliver its full 140.3 GTexel/s texture rate and 35.07 GPixel/s pixel rate. Users running high-resolution rendering or large-texture datasets should treat the 4 GB capacity as the binding constraint, since the 217.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 256-bit bus are sufficient only when the working set stays within that capacity. Because the production status is end-of-life, the card is most relevant as a replacement part for existing MXM-based systems, not as a candidate for a new build. The listed PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is appropriate for the host systems that support this form factor and its portable-device-dependent outputs.
Benchmark Performance
Three Geekbench scores are reported: Metal returns 46172, OpenCL returns 34732, and Vulkan returns 38204. Their average is 39703, which exactly matches the card's listed average benchmark score. The Metal result is the highest of the three, while OpenCL is the lowest. The card's percentile versus all GPUs is 83, meaning it sits above 83% of the tested graphics hardware in the database. Against its nearest rivals, the Pro 575 is 0.1% ahead of the RX 9070 XT, 0.3% ahead of the RTX A500 Mobile, 0.3% behind the Pro 575X, and 0.4% behind the RX Vega 64. None of these deltas is larger than 0.4%, and in aggregate the data indicates the Pro 575 performs on par with its nearest listed competition. The spread between API scores also shows that Metal is the strongest path for this GPU, followed by Vulkan, with OpenCL bringing up the rear.
Power and Cooling
The card's TDP is listed at 150 W. Its power connector field is None, meaning no power connectors are present on the card. No suggested PSU value is included in the fact pack, so there is no specific power supply recommendation available. The MXM Module form factor and portable-device-dependent display outputs indicate that the host device manages both power distribution and output connectivity. With a 150 W thermal design point, the host system's cooling solution must be capable of handling that heat output, though the exact cooler or chassis thermal design is not specified in the data. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, and the slot width is MXM Module, which together define the physical and electrical integration requirements for a compatible host.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Radeon Pro 575?
A: The average score is 39703, based on Geekbench Metal 46172, OpenCL 34732, and Vulkan 38204.
Q: How does it compare to the Radeon RX 9070 XT?
A: The Pro 575 is 0.1% ahead, with the RX 9070 XT averaging 39647 versus the Pro 575's 39703.
Q: How much memory bandwidth does the card have?
A: It has 217.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, with memory at 1695 MHz and an effective data rate of 6.8 Gbps.
Q: What APIs are supported?
A: DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 are all present in the API list.
Q: Is the card still in production?
A: No, its production status is end-of-life, and its release date is June 4, 2017.
Q: What is the FP16 performance?
A: FP16 throughput is 4.489 TFLOPS, equal to FP32 at a 1:1 ratio.
Memory Subsystem
The Pro 575's memory subsystem combines 4 GB of GDDR5, a 256-bit bus, and a bandwidth of 217.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1695 MHz, with an effective data rate of 6.8 Gbps. For high-resolution workloads, capacity is the more restrictive parameter: 4 GB can hold a standard professional framebuffer, but heavy texture loads or high-resolution buffers will quickly consume it. The 256-bit bus provides enough raw bandwidth to match the card's 35.07 GPixel/s pixel rate and 140.3 GTexel/s texture rate. If a workload fits within 4 GB, the memory subsystem is balanced; if it exceeds 4 GB, performance will be constrained by capacity rather than raw bandwidth. The effective 6.8 Gbps memory rate and 1695 MHz clock are the only memory speed figures in the data, and together with the 256-bit bus they produce the stated 217.0 GB/s throughput.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The fact pack lists no RT core count and no tensor core count, so ray tracing acceleration and tensor-core-based features are not quantified for this card. The GPU is based on the GCN 4.0 architecture with the Ellesmere chip, and it exposes DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Its fixed-function and compute resources are explicit: 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 32 ROPs, a texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s, and a pixel rate of 35.07 GPixel/s. FP32 and FP16 each operate at 4.489 TFLOPS, with the fact pack noting a 1:1 ratio. The absence of RT and tensor core data means those features are not part of the available specification; instead, the active API list and GCN 4.0 architecture define the supported feature set. The 5,700 million transistor count and 232 mm² die size provide the hardware foundation for these capabilities, but the card's end-of-life status means it is no longer a production target for new software optimizations.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD Radeon Pro 575 are below.
Benchmark Scores
geekbench_metalSource
Geekbench Metal tests GPU compute using Apple's Metal API. This shows how AMD Radeon Pro 575 performs in macOS and iOS applications that leverage GPU acceleration. Metal provides low-overhead access to Apple silicon GPUs.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performersgeekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon Pro 575 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
geekbench_vulkanSource
Geekbench Vulkan tests GPU compute using the modern low-overhead Vulkan API. This shows how AMD Radeon Pro 575 performs with next-generation graphics and compute workloads. Vulkan offers better CPU efficiency than older APIs like OpenGL.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
Compare with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs